Journal of Food Science and Technology

, Volume 51, Issue 5, pp 936–942 | Cite as

Effects of xanthan, guar, carrageenan and locust bean gum addition on physical, chemical and sensory properties of meatballs

  • Zeynep Ozben Demirci
  • Ismail Yılmaz
  • Ahmet Şukru Demirci
Original Article

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of xanthan gum, guar gum, carrageenan and locust bean gum on physical, chemical and sensory properties of meatballs. Meatball samples were produced with three different formulations including of 0.5, 1, and 1.5% each gum addition and gum added samples were compared with the control meatballs. Physical and chemical analyses were carried out on raw and cooked samples separately. Moisture contents of raw samples decreased by addition of gums. There were significant decreases (p < 0.05) in moisture and fat contents of raw and cooked meatball samples formulated with gum when compared with control. Ash contents and texture values increased with gum addition to meatballs. Meatball redness decreased with more gum addition in raw and cooked meatball samples, which means that addition of gums resulted in a lighter-coloured product. According to sensory analysis results, locust bean gum added (1%) samples were much preferred by the panelists.

Keywords

Meatball Xanthan Guar Carrageenan Locust bean Quality characteristics 

References

  1. AMSA (1978) Guidelines for cookery and sensory evaluation of meat. American Meat Science Association, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson ET, Berry BW (2001) Effects on inner pea fiber on fat retention and cooking yield in high fat ground beef. Food Res Int 34:689–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrés SC, García ME, Zaritzky NE, Califano AN (2006) Storage stability of low-fat chicken sausages. J Food Eng 72:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. AOAC (1990) Official methods for the analysis, 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  5. Arıcı M, Gümüş T, Demirci AŞ (2007) Ksantan Gam: Özellikleri ve Mikrobiyolojik Yolla Üretimi. Gıda Mühendisliği 5. Kongresi (In Turkish)Google Scholar
  6. Bloukas JG, Paneras ED, Papadima S (1997) Effect of carrageenan on processing and quality characteristics of low-fat frankfurters. J Muscle Foods 8:63–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradford DD, Huffman DL, Egbert WR, Mikel WB (1993) Potassium lactate effects on low-fat fresh pork sausage chubs during simulated retail distribution. J Food Sci 58:1245–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Candoğan K, Kolsarici N (2003a) The effects of carrageenan and pectin on some quality characteristics of low-fat beef frankfurters. Meat Sci 64:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Candoğan K, Kolsarici N (2003b) Storage stability of low-fat beef frankfurters formulated with carrageenan or carrageenan with pectin. Meat Sci 64:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cengiz E, Gokoglu N (2005) Changes in energy and cholesterol contents of frankfurter-type sausages with fat reduction and fat replacer addition. Food Chem 91:443–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Choi YS, Jeong JY, Choi JH, Han DJ, Kim HY, Lee MA, Shim SY, Paik HD, Kim CJ (2007) Quality characteristics of meat batters containing dietary fiber extracted from rice bran. Korean J Food Sci An 27:228–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cofrades S, Hughes E, Troy DJ (2000) Effects of oat fiber and carrageenan of the texture of frankfurters formulated with low and high fat. Eur Food Res Technol 211:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crehan CM, Hughes E, Troy DJ, Buckley DJ (2000) Effects of fat level and maltodextrin on the functional properties of frankfurters formulated with 5%, 12% and 30% fat. Meat Sci 55:463–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dea ICM (1979) Interactions of ordered polysaccharide structures. Synergism and freeze–thaw phenomena. In: Blanshard JMV, Mitchell JR (eds) Polysaccharides in food. Butterworths, London, pp 229–248Google Scholar
  15. Egbert WR, Huffman DL, Bradford DD, Jones WR (1992a) Properties of low-fat ground beef containing potassium lactate during aerobic refrigerated storage. J Food Sci 57:1033–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Egbert WR, Huffman DL, Chen CM, Jones WR (1992b) Microbial and oxidative changes in low-fat ground beef during simulated retail distribution. J Food Sci 57:1269–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foegeding EA, Ramsey SR (1986) Effect of gums on low-fat meat batters. J Food Sci 51:33–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fox JB Jr, Ackerman SA, Jenkins RK (1983) Effect of anionic gums on the texture of pickled frankfurters. J Food Sci 48:1031–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garcia ML, Dominguez R, Galvez MD, Casas C, Selgas MD (2002) Utilization of cereal and fruit fibers in low fat dry fermented sausages. Meat Sci 60:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hsu SY, Chung HY (1999) Comparisons of 13 edible gumhydrate fat substitute for low-fat Kung-wan (an emulsifed meatball). J Food Eng 40:279–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hsu SY, Chung HY (2000) Interactions of konjac, agar, curdlan gum, κ-carrageenan and reheating treatment in emulsified meatballs. J Food Eng 44:199–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hsu SY, Chung HY (2001) Effects of j-carrageenan, salt, phosphates and fat on qualities of low emulsified meatballs. J Food Eng 47:115–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hsu SY, Yu SH (1999) Effects of phosphate and water on qualities of low fat emulsified meatball. J Food Eng 39:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hughes E, Cofrades S, Troy DJ (1997) Effects of fat level, oat fibre and carrageenan on frankfurters formulated with 5, 12 and 30% fat. Meat Sci 45:273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hughes E, Mullen AM, Troy DJ (1998) Effect of fat level, tapioca starch and whey protein on frankfurter formulated with 5% and 12% fat. Meat Sci 48:169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. IFT (1985) Guidelines for the preparation and review of papers reporting sensory evaluation data. J Food Sci 60:210Google Scholar
