Advertisement

Production and characterization of synbiotic Doogh, a yogurt-based Iranian drink by gum arabic, ginger extract and B. bifidum

  • Maryam Haji Ghafarloo
  • Mohammad JoukiEmail author
  • Mahsa Tabari
Original Article
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of using ginger extract and gum arabic as a prebiotic on the viability of Bifidobacterium bifidum and physico chemical properties of Doogh (yogurt drink) during storage at 4 °C for 30 days. The results showed that by increasing the amounts of gum arabic to 0.5%, B. bifidum count increased significantly (P < 0.05), but further increasing of the gum arabic, had no significant effect on B. bifidum count (P > 0.05). By increasing the amounts of gum arabic, the viscosity of the Doogh samples was increased and phase separation was reduced significantly (P < 0.05). The Doogh sample containing 0.25% gum arabic and 0.25% ginger extract had the highest number of probiotic population. Results showed that addition of B. bifidum increased acid development (°D) in Doogh samples during storage. In addition, phase separation in Doogh enriched by gum arabic was slower compared to control sample and the samples containing ginger extract. Doogh samples containing 0.25–1% gum arabic alone showed acceptable stability during storage time at 4 °C. In general, Doogh sample containing 0.25% ginger extract and 0.5% gum arabic gained the highest overall acceptability score in comparison with the other samples.

Keywords

Gum arabic Ginger extract Prebiotic Probiotic viability Phase separation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to extend their appreciation for the financial support provided by the Islamic Azad University (Iran, Tehran).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

We declare no potential conflict of interest related to this manuscript.

Ethics statement

We declare no ethical issue related with this article.

