Advertisement

Journal of Food Science and Technology

, Volume 51, Issue 12, pp 3830–3837 | Cite as

Functional properties of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) seed and its application as bakery product

  • Kar-Lin Nyam
  • Sod-Ying Leao
  • Chin-Ping Tan
  • Kamariah Long
Original Article

Abstract

Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) seed is a valuable food resource as it has an excellent source of dietary fibre. Therefore, this study examined the functional properties of roselle seeds. Replacement of cookie flour with roselle seed powder at levels of 0–30 % was investigated for its effect on functional and nutritional properties of cookies. Among the four formulations cookies, the most preferred by panelists was 20 % roselle seed powder cookie (F3), followed by 10 % roselle seed powder cookie (F2) and 30 % roselle seed powder cookie (F4). The least preferred formulation among all was control cookie (F1). Cookie with 20 % roselle seed powder added showed higher content of total dietary fibre (5.6 g/100 g) as compared with control cookie (0.90 g/100 g). Besides that, cookies incorporated with roselle seed powder exhibited improved antioxidant properties. Thus, roselle seed powder can be used as a dietary fibre source and developed as a functional ingredient in food products.

Keywords

Roselle seed Functional properties Antioxidant activity Cookies Dietary fibre 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI) for providing the roselle seeds for this study.

References

  1. Ajila CM, Leelavathi K, Prasada Rao UJS (2008) Improvement of dietary fibre content and antioxidant properties in soft dough biscuits with the incorporation of mango peel powder. J Cereal Sci 48:319–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amin I, Emmy Hainida KI, Halimatul Saadiah MN (2008) Roselle seeds- nutritional composition, protein quality and health benefits. Food 2(1):1–16Google Scholar
  3. AOAC (2000) Methods of analysis of Association of Official Analytical Chemistry, methods 985.29 18th edn. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. AOCS (1997) Official methods and recommended practices of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. American Oil Chemists’ Society, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  5. Barampama Z, Simard RE (1993) Nutrient composition, protein quality and anti-nutritional factors of some varieties of dry beans (P. vulgaris) grown in Burundi. Food Chem 47:159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Betancur-Ancoma D, Peraza-Mercado G, Mouguel-Ordonez Y, Fuertes-Blanco S (2004) Physicochemical characterisation of lime bean (Phaseolus lunatus) and Jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis) fibrous residues. Food Chem 84:287–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borderias AJ, Alonso SI, Perez-Mateos M (2005) New applications of fibres in foods: addition to fishery products. Trends Food Sci Technol 16(10):458–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elleuch M, Besbes S, Roiseux O, Blecker C, Deroanne C, Nour-Eddine D, Attia H (2008) Date flash: chemical composition and characteristics of dietary fibre. Food Chem 111:676–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellis RH, Roberts EH (1991) Seed moisture content, storage, viability and vigour. Seed Sci Res 1:275–279Google Scholar
  10. Garau MC, Simal S, Rossello C, Femenia A (2007) Effect of air drying temperature on physico-chemical properties of dietary fibre and antioxidant capacity of orange (Citrus aurantium v. Cabobeta) by-products. Food Chem 104:1014–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hainida E, Amin I, Normah H, Mohd-Esa N, Ainul ZAB (2008) Effects of defatted dried roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) seed powder on lipid profiles of hypercholesterolemia rats. J Sci Food Agric 88:1043–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Halimatul SMN, Amin I, Mohd-Esa N, Nawalyah AG, Siti Muskinah M (2007) Protein quality of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) seeds. Asean Food J 14:131–140Google Scholar
  13. Handa C, Goomer S, Siddhu A (2012) Physicochemical properties and sensory evaluation of fructoligosaccharide enriched cookies. J Food Sci Technol 49(2):192–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hussain S, Anjum FM, Butt MS, Khan MI, Asghar A (2006) Physical and sensoric attributes of flaxseed flour supplemented cookies. Turk J Biol 30:87–92Google Scholar
  15. Izquierdo NG, Nolasco S, Mateo C, Santos D, Aguirrezábal LAN (2012) Relationship between oil tocopherol concentration and oil weight per grain in several crop species. Crop Pasture Sci 62:1088–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Khattak KF, Simpson TJ, Ihasnullah (2008) Effect of gamma irradiation on the extraction yield, total phenoic content and free radical-scavenging activity of Nigella sativa seed. Food Chem 110:967–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koehler HH, Iung-Hsia Chang CH, Scheier G, Burke DW (1987) Nutrition composition, protein quality and sensory properties of thirty-six cultivars of dry beans (P. vulgaris). J Food Sci 52:1335–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu Q, Yao H (2007) Antioxidant activities of barley seed extracts. Food Chem 102:732–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lo GS (1989) Nutritional and physical properties of dietary fibre from soybean. Cereal Foods World 34:530–533Google Scholar
  20. Lopez G, Ros G, Rincon F, Periago M, Martinez M, Ortuno J (1997) Propiedades functionales de la fibra dietetic. Mecanismo de accion en el tracto gastrointestinal. Arch Latinoam Nutr 47(3):203–207Google Scholar
  21. Martin K (1999) Replacing fat, retaining taste. Food Eng Int 24:57–59Google Scholar
  22. Mohammed R, Fernandez J, Pineda M, Aguilar M (2007) Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) seed oil is a rich source of gamma-tocopherol. J Food Sci 72:S207–S211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mohd-Esa N, Shin Hern F, Ismail A, Lye Yee C (2010) Antioxidant activity in different parts of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) extracts and potential exploitation of the seeds. Food Chem 122:1055–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morton JF (1987) Roselle. In: Fruits of warm climates. Florida Flair Books, Miami, pp 281–286Google Scholar
  25. Nyam KL, Tan CP, Lai OM, Long K, Che Man YB (2009) Physicochemical properties and bioactive compounds. LWT J Food Sci Technol 42:1396–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Omabuwajo TO, Sanni LA, Balami YA (2000) Physical properties of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) seeds. J Food Eng 45:37–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosamond WD (2002) Dietary fibre and prevention of cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:57–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rosell CM, Santos E, Collar C (2009) Physico-chemical properties of commercial fibres from different sources: a comparative approach. Food Res Int 42:176–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tosh SM, Yada S (2010) Dietary fibres in pulse seeds and fractions: characterization, functional attributes and applications. Food Res Int 43:450–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vazquez-Ovando A, Rosado-Rubio G, Chel-Geurrero L, Betancur-Ancona D (2009) Physicochemical properties of a fibrous fraction from chia (Saliva hispanica L.). J Food Sci Technol 42:168–173Google Scholar
  31. Waterhouse AL (2002) Determination of total phenolics. In: Current protocols in food analytical chemistry. University of California, Davis, USA, I 1.1.1-1- I 1.1.8Google Scholar
  32. Yamazaki E, Murakami K, Kurita O (2005) Easy preparation of dietary fibre with the high water-holding capacity from food sources. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 1:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kar-Lin Nyam
    • 1
  • Sod-Ying Leao
    • 1
  • Chin-Ping Tan
    • 2
  • Kamariah Long
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Applied SciencesUCSI UniversityKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Food Technology, Faculty of Food Science and TechnologyUniversiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia
  3. 3.Malaysian Agricultural Research & Development Institute (MARDI)Kuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations