Advertisement

Journal of Food Science and Technology

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 1130–1139 | Cite as

Immobilised native plant cysteine proteases: packed-bed reactor for white wine protein stabilisation

  • Ilaria BenucciEmail author
  • Claudio Lombardelli
  • Katia Liburdi
  • Giuseppe Acciaro
  • Matteo Zappino
  • Marco Esti
Original Article

Abstract

This research presents a feasibility study of using a continuous packed-bed reactor (PBR), containing immobilised native plant cysteine proteases, as a specific and mild alternative technique relative to the usual bentonite fining for white wine protein stabilisation. The operational parameters for a PBR containing immobilised bromelain (PBR-br) or immobilised papain (PBR-pa) were optimised using model wine fortified with synthetic substrate (Bz-Phe-Val-Arg-pNA). The effectiveness of PBR-br, both in terms of hazing potential and total protein decrease, was significantly higher than PBR-pa, in all the seven unfined, white wines used. Among the wines tested, Sauvignon Blanc, given its total protein content as well as its very high intrinsic instability, was selected as a control wine to evaluate the effect of the treatment on wine as to its soluble protein profile, phenolic composition, mineral component, and sensory properties. The treatment in a PBR containing immobilised bromelain appeared effective in decreasing both wine hazing potential and total protein amount, while it did not significantly affect the phenol compounds, the mineral component nor the sensory quality of wine. The enzymatic treatment in PBR was shown to be a specific and mild technique for use as an alternative to bentonite fining for white wine protein stabilisation.

Keywords

Native plant cysteine proteases Chitosan beads Covalent immobilisation Packed-bed reactor Wine hazing potential Total wine proteins 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by the financial backing of the Italian Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Forestry.

Supplementary material

13197_2015_2125_MOESM1_ESM.docx (383 kb)
Table 1S (DOCX 382 kb)
13197_2015_2125_MOESM2_ESM.docx (858 kb)
Figure 1S (DOCX 858 kb)

