Journal of Food Science and Technology

, Volume 52, Issue 1, pp 335–342 | Cite as

Influence of 1-MCP treatments on eating quality and consumer preferences of ‘Qinmei’ kiwifruit during shelf life

  • Lei Deng
  • Cai-Zhong Jiang
  • Wenliang Mu
  • Qingguo Wang
Original Article


In recent years, some Chinese distributors said that 1-MCP treated kiwifruit were difficult to ripen and that the eating quality was reduced. This paper addresses whether these problems exists or not, determines the quality parameters affecting consumer preferences and reevaluates the necessity of 1-MCP application for storage of kiwifruit. ‘Qinmei’ kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa C.F. Liang et A.R. Ferguson) harvested at three ripening stages were treated with 0.5, 0.75, 1.0 or 1.5 μLL−1 1-MCP before cold storage. The results showed that for the fruit harvested at two higher ripening stages, 1-MCP treatment reduced decay incidence after 12 days shelf life following 90 days cold storage, and the percentage of decayed fruit for 1-MCP treatment was much lower than control after 150 days storage as well as on subsequent shelf life no matter what the ripening stage was. After decayed fruit was removed from all the treatments, fruit treated with 1-MCP displayed a lower consumer acceptance, especially at higher concentrations, compared with control during shelf life. This indicated 1-MCP treated fruit presented lower eating quality compared to control fruit during the shelf life. Excessive sourness, but not firmness or soluble solids was the main factor decreasing the taste of kiwifruit treated with 1-MCP. Fruit softening was delayed by all dosages of 1-MCP. However, the higher firmness showed no significant negative effect on eating quality. 1-MCP had no influence on soluble solids content after the cold storage or during shelf life. Our study demonstrated that utilization of lower concentration of 1-MCP up to 1 μLL−1 for ‘Qinmei’ kiwifruit with intended storage of 150 days was necessary, but not for 90 days storage of fruit harvested at low ripening stage (harvested at 6.4 % SSC).


Kiwifruit Eating quality 1-methylcyclopropene Titratable acidity Shelf life Storage 


  1. Blankenship S, Dole J (2003) 1-Methylcyclopropene: a review. Postharvest Biol Technol 28:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boquete E, Trinchero G, Fraschina A, Vilella F, Sozzi G (2004) Ripening of ‘Hayward’kiwifruit treated with 1-methylcyclopropene after cold storage. Postharvest Biol Technol 32:57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlos H, Crisosto C, Garner D (2001) 1-MCP inhibits kiwifruit softening during storage. Perishables Handl Q 108:19–20Google Scholar
  4. Colelli G, Amodio M (2003) Effects of 1-methylcyclopropene treatments on whole and fresh-cut kiwifruits; Effetti del trattamento con 1-MCP di frutti di actinidia interi ea fette [1-metilciclopropene]. Rivista di Frutticoltura e di Ortofloricoltura 65:61–67Google Scholar
  5. Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM (2001) Understanding consumer acceptance of early harvested ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 22:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crisosto C, Mitcham E, Kader A (2000) Kiwifruit: Recommendations for maintaining postharvest. Retrieved from: accessed on 13.9.2010
  7. Huang H, Ferguson A (2001) Kiwifruit in China. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci 29:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kader A (1999) Fruit maturity, ripening, and quality relationships. Acta Hort 485:203–208Google Scholar
  9. Kim H, Hewett E, Lallu N (2001) Softening and ethylene production of kiwifruit reduced with 1-methylcyclopropene. Acta Hort 553:167–170Google Scholar
  10. Koukounaras A, Sfakiotakis E (2007) Effect of 1-MCP prestorage treatment on ethylene and CO2 production and quality of ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit during shelf-life after short, medium and long term cold storage. Postharvest Biol Technol 46:174–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MacRae E, Stec M, Triggs C (1990) Effects of postharvest treatment on the sensory qualities of kiwifruit harvested at different maturities. J Sci Food Agric 50:533–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marsh K, Attanayake S, Walker S, Gunson A, Boldingh H, MacRae E (2004) Acidity and taste in kiwifruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 32:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Matsumoto S, Obara T, Luh B (1983) Changes in chemical constituents of Kiwifruit during postharvest ripening. J Food Sci 48:607–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McMath K, Paterson V, Young H, Ball R (1991) Factors affecting the sensory perception of sweetness and acidity in kiwifruit. Acta Hort 297:489–500Google Scholar
  15. Neves LC, Corrent A, Marini L, Lucchetta L, Zanuzzo MR, Gon alves ED, Zanatta J, Cantillano FR, Rombaldi CV (2003) Modified atmosphere and 1-methylciclopropene on postharvest conservation of kiwis cv. Bruno. Rev Bras Frutic 25:390–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Paterson V, MacRae E, Young H (1991) Relationships between sensory properties and chemical composition of kiwifruit(Actinidia deliciosa). J Sci Food Agric 57:235–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stec MGH, Hodgson JA, Macrae EA, Triggs CM (1989) Role of fruit firmness in the sensory evaluation of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa cv Hayward). J Sci Food Agric 47:417–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lei Deng
    • 1
  • Cai-Zhong Jiang
    • 3
  • Wenliang Mu
    • 2
  • Qingguo Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Food Science and EngineeringShandong Agricultural UniversityTaianPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Shandong Provincial Research Centre for Engineering and Technology of Food Safety of Fruits and VegetablesJinanChina
  3. 3.Crops Pathology and Genetics ResearchUSDADavisUSA

Personalised recommendations