Journal of Food Science and Technology

, Volume 57, Issue 1, pp 143–151 | Cite as

The effect of active coating and refrigerated storage on the quality of avocado cultivar, Quintal

  • Ítalo Careli-GondimEmail author
  • Taciene Carvalho Mesquita
  • Eduardo Valério de Barros Vilas Boas
  • Márcio Caliari
  • Manoel Soares Soares Júnior
Original Article


Postharvest technologies, such as the application of coatings, could contribute to the extension of the shelf life of avocado fruit. The objective of the present research was to evaluate the effects of coating, based on agro-industrial co-products (citrus pectin, broken rice grain flour, and cellulosic rice skin nanofiber), sorbitol and potassium sorbate, on the quality of avocado (cultivar ‘Quintal’) stored under refrigeration. The coating contributed to a longer conservation of the green color of avocado, both peel and pulp, and significantly reducing the respiration rate of the coated fruit, which was 35% lower than that of the control fruit. The coated fruit was firmer and, possibly, the addition of cellulosic nanofiber contributed to the maintenance of this firmness. Regarding the bioactive compounds, there was no difference (p > 0.05) among the coated and control fruit. During refrigerated storage, total phenolic compounds content increased (p < 0.05) from 311.44 ± 25.89 to 800.25 ± 160.74 mg kg−1 gallic acid equivalents (GAE) in the control fruit, and from 242.86 ± 52.33 to 584.75 ± 125.57 mg kg−1 GAE in the coated fruit. It was concluded that the shelf life of avocado (cultivar ‘Quintal’) could be extended and ripening delayed by a minimum of 8 days, by applying a coating formulated with rice flour, pectin, sorbitol, potassium sorbate, and cellulosic rice skin nanofiber.


Persea americana Mill. Respiration rate Firmness Antioxidant activity Phenolic compounds 



The authors are grateful to CAPES for the scholarship awarded, to the Academic Cooperation Program (PROCAD Project 8881.068456/2014-01), FAPEG, FAPEMIG, and CNPq for financial support, and to the Federal Universities of Goiás and Lavras for their scientific support.

Supplementary material

13197_2019_4039_MOESM1_ESM.docx (23 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 23 kb)


  1. Baldino L, Cardea S, Reverchon E (2016) Production of antimicrobial membranes loaded with potassium sorbate using a supercritical phase separation process. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 34:77–85. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Besbes I, Vilar MR, Boufi S (2011) Nanofibrillated cellulose from Alfa, Eucalyptus and Pine fibres: preparation, characteristics and reinforcing potential. Carbohydr Polym 86:1198–1206. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bitter T, Muir HM (1973) A modified uronic acid carbazole reaction. Anal Biochem 4:330–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonora A, Pancaldi S, Gualandri R, Fasulo MP (2000) Carotenoid and ultrastructure variations in plastids of Arum italicum Miller fruit during maturation and ripening. J Exp Bot 51:873–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calderón-Oliver M, Escalona-Buendía HB, Medina-Campos ON et al (2016) Optimization of the antioxidant and antimicrobial response of the combined effect of nisin and avocado byproducts. LWT Food Sci Technol 65:46–52. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chitarra MIF, Chitarra AB (2005) Fruit and vegetable postharvest: physiology and handling, 2nd edn. Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA), LavrasGoogle Scholar
  7. Costa C, Lucera A, Conte A et al (2011) Effects of passive and active modified atmosphere packaging conditions on ready-to-eat table grape. J Food Eng 102:115–121. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coutinho MDO, Barbosa JB, Talma SV et al (2015) Effect of starch based coating in the preservation of avocado fruit (Persea americana) at ambient temperature. J Fruits Veg 1:49–52Google Scholar
  9. Cowan AK, Wolstenholme BN (2016) Avocado. In: Caballero B, Finglas PM, Toldra F (eds) Encyclopedia of food and health. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 294–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daiuto ÉR, Tremocoldi MA, de Alencar SM et al (2014) Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of the pulp, peel and by products of avocado “Hass”. Rev Bras Frutic 36:417–424. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Del Aguila JS, Sasaki FF, Heiffig LS et al (2006) Fresh-cut radish using different cut types and storage temperatures. Postharvest Biol Technol 40:149–154. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dische E (1962) Color ractions of carbohydrates. In: Whistler RL, Wolfrom ML, BeMiller JN, Shafizadeh F (eds) Methods in carbohydrate chemistry. Academic Press, New York, pp 477–512Google Scholar
  13. Engel VL, Poggiani F (1991) Study of foliar chlorophyll concentration and its light absorption spectrum as related to shading at the juvenile phase of four native forest tree species. Rev Bras Fisiol Veg 3:39–45Google Scholar
  14. Ghaderi M, Mousavi M, Yousefi H, Labbafi M (2014) All-cellulose nanocomposite film made from bagasse cellulose nanofibers for food packaging application. Carbohydr Polym 104:59–65. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gonzalez-Aguilar GA, Villa-Rodriguez JA, Ayala-Zavala JF et al (2010) Improvement of the antioxidant status of tropical fruits as a secondary response to some postharvest treatments. Trends Food Sci Technol 21:475–482. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hashemi SMB, Khaneghah AM (2017) Characterization of novel basil-seed gum active edible films and coatings containing oregano essential oil. Prog Org Coat 110:35–41. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johar N, Ahmad I, Dufresne A (2012) Extraction, preparation and characterization of cellulose fibres and nanocrystals from rice husk. Ind Crops Prod 37:93–99. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumar R, Ghoshal G, Goyal M (2019) Synthesis and functional properties of gelatin/CA-starch composite film: excellent food packaging material. J Food Sci Technol 56:1954–1965. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Larrauri JA, Rupérez P, Saura-Calixto F (1997) Effect of drying temperature on the stability of polyphenols and antioxidant activity of red grape pomace peels. J Agric Food Chem 45:1390–1393. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee SK, Kader AA (2000) Preharvest and postharvest factors influencing vitamin C content of horticultural crops. Postharvest Biol Technol 20:207–220. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marathe SA, Rajalakshmi V, Jamdar SN, Sharma A (2011) Comparative study on antioxidant activity of different varieties of commonly consumed legumes in India. Food Chem Toxicol 49:2005–2012. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Martínez-Romero D, Zapata PJ, Guillén F et al (2017) The addition of rosehip oil to Aloe gels improves their properties as postharvest coatings for maintaining quality in plum. Food Chem 217:585–592. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. McCready PM, McComb EA (1952) Extraction and determination of total pectic material. Anal Chem 24:1586–1588. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakatsuka A, Maruo T, Ishibashi C et al (2011) Expression of genes encoding xyloglucan endotransglycosylase/hydrolase in ‘Saijo’ persimmon fruit during softening after deastringency treatment. Postharvest Biol Technol 62:89–92. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oliveira AR, Ribeiro AEC, Oliveira ÉR et al (2019) Broken rice grains pregelatinized flours incorporated with lyophilized açaí pulp and the effect of extrusion on their physicochemical properties. J Food Sci Technol. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Paliyath G, Murr DP, Handa AK, Lurie S (2008) Postharvest biology and technology of fruits, vegetables, and flowers. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Payasi A, Mishra NN, Chaves ALS, Singh R (2009) Biochemistry of fruit softening: an overview. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 15:103–113. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Ramful D, Tarnus E, Aruoma OI et al (2011) Polyphenol composition, vitamin C content and antioxidant capacity of Mauritian citrus fruit pulps. Food Res Int 44:2088–2099. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rufino MSM, Alves RE, de Brito ES et al (2007) Scientific methodology: determination of total antioxidant activity in fruits by capture of free radical DPPH. Ministério da Agric Pecuária e Abast 23:1–4. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schaffer B, Wolstenholme BN, Whiley AW (2013) The avocado: botany, production and uses, 2nd edn. Homestead, JacksonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Silva FOR, Ramos JD, Oliveira MC et al (2014) Reproductive phenology and physicochemical characterization of avocado varieties in Carmo da Cachoeira, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rev Ceres 61:105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simões ADN, Tudela JA, Allende A et al (2009) Edible coatings containing chitosan and moderate modified atmospheres maintain quality and enhance phytochemicals of carrot sticks. Postharvest Biol Technol 51:364–370. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Strohecker R, Henning HM (1967) Vitamin analysis: proven methods. Paz Montalvo, MadridGoogle Scholar
  34. Tesfay SZ, Magwaza LS (2017) Evaluating the efficacy of moringa leaf extract, chitosan and carboxymethyl cellulose as edible coatings for enhancing quality and extending postharvest life of avocado (Persea americana Mill.) fruit. Food Packag Shelf Life 11:40–48. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thomas H, Ougham H, Canter P, Donnison I (2002) What stay-green mutants tell us about nitrogen remobilization in leaf senescence. J Exp Bot 53:801–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vizzotto M, Raseira MCB, Pereira MC, Fetter MR (2012) Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of different Genotypes of blackberry (Rubus sp.). Rev Bras Frutic 34:853–858. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang W, Bostic TR, Gu L (2010) Antioxidant capacities, procyanidins and pigments in avocados of different strains and cultivars. Food Chem 122:1193–1198. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Watada A, Abe K, Yamuchi N (1990) Physiological activities of partially processed fruits and vegetables. Food Technol 44:116–122Google Scholar
  39. Waterhouse AL (2002) Polyphenolics: Determination of total phenolics. In: Wrolstad RE (ed) Current protocols in food analytical chemistry. Wiley, New York, pp 111–118Google Scholar
  40. Yahia EM, Woolf AB (2011) Avocado (Persea americana Mill.). In: Yahia EM (ed) Postharvest biology and technology of tropical and subtropical fruits. Volume 2: Açai to citrus, vol 2. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, pp 125–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Engenharia de AlimentosUniversidade Federal de Goiás, UFGGoiâniaBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Ciência dos AlimentosUniversidade Federal de Lavras, UFLALavrasBrazil

Personalised recommendations