References

  1. Bayly FC, Berg HW (1967) Grape and wine proteins of white wine varietals. Am J Enol Vitic 18:18–32Google Scholar
  2. Benucci I, Esti M, Liburdi K (2014) Effect of free and immobilised stem bromelain on protein haze in white wine. Aust J Grape Wine Res 20:347–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benucci I, Esti M, Liburdi K, Garzillo AMV (2012) Pineapple stem bromelain immobilized on different supports: catalytic properties in model wine. Biotechnol Prog 28:1472–1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benucci I, Esti M, Lombardelli C, Liburdi K, Garzillo AMV (2013) Papain from papaya (Carica papaya L.) fruit and latex: preliminary characterization in alcoholic–acidic buffer for wine application. Food bioprod Process 91:595–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benucci I, Liburdi K, Garzillo AMV, Esti M (2011) Bromelain from pineapple stem in alcoholic-acidic buffers for wine application. Food Chem 124:1349–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binging. Anal Biochem 72:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabello-Pasini A, Victoria-Cota N, Marcias-Carranza V, Hernadez-Garibay E, Muniz-Salazar R (2005) Clarification if wines using polysaccharides extracted from seaweeds. Aust J Grape Wine Res 56:52–59Google Scholar
  8. Catarino S, Madeira M, Monteiro F, Rocha F, Curvelo-Garcia AS, Bruno de Sousa R (2008) Effect of bentonite characteristics on the elemental composition of wine. J Agric Food Chem 56:158–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Esti M, Benucci I, Liburdi K, Garzillo AMV (2011) Effect of wine inhibitors on free pineapple stem bromelain activity in a model wine system. J Agric Food Chem 59:3391–3397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission, 1990. Commission regulation (EEC) no 2676/90 of 17 September 1990 determining community methods for the analysis of wines. o j l 272, 1–192.Google Scholar
  11. Falconer RJ, Marangon M, Van Sluyter SC, Neilson KA, Chan C, Waters EJ (2010) Thermal stability of thaumatin-like protein, chitinase, and invertase isolated from sauvignon Blanc and Semillon juice and their role in haze formation in wine. J Agric Food Chem 58:975–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferreira RB, Picarra-Pereira MA, Monteiro S, Loureiro VB, Teixeira AR (2002) The wine proteins. Trends Food Sci Technol 12:230–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gautam SS, Mishra SK, Dash V, Goyal AK, Rath G (2010) Comparative study of extraction, purification and estimation of bromelain from stem and fruit of pineapple plant. Thai Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 34:67–76Google Scholar
  14. Gump BM, Huang CF (1999) Removal of unstable protein in grape juice and wine by adsorbents resins. California Agricultural Technology Institute, Publications n 990402Google Scholar
  15. Hale LP, Greer PK, Trinh CT, James CL (2005) Proteinase activity and stability of natural bromelain preparations. Int Immunopharmacol 5:783–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural protein during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laudani CG, Habulin M, Knez Z, Della Porta G, Reverchon E (2007) Immobilized lipase-mediated long-chain fatty acid esterification in dense carbon dioxide: bench-scale packed-bed reactor study. J Supercrit Fluids 41:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Le Bourse D, Conreux A, Villaume S, Lameiras P, Nuzillard JM, Jeandet P (2011) Quantification of chitinase and thaumatin-like proteins in grape juices and wines. Anal Bioanal Chem 401:1541–1549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marangon M, Lucchetta M, Waters EJ (2011a) Protein stabilization of white wines using zirconium dioxide enclosed in a metallic cage. Aust J Grape Wine Res 17:28–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marangon M, Van Sluyter SC, Neilson KA, Chan C, Haynes PA, Waters EJ, Falconer RJ (2011b) Roles of grape thaumatin-like protein and chitinase in white wine haze formation. J Agric Food Chem 59:733–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marangon M, Van Sluyter SC, Robinson EM, Muhlack RA, Holt HE, Haynes PA, Godden PW, Smith PA, Waters EJ (2012) Degradation of white wine haze proteins by aspergillopepsin I and II during juice flash pasteurization. Food Chem 135:1157–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller GC, Amon JM, Gibson RL, Simpson RF (1985) Loss of aroma attribute to protein stabilization with bentonite or ultrafiltration. Aust N Z Grapegrow Winemak 256:52–59Google Scholar
  23. Modra EJ, Williams PJ (1988) Are proteases active in wines e juices. Aust N Z Grapegrow Winemak 292:42–46Google Scholar
  24. Moine-Ledoux V, Dubourdieu D (1999) An invertase fragment responsible for improving the protein stability of dry white wines. J Sci Food Agric 79:537–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moretti RH, Berg HW (1965) Variability among wines to protein clouding. Am J Enol Vitic 16:69–78Google Scholar
  26. Onofri A (2006) Enhancing excel capability to perform statistical analyses in agriculture applied research. In: In computational statistics and data analysis - statistical software newsletters, eds. Association for statistical Computing, InternationalGoogle Scholar
  27. O.I.V. Office International de la Vigne et du Vin (2011) Compendium of international methods of wine and must analysis. France, ParisGoogle Scholar
  28. Pashova V, Guell C, Lòpez F (2004) White wine continous protein stabilization by packed column. J Agric Food Chem 52:1558–1563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pocock KF, Rankine BC (1973) Heat test for detecting protein instability in wine. Australian Wine, Brewing and Spirit Review 91(5):42–43Google Scholar
  30. Pocock KF, Høj PB, Adams KS, Kwiatkowski MJ, Waters EJ (2003) Combined heat and proteolytic enzyme treatment of white wines reduce haze forming protein content without detrimental effect. Aust J Grape Wine Res 9:56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sauvage FX, Bach B, Moutounet M, Vernhet A (2010) Proteins in white wines: thermo-sensitivity and differential adsorbtion by bentonite. Food Chem 118:26–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. UNI EN ISO 10399 (2010). Sensory analysis - Methodology - Duo- trio test.Google Scholar
  33. Vincenzi S, Marangon M, Tolin S, Curioni A (2011) Protein evolution during the early stages of white winemaking and its relations with wine stability. Aust J Grape Wine Res 17:20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Watanabe Y, Miyawaki Y, Adachi S, Nakanishi K, Matsuno R (2001) Continuous production of acyl mannoses by immobilized lipase using a packed-bed reactor and their surfactant properties. Biochem Eng J 8:213–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Waters EJ, Alexander G, Muhlack R, Pocock KF, Colby C, O’Neill BK, Høj PB, Jones P (2005) Preventing protein haze in bottled white wine. Aust J Grape Wine Res 11:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xia YM, Fang Y, Xu ZG, Hu XY, Shen YA, Brown JJ (2004) A novel process for enzymatic synthesis of N-lauroyl-β-amino propionitrile using a packed bed reactor coupled with on-line separation. J Mol Catal B Enzym 31:111–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilaria Benucci
    • 1
    Email author
  • Claudio Lombardelli
    • 1
  • Katia Liburdi
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Acciaro
    • 1
  • Matteo Zappino
    • 1
  • Marco Esti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest SystemsUniversity of TusciaViterboItaly

Personalised recommendations