  27. Imeson AP (2000) Carrageenan. In: Phillips GO, Williams PA (eds) Handbook of hydrocolloids. Woodhead Publishing Limited, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 87–102Google Scholar
  28. Jimenez-Colmenero F, Serrano A, Ayo J, Solas MT, Cofrades S, Carballo J (2003) Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of restructured beef steak with added walnuts. Meat Sci 65:1391–1397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lin KW, Huang HY (2003) Konjac/gellan gum mixed gels improve the quality of reduced fat frankfurters. Meat Sci 65:749–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Luruena-Martinez MA, Vivar-Quintana RI (2004) Effect of locust bean/ xanthan gum addition and replacement of pork fat with olive oil on the quality characteristics of low fat frankfurters. Meat Sci 68:383–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mittal GS, Barbut S (1993) Effects of various cellulose gums on the quality parameters. Meat Sci 35:93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Modi VK, Yashoda KP, Mahendrakar NS (2009) Low-fat mutton kofta prepared by using carrageenan as fat replacer: quality changes in cooked product during storage. J Food Sci Technol 46:316–319Google Scholar
  33. Pedersen K (1979) The selection of hydrocolloids to meet functional requirements. In: Blanshard JMV, Mitchell JR (eds) Polysaccharides in food. Butterworths, London, pp 219–228Google Scholar
  34. Roth DM, McKeith FK, Brewer MS (1997) Processing parameter effects on textural characteristics of reduced-fat pork sausage. J Food Quality 20:567–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Simeone M, Alfani A, Guido S (2004) Phase diagram, rheology and interfacial tension of aqueous mixtures of Na-caseinate and Na-alginate. Food Hydrocolloids 18:463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Soysal I (1992) Principles of biometric analysis, T. Uni. Tekirdag Zir. Fak. Yay. No: 95, Tekirdag (In Turkish)Google Scholar
  37. Symes KC (1980) The relationship between the covalent structure of the “Xanthomonas” polysaccharide (Xanthan) and its function as a thickening, suspending and gelling agent. Food Chem 6:63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Talukder S, Sharma DP (2010) Development of dietary fiber rich chicken meat patties using wheat and oat bran. J Food Sci Technol 47:224–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. TSE (1992) Pismemis Kofte Standardi (Turkish Uncooked Meatball Standard, TS 10581) Turk Standartlari Enstitusu, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  40. Turhan S, Sagir I, Ustun NS (2005) Utilization of hazelnut pellicle in low-fat beef burgers. Meat Sci 71:312–316Google Scholar
  41. Ulu H (2006) Effects of carrageenan and guar gum on the cooking and textural properties of low fat meatballs. Food Chem 95:600–605Google Scholar
  42. van de Velde F (2008) Structure and function of hybrid carrageenans. Food Hydrocolloid 22:727–734Google Scholar
  43. Verma AK, Banerjee R (2010) Dietary fibre as functional ingredient in meat products: a novel approach for healthy living—a review. J Food Sci Technol 47:247–257Google Scholar
  44. Vijayendran BR, Bone T (1984) Absolute molecular weight and molecular weight distribution of guar by size exclusion chromatography. Carbohyd Polym 4:299–313Google Scholar
  45. Whistler RL, BeMiller JN (1997) Carbohydrate chemistry for food scientists. AACC, St PaulGoogle Scholar
  46. Yang HS, Choi SG, Jeon JT, Park GB, Joo ST (2007) Textural and sensory properties of low fat pork sausages with added hydrated oatmeal and tofu as texture-modifying agents. Meat Sci 75:283–289Google Scholar
  47. Yaşarlar EE, Dağlıoğlu O, Yılmaz I (2007) Effects of cereal bran addition on chemical composition, cooking characteristics and sensory properties of Turkish meatballs. Asian J Chem 19:2353–2361Google Scholar
  48. Yılmaz I (2004a) Effects of rye bran addition on fatty acid composition and quality characteristics of low-fat meatballs. Meat Sci 67:245–249Google Scholar
  49. Yılmaz I (2004b) Quality characteristics and fatty acid composition of Turkish type frankfurter made with sunflower oil addition. Fleiswirthschaft international 1:52–54Google Scholar
  50. Yılmaz I, Dağlıoğlu O (2003) The effect of replacing fat with oat bran on fatty acid composition and physicochemical properties of meatballs. Meat Sci 65:819–823Google Scholar
  51. Yılmaz I (2005) Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of low fat meatballs with added wheat bran. J Food Eng 69:369–373Google Scholar
  52. Yılmaz I, Gecgel U (2009) Effect of inulin addition on physic-chemical and sensory characteristics of meatballs. J Food Sci Technol 46:473–476Google Scholar
  53. Yoo SS, Kook SH, Park SY, Shim JH, Chin KB (2007) Physicochemical characteristics, textural properties and volatile compounds in comminuted sausages as affected by various fat levels and fat replacers. Int J Food Sci Tech 42:1114–1122Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zeynep Ozben Demirci
    • 1
  • Ismail Yılmaz
    • 1
  • Ahmet Şukru Demirci
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of AgricultureNamık Kemal UniversityTekirdagTurkey

Personalised recommendations