Advertisement

ANN embedded data envelopment analysis approach for measuring the efficiency of state boards in India

  • Natthan Singh
  • Millie Pant
  • Amit Goel
Original Article

Abstract

In the present study, the authors propose DE(A)NN, an integration of data envelopment analysis (DEA) and artificial neural networks (ANN) as a decision making tool. The performance of proposed DE(A)NN is validated on a case study for measuring the relative efficiency of 21 Indian state education boards. As expected, it is observed that DE(A)NN increases the discriminatory power of DEA for ranking of the decision making units.

Keywords

Data envelopment analysis Relative efficiency Artificial neural network (ANN) DE(A)NN approach State boards Higher secondary education 

References

  1. Agasisti T (2013) The efficiency of Italian secondary schools and the potential role of competition: a data envelopment analysis using OECD-PISA2006 data. Educ Econ 21(5):520–544.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2010.511840 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Athanassopoulos AD, Curram SP (1996) A comparison of data envelopment analysis and artificial neural networks as tools for assessing the efficiency of decision making units. J Oper Res Soc 47(8):1000–1016.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3010408 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Atici KB, Podinovski VV (2015) Using data envelopment analysis for the assessment of technical ef fi ciency of units with different specialisations: an application. Omega 54:72–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azadeh A, Jebreili S, Chang E, Saberi M, Hussain OK (2017) An integrated fuzzy algorithm approach to factory floor design incorporating environmental quality and health impact. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manage 8(December):2071–2082.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-014-0314-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 30(9):1078–1092CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley S, Johnes G, Millington J (2001) The effect of competition on the efficiency of secondary schools in England. Eur J Oper Res 135(3):545–568.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00328-3 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Çelebi D, Bayraktar D (2008) An integrated neural network and data envelopment analysis for supplier evaluation under incomplete information. Expert Syst Appl 35(4):1698–1710.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Chhachhiya D, Sharma A, Guptha M (2017) Designing optimal architecture of neural network with particle swarm optimization techniques specifically for education dataset. IEEE 52–57Google Scholar
  10. Emrouznejad A, Shale E (2009) A combined neural network and DEA for measuring efficiency of large scale datasets. Comput Ind Eng 56(1):249–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2008.05.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garg KC, Gupta BM, Jamal T, Roy S, Kumar S (2005) Assessment of impact of AICTE funding on R&D and educational development. Scientometrics 65(2):151–160.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0264-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jauhar SK, Pant M, Dutt R (2018) Performance measurement of an Indian higher education institute: a sustainable educational supply chain management perspective. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manage 9(1):180–193.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0505-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnes J, Yu L (2008) Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions using data envelopment analysis. China Econ Rev 19(4):679–696.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2008.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Karamouzis ST, Vrettos A (2008) An artificial neural network for predicting student graduation outcomes. In: Proceedings of the world congress on engineering and computer science, pp 22–25Google Scholar
  15. Kardan AA, Sadeghi H, Ghidary SS, Sani MRF (2013) Prediction of student course selection in online higher education institutes using neural network. Comput Educ 65:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kotsiantis SB (2012) Use of machine learning techniques for educational proposes: a decision support system for forecasting students’ grades. Artif Intell Rev 37(4):331–344.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-011-9234-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuah CT, Wong KY (2011) Efficiency assessment of universities through data envelopment analysis. In Procedia computer science (vol 3, pp 499–506). Elsevier.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.084
  18. Kumar R, Natarajan R (2015) Asia Pacific management review a DEA study of airlines in India. Asia Pac Manage Rev 20(4):285–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2015.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuo RJ, Wang YC, Tien FC (2010) Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection. J Clean Prod 18(12):1161–1170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.03.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kwon H-B (2014) Performance modeling of mobile phone providers: a DEA-ANN combined approach. Benchmark Int J 21(6):1120–1144.  https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2013-0016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu H, Chen T, Chiu Y, Kuo F (2013) A comparison of three-stage DEA and artificial neural network on the operational efficiency of semi-conductor firms in Taiwan. Mod Econ 04(01):20–31.  https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2013.41003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mahapatra SS, Khan MS (2007) A neural network approach for assessing quality in technical education: an empirical study. Int J Product Qual Manage 2(3):287–306.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPQM.2007.012451 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mary Martini E, Garrett N, Lindquist T, Isham GJ (2007) The boomers are coming: a total cost of care model of the impact of population aging on health care costs in the United States by major practice category. Health Serv Res 42(1 I):201–218.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00607.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miningou ÉW, Vierstraete V (2013) Households’ living situation and the efficient provision of primary education in Burkina Faso. Econ Model 35:910–917.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mitra Debnath R, Shankar R (2009) Assessing performance of management institutions. TQM J 21(1):20–33.  https://doi.org/10.1108/17542730910924727 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mogha SK, Yadav SP, Singh SP (2014) New slack model based efficiency assessment of public sector hospitals of Uttarakhand: state of India. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manage 5(1):32–42.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-013-0207-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Munoz DA (2016) Assessing the research efficiency of higher education institutions in Chile. Int J Educ Manag 30(6):809–825.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2015-0022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ogor E (2007) Student academic performance monitoring and evaluation using data mining techniques. Electron Robot Automot Mech.  https://doi.org/10.1109/CERMA.2007.78 Google Scholar
  29. Oladokun VO, Adebanjo AT, Charles-Owaba OE (2008) Predicting students’ academic performance using artificial neural network: a case study of an engineering course. Pac J Sci Technol 9(1):72–79Google Scholar
  30. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323(6088):533–536.  https://doi.org/10.1038/323533a0 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Sagarra M, Mar-Molinero C, Agasisti T (2017) Exploring the efficiency of Mexican universities: integrating data envelopment analysis and multidimensional scaling. Omega (United Kingdom) 67:123–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.04.006 Google Scholar
  32. Santín D, Delgado FJ, Valiño A (2004) The measurement of technical efficiency: a neural network approach. Appl Econ 36(6):627–635.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0003684042000217661 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Selim S, Bursalıoğlu SA (2015) Efficiency of higher education in Turkey: a bootstrapped two-stage DEA approach. Int J Stat Appl 5(2):56–67.  https://doi.org/10.5923/j.statistics.20150502.02 Google Scholar
  34. Singh N, Pant M (2018) Evaluating the efficiency of higher secondary education state boards in India: a DEA-ANN approach. In: Abraham A, Muhuri P, Muda A, Gandhi N (eds) Intelligent systems design and applications. ISDA 2017. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 736. Springer, Cham, pp 942–951.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76348-4_90 Google Scholar
  35. Sreekumar S, Mahapatra SS (2011) Performance modeling of Indian business schools: a DEA-neural network approach. Benchmark Int J 18(2):221–239.  https://doi.org/10.1108/14635771111121685 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stevens R, Ikeda J, Casillas A, Palacio-cayetano J (1999) Artificial neural network-based performance assessments. Comput Hum Behav 15:295–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang Z (1992) An artificial neural network model for comparative study of education system of China. IFAC Proc Vol 25(18):135–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)49958-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wu D, Yang Z, Liang L (2006) Using DEA-neural network approach to evaluate branch efficiency of a large Canadian bank. Expert Syst Appl 31(1):108–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang W, Li L (2017) Efficiency evaluation of industrial waste gas control in China: a study based on data envelopment analysis (DEA) model. J Clean Prod 179:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Reliability Engineering, Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM), India and The Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology RoorkeeRoorkeeIndia
  2. 2.Institute of Engineering and TechnologyLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations