Advertisement

Effect of Brazilian green propolis on microorganism contaminants of surface of Gorgonzola-type cheese

  • Frederico Teixeira CorreaEmail author
  • Angélica Cristina de Souza
  • Ernani Augusto de Souza Júnior
  • Silas Rodrigo Isidoro
  • Roberta Hilsdorf Piccoli
  • Disney Ribeiro Dias
  • Luiz Ronaldo de Abreu
Original Article
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

Blue cheeses are susceptible to yeast and bacterial growth on their surface, which causes spoilage during ripening process and the formation of slime. The dairy industry frequently control the proliferation of undesirable microorganisms with natamycin and high salt concentration. The green propolis is a complex of substances that presents antimicrobial properties with great potential as preservative in the food industry. The aims of the present study were to identify the mesophilic aerobic microorganisms present on the surface of Gorgonzola-type cheese, evaluate the antifungal and antibacterial effects of the ethanol extract of green propolis (EEP) on the development of those microorganisms and verify the effects of EEP on the sensory quality of cheese. Ten yeast species belonging to genera Yarrowia, Candida, Debaryomyces and Saccharomyces were identified, as well as seven species of bacteria belonging to genera Staphylococcus, Bacillus, Enterococcus, Corynebacterium and Proteus. The EEP showed minimum biocide concentration (MBC), between 0.3% (weight/weight) and 5% for Bacillus cereus and Proteus vulgaris, respectively. Saccharomyces cerevisiae was the most sensitive species (MBC of 0.63%) and Candida parapsilosis the most resistant one (MBC of 5%). In the sensory analysis, the cheeses involved with EEP at 5% concentration did not differ from the control, while at 10%, there was a slight decrease in acceptance. The EEP has potential and feasibility to be used in Gorgonzola-type cheese, inhibiting the main bacteria and yeasts without affecting largely the sensory characteristics of the product.

Keywords

Green propolis Gorgonzola-type cheese Antimicrobial activity Natamycin Sensory analysis 

