Advertisement

Journal of Food Science and Technology

, Volume 57, Issue 1, pp 293–300 | Cite as

Chemometric approach based characterization and selection of mid-early cauliflower for bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity

  • B. Vanlalneihi
  • Partha SahaEmail author
  • P. Kalia
  • Sarika Jaiswal
  • Aditi Kundu
  • N. D. Saha
  • Shrawan Singh Sirowa
  • Naveen Singh
Original Article
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

The present study was aimed to analyse bioactive compounds (total phenolics, ascorbic acid and sinigrin) and antioxidant activity in 14 mid-early cauliflower genotypes. Significant differences (pb 0.05) were observed among the genotypes for all bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity. Total phenolics content of curd were ranged from 20.36 to 48.93 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE) 100 g−1 fresh weight (FW) which showed 2.5 times variation. The ascorbic acid content was maximum in DC522 (88.53 mg 100 g−1 FW) followed by Pusa Sharad (65.64 mg 100 g−1 FW) while minimum in DC310 (39.62 65.64 mg 100 g−1 FW). Wide variation was observed for cupric reducing antioxidant capacity and ferric reducing antioxidant power ranging from 9.04 to 20.83 mg GAE 100 g−1 FW and 13.11 to 26.31 mg GAE 100 g−1 FW, respectively. Sinigrin was found to be highest in DC306 (39.50 µmol 100 g−1 FW) for leaf and in DC326 (36.93 µmol 100 g−1 FW) for curd sample. The cauliflower genotypes were classified based on chemometric approaches namely principal component analysis (PCA) and agglomerative hierarchical clustering (AHC). The first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) explained 50.62% and 23.28% of total variance, respectively. The AHC as revealed by heat map classified cauliflower genotypes into four main groups based on measured traits. The information is useful for developing varieties and/or hybrids rich in bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity.

Keywords

Cauliflower Bioactive compounds Antioxidant PCA AHC 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to Head, Division of Vegetable Science, Division of Agricultural Chemicals, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India for proving field and laboratory facility during the work.

References

  1. Amensour M, Bouhdid S, Fernandez-Lopez J, Idaomar M, Senhaji NS, Abrini J (2010) Antibacterial activity of extracts of Myrtus communis against food-borne pathogenic and spoilage bacteria. Int J Food Prop 13:1215–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apak R, Güçlü K, Özyürek M, Karademir SE (2004) Novel total antioxidant capacity index for dietary polyphenols and vitamins C and E, using their cupric ion reducing capability in the presence of neocuproine: CUPRAC method. J Agric Food Chem 52:7970–7981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benzie IF, Strain JJ (1996) The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem 239:70–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhandari SR, Kwak JH (2014) Seasonal variation in phytochemicals and antioxidant activities in different tissues of various broccoli cultivars. Afr J Biotechnol 13:604–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhandari RS, Kwak JH (2015) Chemical composition and antioxidant activity in different tissues of Brassica vegetables. Molecules 20:1228–1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cartea ME, Francisco M, Soengas P, Velasco P (2011) Phenolic compounds in Brassica vegetables. Molecules 16:251–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chipurura B, Muchuweti M, Manditseraa F (2010) Effects of thermal treatment on the phenolic content and antioxidant activity of some vegetables. Asia J Clin Nutr 2:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cruz AG, Cadena RS, Alvaro MBVB, Sant’Ana AS, Oliveira CAF, Faria JAF (2013) Assessing the use of different chemometric techniques to discriminate low-fat and full-fat yogurts. LWT Food Sci Technol 50:210–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davey MW, Van Montagu M, Inzé D, Sanmartin M, Kanellis A, Smirnoff N (2000) Plant l-ascorbic acid: chemistry, function, metabolism, bioavailability and effects of processing. J Sci Food Agric 80:825–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deng GF, Lin X, Xu XR, Gao LL, Xie JF, Li HB (2013) Antioxidant capacities and total phenolic contents of 56 vegetables. J Funct Foods 5:260–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferreres F, Sousa C, Valentão P, Seabra RM, Pereira JA, Andrade PB (2007) Tronchuda cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. costata DC) seeds: phytochemical characterization and antioxidant potential. Food Chem 101:549–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Girgin N, El SN (2015) Effects of cooking on in vitro sinigrin bioaccessibility, total phenols, antioxidant and antimutagenic activity of cauliflower (Brassica oleraceae L. var. botrytis). J Food Compost Anal 37:119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gliszczynska-Swiglo A, Ciska E, Pawlak-Lemanska K, Chmielewski J, Borkowski T, Tyrakowska B (2006) Changes in the content of health-promoting compounds and antioxidant activity of broccoli after domestic processing. Food Addit Contam 23:1088–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Granato D, Katayama FCU, Castro IA (2010) Assessing the association between phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of Brazilian red wines using chemometrics. LWT Food Sci Technol 43:1542–1549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gratacos-Cubarsi M, Ribas-Agusti A, Garcia-Regueiro JA, Castellari M (2010) Simultaneous evaluation of intact glucosinolates and phenolic compounds by UPLC-DAD-MS/MS in Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis. Food Chem 121:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grussu D, Stewart D, Mc Dougall GJ (2011) Berry polyphenols inhibit α-amylase in vitro: identifying active components in rowanberry and raspberry. J Agric Food Chem 59:2324–2331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jagota SK, Dani HM (1982) A new colorimetric technique for the estimation of vitamin C using Folin phenol reagent. Anal Biochem 127:178–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jahangir M, Kim HK, Choi YH, Verpoorte R (2009) Health affecting compounds in Brassicaceae. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 8:31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson RA, Wichern D (2007) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 6th edn. Printice Hall Publication, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaur C, Nagal S, Nishad J, Kumar R (2014) Evaluating eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) genotypes for bioactive properties: a chemometric approach. Food Res Int 60:205–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kwon YI, Apostolidis E, Shetty K (2008) In vitro studies of eggplant (Solanum melongena) phenolics as inhibitors of key enzymes relevant for type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Bioresour Technol 99:2981–2988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumar M, Sharma SR, Kalia P, Saha P (2011) Genetic variability and character association for yield and quality traits in early maturing Indian cauliflowers. Indian J Hort 68:206–211Google Scholar
  23. Lee JG, Kwak JH, Um YC, Lee SG, Jang YA, Choi CS (2012) Variation of glucosinolate contents among domestic broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) accessions. Korean J Hortic Sci Technol 30:743–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lo Scalzo R, Bianchi G, Genna A, Summa C (2007) Antioxidant properties and lipidic profile as quality indexes of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) in relation to harvest time. Food Chem 100:1019–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Malick CP, Singh MB (1980) Phenolics. In: Plant enzymology and histoenzymology. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, p 286Google Scholar
  26. NHB (2016) National horticulture database. National Horticultural Board, Gurugram, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, India. www.nhb.gov.in
  27. Picchi V, Migliori C, Scalzo RL, Campanelli G, Ferrari V, Di Cesare LF (2012) Phytochemical content in organic and conventionally grown Italian cauliflower. Food Chem 130:501–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Razis AFA, Noor NM (2013) Cruciferous vegetables: dietary phytochemicals for cancer prevention. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 14:1565–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saeed N, Khan MR, Shabbir M (2012) Antioxidant activity, total phenolic and total flavonoid contents of whole plant extracts Torilis leptophylla L. BMC Complement Altern Med 12:221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Scalfi L, Fogliano V, Pentagelo A, Graziani G, Giordano I, Ritieni A (2000) Antioxidant activity and general fruit characteristics in different ecotypes of Corbarini small tomatoes. J Agric Food Chem 48:363–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Singh R, Sharma SR (2003) Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis). In: Thamburaj S, Singh N (eds) Vegetables, tubercrops and spices. Directorate of information and publications of agriculture. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp 76–97Google Scholar
  32. Smirnoff N (1996) The function and metabolism of ascorbic acid in plants. Ann Bot 78:661–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sun T, Simon PW, Tanumihardjo SA (2009) Antioxidant phytochemicals and antioxidant capacity of biofortified carrots (Daucus carota L.) of various colors. J Agric Food Chem 57:4142–4147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tsao R, Yu Q, Potter J, Chiba M (2002) Direct and simultaneous analysis of sinigrin and allyl isothiocyanate in mustard samples by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Agric Food Chem 50:4749–4753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Volden J, Bengtsson G, Wicklund T (2009) Glucosinolates, l-ascorbic acid, total phenols, anthocyanins, antioxidant capacities and colour in cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. ssp. botrytis); effects of long-term freezer storage. Food Chem 112:967–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Vegetable ScienceICAR-Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural ResearchBengaluruIndia
  3. 3.ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia
  4. 4.Division of Agricultural ChemicalsICAR-Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia
  5. 5.CESCRA, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia
  6. 6.Division of GeneticsICAR-Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations