Advertisement

Rice in vitro digestion: application of INFOGEST harmonized protocol for glycemic index determination and starch morphological study

  • Jean-M. Fernandes
  • Daniel A. Madalena
  • Ana C. PinheiroEmail author
  • António A. Vicente
Original Article
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

Starch is the main sugar source present in staple foods. Understanding starch hydrolysis during digestion and the resulting glucose release can be important to strategically modulate starch digestion and glucose absorption. In vitro digestion methodologies are fundamental to evaluate starch hydrolysis length and rate, but the lack of uniformity between protocols prevent the comparison of results. In this context, three different Carolino rice varieties (i.e., Carolino white—Cw, Carolino brown—Cb and Carolino Ariete brown—CAb) were submitted to the INFOGEST harmonized in vitro digestion protocol for the evaluation of starch hydrolysis and subsequent glycemic index (GI) determination, and starch granules morphological study. Samples of Carolino rice presented total starch percentages between 64.52 (for Cb) to 71.52% (for Cw) with low amylose content (16.19–19.95%, varying in the following order Cb < Cab ≈ Cw). During digestion, between 39.43 (for CAb) to 44.48% (for Cb) of starch was hydrolyzed, classifying samples as medium GI foods (61.73–69.17). Starch hydrolysis was accompanied by a decrease of starch granules dimensions. For all samples, area decrease was higher than 59%, perimeter decrease was higher than 37%, feret diameter decrease was higher than 39% and minimum feret diameter decrease was higher than 32%. This work provides new insights to describe, both qualitatively and quantitatively, the fate of rice during digestion, and allowed establishing a comparative basis for the development of rice-based recipes with a lower GI.

Keywords

Rice starch hydrolysis Rice starch morphology Glycemic index In vitro digestion Digestion protocols 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Daniel A. Madalena acknowledge the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) for his fellowship (SFRH/BD/129127/2017). This work was supported by Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under the scope of the strategic funding of UID/BIO/04469/2019 unit and BioTecNorte operation (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004) funded by the European Regional Development Fund under the scope of Norte2020 - Programa Operacional Regional do Norte. The authors would also like to thank the investment project nº 017931 – Development of rice products with low glycemic index- co-funded by Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional (FEDER) through Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (COMPETE 2020) (POCI-01-0247-FEDER-017931).