Notes

References

  1. Abubakar MB, Abdullah WZ, Sulaiman SA, Ang BS (2014) Polyphenols as key players for the antileukaemic effects of propolis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 1:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aga H, Shibuya T, Sugimoto T, Kurimoto M, Nakajima SH (1994) Isolation and identification of antimicrobial compounds in Brazilian propolis. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 58:945–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alibi S, Ferjani A, Boukadida F (2016) Implication of Corynebacterium species in food’s contamination. J Coast Life Med 9:123–156Google Scholar
  4. Almeida M et al (2014) Construction of a dairy microbial genome catalog opens new perspectives for the metagenomic analysis of dairy fermented products. BMC Genomics 15:1101–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amorim JC, Schwan RF, Duarte WF (2016) Sugar cane spirit (cachaça): effects of mixed inoculum of yeasts on the sensory and chemical characteristics. Food Res Int 85:76–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banjara N, Suhr MJ, Hallen-Adams HE (2015) Diversity of yeast and mold species from a variety of cheese types. Curr Microbiol 70(6):792–800.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-015-0790-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ceugniez A, Drider D, Jacques P, Coucheney F (2015) Yeast diversity in a traditional French cheese “Tomme d’Orchies” reveals infrequent and frequent species with associated benefits. Food Microbiol 53:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chun H, Kim J, Chung K, Won M, Song KB (2009) Inactivation kinetics of Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, and Campylobacter jejuni in ready-to-eat sliced ham using UV-C irradiation. Meat Sci 83:599–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cocolin L, Numera D, Alessandria V, Rantsiou K, Dolci P, Grassi MA, Lomanaco S, Civera T (2009) Microbial ecology of Gorgonzola rinds and occurrence of different biotypes of Listeria monocytogenes. Int J Food Microbiol 31:200–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Correa FT, van Mullem JJ, Correa PT, Abreu LR, Carneiro JDS, Pinto SM (2018) Development of cheese wrapped in barks of reforestation trees. J Culin Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15428052.2018.1509755 Google Scholar
  11. Costa SS, Druzian JI, Machado BAS, Souza SO, Guimarães AG (2014) Bi-functional biobased packing of the cassava starch, glycerol, licuri nanocellulose and red propolis. PLoS ONE 9:e112554.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112554 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dalhoff AAH, Levy SB (2015) Does use of the polyene natamycin as a food preservative jeopardise the clinical efficacy of amphotericin B? A word of concern. Int J Antimicrob Agents 45:564–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dias DR, Schwan RF (2010) Isolamento e identificação de leveduras. In: Moreira FMS, Huising EJ, Bignell DE (eds) Manual de Biologia dos Solos Tropicais - Amostragem e Caracterização da Biodiversidade, vol 1, pp 227–277Google Scholar
  14. El-Diasty E, El-Kaseh R, Salem R (2008) The effect of natamycin on keeping quality and organoleptic characters of yoghurt. Arab J Biotechnol 12(1):41–48Google Scholar
  15. Eliskases-Lechner F, Ginzinger W (1995) The yeast flora of surface-ripened cheeses. Milchwissenschaft 50:458–462Google Scholar
  16. Farnesi AP, Aquino-Ferreira R, Jong D, Bastos JK, Soares AEE (2009) Effects of stingless bee and honey bee propolis on four species of bacteria. Genet Mol Res 8:635–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferreira DF (2011) Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciênc e Agrotec 35:1039–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Figueiredo FJB et al (2015) Physicochemical characterization and flavonoid contents of artisanal Brazilian green propolis. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 7:64–68Google Scholar
  19. Flemming HC, Neu T, Wingender J (2016) The perfect slime: microbial extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). IWA Publishing, London, p 336pGoogle Scholar
  20. García-Lafuente A, Guillamón E, Villares A, Rostagno MA, Martínez JA (2009) Flavonoids as anti-inflammatory agents: implications in cancer and cardiovascular disease. Inflamm Res 58:537–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Instituto Adolfo Lutz (2008) Métodos físico-químicos para análise de alimentos/coordenadores Odair Zenebon, Neus Sadocco Pascuet e Paulo Tiglea. São Paulo, Brazil 1:100–620Google Scholar
  22. Irlinger F, Bergere JL (1999) Use of conventional biochemical tests and analyses of ribotype patterns for classification of micrococci isolated from dairy products. J Dairy Res 66:91–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lima CDLC, Lima LA, Cerqueira MMOP, Ferreira EG, Rosa CA (2009) Lactic acid bacteria and yeasts associated with the artisanal Minas cheese produced in the region of Serra do Salitre, Minas Gerais. Arq Bras de Med Vet e Zootec 61:266–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mendoza LM, Padilla B, Belloch C, Vignolo G (2014) Diversity and enzymatic profile of yeast isolated from traditional llama meat sausages from north-western Andean region of Argentina. Food Res Int 62:572–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mounier J, Monnet C, Jacques N, Vallaeys T, Arditi R, Sarthou AS, Hélias A, Irlinger F (2008) Microbial interactions within a cheese microbial community. ASM 74:172–181Google Scholar
  26. Niedermeyer THJ, Strohalm M (2012) Mass as a software tool for the annotation of cyclic peptide tandem mass spectra. PLoS ONE 7(9):e44913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ozturk I, Sagdic O (2014) Biodiversity of yeast mycobiota in “sucuk,” a traditional Turkish fermented dry sausage: phenotypic and genotypic identification, functional and technological properties. J Food Sci 79:2315–2322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Park KY, Ikegaki M (1998) Praparation of water and ethanolic extracts of propolis and evaluations of the preparations. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 62(11):2230–2232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rehman S, Reehana K, Khursheed AB, Alsaba FR, Abdul SS, Mohd SA (2010) Isolation, characterisation and antibacterial activity studies of coumarins from Rhododendron lepidotum Wall. ex G. Don, Ericaceae. Braz J Pharm 20(6):886–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Resa CPO, Jagus RJ, Gerscheson LN (2014) Natamycin efficiency for controlling yeast growth in models systems and on cheese surfaces. Food Control 35:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Righi AA, Negri G, Salatino A (2013) Comparative chemistry of propolis from eight Brazilian localities. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 15:12.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/267878 Google Scholar
  32. Santurio DF, Costa MM, Maboni G, Cavalheiro CP, Sá MF, Pozzo M, Alves SH, Fries LLM (2011) Atividade antimicrobiana de óleos essenciais de condimentos frente a amostras de Escherichia coli isoladas de aves e bovinos. Ciênc Rur 41(6):1051–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Senguna IY, Nielsen DS, Karapinar M, Jakobsen M (2009) Identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Tarhana, a traditional Turkish fermented food. Int J Food Microbiol 135:105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Silici S, Kutluca S (2005) Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of propolis collected by three different races of honeybees in the same region. J Ethnopharmacol 99:69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thomas LV, Ingram- RE, Bevis HE, Brightwell P, Wilson N, Delves-Broughton J (2005) Natamycin control of yeast spoilage of wine. Food Prot Trends 25:510–517Google Scholar
  36. Tosi EA, Ré E, Ortega ME, Cazzoli AF (2007) Food preservative based on propolis: bacteriostatic activity of propolis polyphenols and flavonoids upon Escherichia coli. Food Chem 104:1025–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wagh VD (2013) Propolis: a wonder bees product and its pharmacological potentials. Adv Pharm Sci 5:145–172Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frederico Teixeira Correa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Angélica Cristina de Souza
    • 2
  • Ernani Augusto de Souza Júnior
    • 3
  • Silas Rodrigo Isidoro
    • 1
  • Roberta Hilsdorf Piccoli
    • 1
  • Disney Ribeiro Dias
    • 1
  • Luiz Ronaldo de Abreu
    • 1
  1. 1.Departament of Food ScienceFederal University of LavrasLavrasBrazil
  2. 2.Departament of BiologyFederal University of LavrasLavrasBrazil
  3. 3.Departament of Human ScienceFederal University of LavrasLavrasBrazil

Personalised recommendations