Journal of Food Science and Technology

, Volume 56, Issue 4, pp 2115–2125 | Cite as

Effects of sprouting and cooking processes on physicochemical and functional properties of moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia) seed and flour

  • Seema Medhe
  • Surangna Jain
  • Anil K. AnalEmail author
Original Article


Selected moth beans (Vigna aconitifolia) were subjected to different processes such as sprouting and cooking. Their respective flours were prepared and evaluated for their physicochemical and functional characteristics. From our study, it was observed that the ash content of raw moth bean flour was considerably higher in comparison to the sprouted and cooked moth bean flour. On the other hand, the crude lipid and fiber content of sprouted moth bean flour were remarkably higher compared to raw and cooked moth bean flour, respectively. The raw moth bean flour exhibited considerably better emulsifying activity compared to the sprouted moth bean flour. Sprouted bean flour was showing higher emulsion stability than the raw bean flours and the cooked bean flour reported zero emulsion stability. The value of foaming stability was not significantly different among raw and sprouted moth bean, but it was significantly low in cooked moth bean flour. Raw moth bean flour was found to exhibit higher gelation concentration than the sprouted and cooked flours. This study highlights the variations observed in the physicochemical and pasting characteristics of moth bean seeds (raw, sprouted and cooked) and their respective flours.


Sprouted moth bean flours Cooked moth bean flours Emulsion properties Foaming properties Pasting properties 



The author acknowledged scholarship donor Social Justice and Special Assistance Department, Government of Maharashtra, India and Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand to conduct this work.

Supplementary material

13197_2019_3692_MOESM1_ESM.docx (91 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 90 kb)


  1. Ajibola CF, Malomo SA, Fagbemi TN, Aluko RE (2016) Polypeptide composition and functional properties of African yam bean seed (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) albumin, globulin and protein concentrate. Food Hydrocoll 56:189–200. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AOAC (2000) Official method of analysis of AOAC international. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, GaithersburgGoogle Scholar
  3. Benítez V, Cantera S, Aguilera Y, Mollá E, Esteban RM, Díaz MF, Martín-Cabrejas MA (2013) Impact of germination on starch, dietary fiber and physicochemical properties in non-conventional legumes. Food Res Int 50:64–69. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boye J, Zare F, Pletch A (2010) Pulse proteins: processing, characterization, functional properties and applications in food and feed. Food Res Int 43:414–431. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deshpande S, Campbell C (1992) Genotype variation in BOAA, condensed tannins, phenolics and enzyme inhibitors of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus). Can J Plant Sci 72:1037–1047. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dhaliwal Y, Aggarwal R (1999) Composition of fat in soybeans as affected by duration of germination and drying temperature. J Food Sci Technol 36:266–267Google Scholar
  7. Dueñas M, Martínez-Villaluenga C, Limón RI, Peñas E, Frias J (2015) Effect of germination and elicitation on phenolic composition and bioactivity of kidney beans. Food Res Int 70:55–63. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elkhalifa AEO, Bernhardt R (2010) Influence of grain germination on functional properties of sorghum flour. Food Chem 121:387–392. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flores-Farías R, Martínez-Bustos F, Salinas-Moreno Y, Chang YK, Hernandez JG, Ríos E (2000) Physicochemical and rheological characteristics of commercial nixtamalised Mexican maize flours for tortillas. J Sci Food Agric 80:657–664.;2-j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghavidel RA, Prakash J (2006) Effect of germination and dehulling on functional properties of legume flours. J Sci Food Agric 86:1189–1195. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ghavidel RA, Prakash J (2007) The impact of germination and dehulling on nutrients, antinutrients, in vitro iron and calcium bioavailability and in vitro starch and protein digestibility of some legume seeds. LWT Food Sci Technol 40:1292–1299. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghumman A, Kaur A, Singh N (2016) Impact of germination on flour, protein and starch characteristics of lentil (Lens culinari) and horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum L.) lines. LWT Food Sci Technol 65:137–144. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gupta N, Shrivastava N, Singh PK, Bhagyawant SS (2016) Phytochemical evaluation of moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia L.) seeds and their divergence. Biochem Res Int 2016:1–6. Google Scholar
  14. Hamid S, Muzaffar S, Wani IA, Masoodi FA, Bhat MM (2016) Physical and cooking characteristics of two cowpea cultivars grown in temperate Indian climate. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 15:127–134. Google Scholar
  15. Han JJ, Janz JA, Gerlat M (2010) Development of gluten-free cracker snacks using pulse flours and fractions. Food Res Int 43:627–633. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Henshaw FO, McWatters KH, Akingbala JO, Chinnan MS (2003) Thermal properties of cowpea flour: a study by differential scanning calorimetry. Food/Nahrung 47:161–165. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jain AK, Kumar S, Panwar J (2009) Antinutritional factors and their detoxification in pulses—a review. Agric Rev 30:64–70Google Scholar
  18. Kaur S, Singh N, Sodhi NS, Rana JC (2009) Diversity in properties of seed and flour of kidney bean germplasm. Food Chem 117:282–289. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khatoon N, Prakash J (2006) Nutrient retention in microwave cooked germinated legumes. Food Chem 97:115–121. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martín-Cabrejas MA, Díaz MF, Aguilera Y, Benítez V, Mollá E, Esteban RM (2008) Influence of germination on the soluble carbohydrates and dietary fibre fractions in non-conventional legumes. Food Chem 107:1045–1052. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martín-Cabrejas MA, Aguilera Y, Pedrosa MM, Cuadrado C, Hernández T, Díaz S, Esteban RM (2009) The impact of dehydration process on antinutrients and protein digestibility of some legume flours. Food Chem 114:1063–1068. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Megat Rusydi M, Noraliza C, Azrina A, Zulkhairi A (2011) Nutritional changes in germinated legumes and rice varieties. Int Food Res J 18:703–713Google Scholar
  23. Nasrin TAA, Noomhorm A, Anal AK (2015) Physico-chemical characterization of culled plantain pulp starch, peel starch, and flour. Int J Food Prop 18:165–177. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Neto VQ, Narain N, Silva J, Bora P (2001) Functional properties of raw and heat processed cashew nut (Anacardium occidentale, L.) kernel protein isolates. Food/Nahrung 45:258–262.;2-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ohtsubo K, Suzuki K, Yasui Y, Kasumi T (2005) Bio-functional components in the processed pre-germinated brown rice by a twin-screw extruder. J Food Compos Anal 18:303–316. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reyes-Bastidas M, Reyes-Fernández E, López-Cervantes J, Milán-Carrillo J, Loarca-Piña G, Reyes-Moreno C (2010) Physicochemical, nutritional and antioxidant properties of tempeh flour from common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Food Sci Technol Int 16:427–434. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Romano A, Giosafatto C, Masi P, Mariniello L (2015) Impact of dehulling on the physico-chemical properties and in vitro protein digestion of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Food Funct 6:1345–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rui X, Boye JI, Ribereau S, Simpson BK, Prasher SO (2011) Comparative study of the composition and thermal properties of protein isolates prepared from nine Phaseolus vulgaris legume varieties. Food Res Int 44:2497–2504. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seena S, Sridhar K (2005) Physicochemical, functional and cooking properties of under explored legumes, Canavalia of the southwest coast of India. Food Res Int 38:803–814. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sharma S, Singh N, Virdi AS, Rana JC (2015) Himalayan kidney bean germplasm: grain-flour characteristics, structural-functional properties and in vitro digestibility of starches. Food Res Int 77:498–505. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shevkani K, Singh N, Kaur A, Rana JC (2015) Structural and functional characterization of kidney bean and field pea protein isolates: a comparative study. Food Hydrocoll 43:679–689. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siddhuraju P, Becker K (2005) Nutritional and antinutritional composition, in vitro amino acid availability, starch digestibility and predicted glycemic index of differentially processed mucuna beans (Mucuna pruriens var. utilis): an under-utilised legume. Food Chem 91:275–286. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Siddiq M, Ravi R, Harte J, Dolan K (2010) Physical and functional characteristics of selected dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) flours. LWT Food Sci Technol 43:232–237. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Singh N, Kaur M, Sandhu KS, Sodhi NS (2004) Physicochemical, cooking and textural characteristics of some Indian black gram (Phaseolus mungo L.) varieties. J Sci Food Agric 84:977–982. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Świeca M, Gawlik-Dziki U, Kowalczyk D, Złotek U (2012) Impact of germination time and type of illumination on the antioxidant compounds and antioxidant capacity of Lens culinaris sprouts. Sci Hort 140:87–95. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tharanathan R, Mahadevamma S (2003) Grain legumes-a boon to human nutrition. Trends Food Sci Technol 14:507–518. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang N, Hatcher DW, Gawalko EJ (2008) Effect of variety and processing on nutrients and certain anti-nutrients in field peas (Pisum sativum). Food Chem 111:132–138. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang N, Hatcher D, Toews R, Gawalko E (2009) Influence of cooking and dehulling on nutritional composition of several varieties of lentils (Lens culinaris). LWT Food Sci Technol 42:842–848. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wani IA, Sogi DS, Gill BS (2013) Physicochemical and functional properties of flours from three Black gram (Phaseolus mungo L.) cultivars. Int J Food Sci Technol 48:771–777. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food, Agriculture and Bioresources, Food Engineering and Bioprocess TechnologyAsian Institute of TechnologyKhlong LuangThailand
  2. 2.Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of ScienceMahidol UniversityPhutthamonthonThailand

Personalised recommendations