References

  1. Ahmadi E, Mortazavian AM, Fazeli MR, Ezzatpanah H, Mohammadi R (2012) The effects of inoculant variables on the physicochemical and organoleptic properties of Doogh. Int J Dairy Technol 65:274–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anema SG, Lowe EK, Li Y (2004) Effect of pH on the viscosity of heated reconstituted skim milk. Int Dairy J 14:541–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azarikia F, Abbasi S (2010) On the stabilization mechanism of Doogh (Iranian yoghurt drink) by gum tragacanth. Food Hydrocolloids 24:358–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakirci I, Kavaz A (2008) An investigation of some properties of banana yogurts made with commercial ABT-2 starter culture during storage. Int J Dairy Technol 61:270–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buffo RA, Reineccius GA, Oehlert GW (2001) Factors affecting the emulsifying and rheological properties of gum acacia in beverage emulsions. Food Hydrocolloids 15:53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins MD, Gibson GR (1999) Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics: approaches for modulating the microbial ecology of the gut. Am J Clin Nutr 69:1052S–1057SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dave RZ, Shah NP (1997) Viability of yogurt and probiotic bacteria in yogurts made from commercial starter cultures. Int Dairy J 7:31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeMan JM (1999) Principles of food chemistry. Springer, SwitzerlandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. El-Abd MM, Abdel-Hamid M, El- Sayed HS, El- Metwaly HA, El-Demerdash ME, Mohamed ZFA (2018) Viability of microencapsulated probiotics combined with plant extracts in fermented camel milk under simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Middle East J Appl Sci 8:837–850Google Scholar
  10. FAO/WHO (2001) Health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Evaluation of Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food Including Powder Milk with Live Lactic Acid Bacteria. WHO, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  11. Foroughinaia S, Abbasi S, Hamidi Esfahani Z (2007) Effects of individual and combined addition of salep, tragacantin and guar gums on the stabilization of Iranian Doogh. Iran J Nutr Sci Food Technol 2:15–27Google Scholar
  12. Ghasempour Z, Alizadeh M, Rezazad Bari MR (2012) Optimization of probiotic yogurt production containing Zedo gum. Int J Dairy Technol 65:118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gonzalez NJ, Adhikari K, Sancho-Madriz MF (2011) Sensory characteristics of peach-flavored yogurt drinks containing prebiotics and synbiotics. LWT Food Sci Technol 44:158–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hashemi SMB, Shahidi F, Mortazavi SA, Milani E, Eshaghi Z (2015) Synbiotic potential of Doogh supplemented with free and encapsulated Lactobacillus plantarum LS5 and Helianthus tuberosus inulin. J Food Sci Technol 52:45794585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hasheminya SM, Ebrahimzadeh-Mousavi SMA, Ehsani MR, Dehghannya J (2013) Production of a fiber-enriched pasteurized and non-pasteurized fermented acidified drink using gellan. Food Biosci 3:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hekmat S, Cimo A, Soltani M, Lui E, Reid G (2013) Microbial properties of probiotic fermented milk supplemented with ginseng extracts. J Food Nutr Sci 4:392–397Google Scholar
  17. Joudaki H, Mousavi M, Safari M, Emam-Djomeh Z, Gharibzahedi SMT (2013) Scrutinizing the different pectin types on stability of an Iranian traditional drink “Doogh”. Int J Biol Macromol 60:375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Joung JY, Lee JY, Ha YS, Shin YK, Kim SH, Oh NS (2016) Enhanced microbial, functional and sensory properties of herbal yogurt fermented with Korean traditional plant extracts. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour 36(1):90–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kailasapathy K (2006) Survival of free and encapsulated probiotic bacteria and their effect on the sensory properties of yoghurt. LWT Food Sci Technol 39:1221–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Karlton-Senay BD, Ibrahim SA (2013) Impact of gums on the growth of probiotics. Agro Food Ind Hi-Tech 24:10–14Google Scholar
  21. Koksoy A, Kilic M (2003) Effect of water and salt level on rheological properties of Ayran, a Turkish yoghurt drink. Int Dairy J 13:835–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koksoy A, Kilic M (2004) Use of hydrocolloids in textural stabilization of a yoghurt drink, ayran. Food Hydrocolloids 18:593–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kosikowski FV (1982) Cheese and fermented milk foods, 2nd edn. Edwards Brothers, Inc., LincolnGoogle Scholar
  24. Lucey JA (2002) Formation and physical properties of milk protein gels. J Dairy Sci 85:281–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Makras L, Van Acker G, De Vuyst L (2005) Lactobacillus casei subsp. casei 8700:2 degrades inulin-type fructans exhibiting different degrees of polymerisation. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:6531–6537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maragkoudakisa PA, Miarisa C, Rowena P, Manalisb N, Magkanari F, Kalantzopoulosa G, Tsakalidou E (2006) Production of traditional Greek yoghurt using Lactobacillus strains with probiotic potential as starter adjuncts. Int Dairy J 16:52–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nikoofar E, Hojjatoleslami M, Shariaty MA (2013) Surveying the effect of quince seed mucilage as a fat replacer on texture and physicochemical properties of semi fat set yoghurt. Int J Farm Allied Sci 2:861–865Google Scholar
  28. Ok S, Jeong WS (2012) Optimization of extraction conditions for the 6-shogaol-rich extract from ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). Prev Nutr Food Sci 17:166–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sabooni P, Pourahmad R, Mahdavi Adeli HR (2018) Improvement of viability of probiotic bacteria, organoleptic qualities and physical characteristics in kefir using transglutaminase and xanthan. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment 17:141–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sadek Z, El-Shafei K, Murad HA (2004) Utilization of xanthan gum and inulin as prebiotics for lactic acid bacteria. In: 9th Egyptian conference for dairy science and technology, Cairo, Egypt. Egyptian Society of Dairy Science, Cairo, pp 269–283Google Scholar
  31. Salmon CNA, Bailey-Shaw YA, Hibbert S, Green C, Smith AM, Williams LAD (2012) Characterisation of cultivars of Jamaican ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) by HPTLC and HPLC. Food Chem 131:1517–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sayeed MD, Yaser R, Esfandiar R, Hamzeh M, Mehrdad Y, Abbas DP (2016) Effect of using ginger, red and black pepper powder as phytobiotics with proteins probiotic on performance, carcass characteristics and some blood biochemical on Japanese quails. Sch J Agric Sci 6:120–125Google Scholar
  33. Shirkhani M, Madadlou A, Khosrowshahi A (2015) Enzymatic modification to stabilize the fermented milk drink, Doogh. J Texture Stud 46:22–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Singh PK, Kaur IP (2011) Synbiotic (probiotic and ginger extract) loaded floating beads: a novel therapeutic option in an experimental paradigm of gastric ulcer. J Pharm Pharmacol 64:207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Steffe JF (1996) Rheological methods in food process engineering, 2nd edn. Freeman Press, East LansingGoogle Scholar
  36. Tuorila H, Martello AV (2002) Consumer response to a flavour in juice in the presence of specific health claims. Food Qual Prefer 13:561–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yilmaz-Ersan L, Ozcan T, Akpinar-Bayizit A (2017) Impact of some gums on the growth and activity of Bifidobacterium Animalis subsp. lactis. Int J Food Eng 3:73–77Google Scholar
  38. Ziaolhagh SH, Jalali H (2017) Physicochemical properties and survivability of probiotics in bio-Doogh containing wild thyme essence and xanthan gum. Int Food Res J 24:1805–1810Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, North Tehran BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Lahijan BranchIslamic Azad UniversityLahijanIran

Personalised recommendations