References

  1. Atkinson FS, Foster-Powell K, Brand-Miller JC (2008) International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2008. Diabetes Care 31(12):2281–2283.  https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-1239 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Azizi R, Capuano E, Nasirpour A, Pellegrini N, Golmakani MT, Hosseini SMH, Farahnaky A (2019) Varietal differences in the effect of rice ageing on starch digestion. Food Hydrocoll 95(March):358–366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.04.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Björck I, Granfeldt Y, Liljeberg H, Tovar J, Georg Asp N (1994) Food properties affecting the digestion and absorption of carbohydrates. Am J Clin Nutr 59:699S–705S.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/59.3.699S CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boers HM, Hoorn JST, Mela DJ (2015) A systematic review of the influence of rice characteristics and processing methods on postprandial glycaemic and insulinaemic responses. Br J Nutr.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114515001841 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Brand-Miller JC, Holt SH, Pawlak DB, McMillan J (2002) Glycemic index and obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 76(1):281S–285S.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/76/1.281s CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bustos MC, Vignola MB, Pérez GT, León AE (2017) In Vitro digestion kinetics and bioaccessibility of starch in cereal food products. J Cereal Sci 77:243–250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2017.08.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang UJ, Hong YH, Jung EY, Suh HJ (2014) Rice and the glycemic index. Wheat Rice Dis Prev Health.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-401716-0.00027-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen L, Tian Y, Zhang Z, Tong Q, Sun B, Rashed Marwan MA, Jin Z (2017) Effect of pullulan on the digestible, crystalline and morphological characteristics of rice starch. Food Hydrocoll 63:383–390.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.09.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deepa G, Singh V, Akhilender Naidu K (2010) A comparative study on starch digestibility, glycemic index and resistant starch of pigmented (‘Njavara’ and’Jyothi’) and a non-pigmented (‘IR 64’) rice varieties. J Food Sci Technol 47(6):644–649.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-010-0106-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Egger L, Ménard O, Delgado-Andrade C, Alvito P, Assunção R, Balance S, Barberá R et al (2016) The harmonized INFOGEST in Vitro digestion method: from knowledge to action. Food Res Int 88(October):217–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Englyst KN, Englyst HN, Hudson GJ, Cole TJ, Cummings JH (1999) Rapidly available glucose in foods: an in vitro measurement that reflects the glycemic response. Am J Clin Nutr 69(3):448–454.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/69.3.448 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Goñi I, Garcia-Alonso A, Saura-Calixto F (1997) A starch hydrolysis procedure to estimate glycemic index. Nutr Res 17(3):427–437.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5317(97)00010-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jenkins DJA, Kendall CWC, Augustin LSA, Franceschi S, Hamidi M, Marchie A, Jenkins AL, Axelsen M (2002) Glycemic index: overview of implications in health and disease. Am J Clin Nutr 76(1):266S–273S.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/76/1.266S CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Joint FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius International Food Standards (2019) Codex alimentarius: Standard for rice CXS 198-1995. http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/codex-texts/list-standards/. Accessed 25 Nov 2018
  15. Juliano BO (1993) FAO Food and Nutrition Series No. 26 RICE in human nutrition prepared in collaboration with FAO By. http://books.irri.org/9251031495_content.pdf. Accessed 13 Oct 2018
  16. Kuang Q, Jinchuan X, Wang K, Zhou S, Liu X (2016) Structure and digestion of hybrid indica rice starch and its biosynthesis. Int J Biol Macromol 93:402–407.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.08.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ludwig DS (2002) The glycemic index. JAMA 287(18):2414.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.18.2414 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Miao M, Zhang T, Wanmeng M, Jiang B (2011) Structural characterizations of waxy maize starch residue following in vitro pancreatin and amyloglucosidase synergistic hydrolysis. Food Hydrocoll 25(2):214–220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2009.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Minekus M, Alminger M, Alvito P, Ballance S, Bohn T, Bourlieu C, Carrière F et al (2014) A standardised static in vitro digestion method suitable for food—an international consensus. Food Funct 5(6):1113–1124.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3FO60702J CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Muthayya S, Sugimoto JD, Montgomery S, Maberly GF (2014) An overview of global rice production, supply, trade, and consumption. Ann NY Acad Sci 1324(1):7–14.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12540 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nobre C, Sousa SC, Silva SP, Pinheiro AC, Coelho E, Vicente AA, Gomes AMP, Coimbra MA, Teixeira JA, Rodrigues LR (2018) In Vitro digestibility and fermentability of fructo-oligosaccharides produced by Aspergillus ibericus. J Funct Foods 46(July):278–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JFF.2018.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Patindol JA, Siebenmorgen TJ, Wang Y-J (2015) Impact of environmental factors on rice starch structure: a review. Starch Stärke 67(1–2):42–54.  https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201400174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pérez S, Bertoft E (2010) The molecular structures of starch components and their contribution to the architecture of starch granules: a comprehensive review. Starch Stärke 62(8):389–420.  https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201000013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ramos PE, Abrunhosa L, Pinheiro A, Cerqueira MA, Motta C, Castanheira I, Chandra-Hioe MV, Arcot J, Teixeira JA, Vicente AA (2016) Probiotic-loaded microcapsule system for human in situ folate production: encapsulation and system validation. Food Res Int 90(December):25–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODRES.2016.10.036 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ren X, Chen J, Molla MM, Wang C, Diao X, Shen Q (2016) In Vitro starch digestibility and in vivo glycemic response of foxtail millet and its products. Food Function 7(1):372–379.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5fo01074h CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Rodrigues DB, Chitchumroonchokchai C, Mariutti Lilian R B, Mercadante AZ, Failla ML (2017) Comparison of two static in vitro digestion methods for screening the bioaccessibility of carotenoids in fruits, vegetables, and animal products. J Agric Food Chem 65(51):11220–11228.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04854 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Roy P, Ijiri T, Okadome H, Nei D, Orikasa T, Nakamura N, Shiina T (2008) Effect of processing conditions on overall energy consumption and quality of rice (Oryza Sativa L.). J Food Eng 89(3):343–348.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.05.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Santos T, Lemos D, Guiné RPF, Correia PR (2014) Biometric characteristics of rice cultivars. In VII Congreso Ibérico de Agroingenieria y Ciencias Hortícolas: Innovar y Producir para el Futuro. Madrid. F. G. UPM, ed.:174-179. ISBN:84-695-9055-3Google Scholar
  29. Srikaeo K, Sangkhiaw J (2014) Effects of amylose and resistant starch on glycaemic index of rice noodles. LWT Food Sci Technol 59(2):1129–1135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.06.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tamura M, Singh J, Kaur L, Ogawa Y (2016) Impact of structural characteristics on starch digestibility of cooked rice. Food Chem 191:91–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.04.019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Tamura M, Okazaki Y, Kumagai C, Ogawa Y (2017) The importance of an oral digestion step in evaluating simulated in vitro digestibility of starch from cooked rice grain. Food Res Int 94(April):6–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.01.019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tester RF, Qi X, Karkalas J (2006) Hydrolysis of native starches with amylases. Anim Feed Sci Technol 130(1–2):39–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANIFEEDSCI.2006.01.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Topping DL, Fukushima M, Bird AR (2003) Resistant starch as a prebiotic and synbiotic: state of the art. Proc Nutr Soc 62(01):171–176.  https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS2002224 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. van de Velde F, van Riel J, Tromp RH (2002) Visualisation of starch granule morphologies using confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM). J Sci Food Agric 82(13):1528–1536.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Whitcomb DC, Lowe ME (2007) Human pancreatic digestive enzymes. Dig Dis Sci 52(1):1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-9589-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Woolnough JW, Bird AR, Monro JA, Brennan CS (2010) The effect of a brief salivary α-amylase exposure during chewing on subsequent in vitro starch digestion curve profiles. Int J Mol Sci 11(8):2780–2790.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms11082780 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CEB - Centre of Biological EngineeringUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations