Advertisement

Journal of Food Science and Technology

, Volume 51, Issue 4, pp 722–728 | Cite as

Effects of cooking methods and temperatures on nutritional and quality characteristics of anchovy (Engraulis encrasicholus)

  • Harun Uran
  • Nalan GokogluEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the nutritional and quality characteristics of anchovy after cooking. The fish were cooked by different methods (frying, baking and grilling) at two different temperatures (160 °C, 180 °C). Crude ash, crude protein and crude fat contents of cooked fish increased due to rise in dry matter contents. While cooking methods affected mineral content of anchovy, cooking temperature did not affect. The highest values of monounsaturated fatty acids were found in baked samples. Polyunsaturated fatty acids in baked samples were also high and similar in fried samples. Fried samples, which were the most preferred, lost its nutritional characteristics more than baked and grilled samples. Grilled and baked fish samples can be recommended for healthy consumption. However, grilled fish samples had hard texture due to more moisture loss than other methods. Therefore, it is concluded that baking is the best cooking method for anchovy.

Keywords

Anchovy Cooking Quality Nutrients 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Scientific Research Projects Administration Unit of Akdeniz University under project no. 2005.02.0121.007 supported this research.

References

  1. Ackurt F (1991) Geleneksel yöntemlerle hazırlanan ve pişirilen et ve balıkta besin öğeleri korunum düzeylerinin saptanması. Gıda sanayi 5(1):58–66 (In Turkish)Google Scholar
  2. Al-Saghir S, Thurner K, Wagner KH, Frisch G, Luf W, Razazi-Fazeli Z, Elmadfa I (2004) Effects of different cooking procedures on lipid quality and cholesterol oxidation of farmed salmon fish (Salmo salar). J Agric Food Chem 52:5290–5296Google Scholar
  3. American Oil Chemists’ Society (1990) Official methods and recommended practices of the American Oil Chemist’s Society. American Oil Chemists’ Society, IL, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Amerina MA, Pangborn RV, Roessler EB (1965) Principles of sensory evaluation of food. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Anonymous (2000) The fishery sector in Turkey. Eurofish Magazine 3:42–45Google Scholar
  6. Anonymous (2003) Current status of fisheries and aquaculture in Turkey. Eurofish Magazine 1:18–31Google Scholar
  7. Anonymous (2009) Fishery statistics. State Institute of Statistics Prime Ministry Republic of TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  8. AOAC (1990) Official methods of analyses of association of analytical chemist. Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ (1959) A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purifcation. Can J Biochem Physiol 37:911–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferioli F, Caboni MF, Dutta PC (2008) Evaluation of cholesterol and lipid oxidation in raw and cooked minced beef stored under oxygen-enriched atmosphere. Meat Sci 80(3):681–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flick GJ, Gwo YY, Ory RL, Baran WL, Sasiela RJ, Boling J, Vinnett CH, Martin RE (1989) Effects of cooking conditions and postpreparation procedures on the quality of battered fish portions. J Food Qual 12(3):227–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gall KL, Otwell WS, Koburger JA, Appledorf H (1983) Effects of four cooking methods on proximate, mineral and fatty acid composition of fish fillets. J Food Sci 48:1068–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gokoglu N, Yerlikaya P, Cengiz E (2004) Effects of cooking methods on the proximate composition and mineral contents of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Food Chem 84:19–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1985) Statistical procedures for agricultural research. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Illow BR, Illow R (2002) Comparison of the effects of microwave cooking and conventional cooking methods on the composition of fatty acids and fat quality indicators in herring. Nahrung /Food 46(6):383–388Google Scholar
  16. Kacar B (1972) Bitki ve Topragın Kimyasal Analizleri. II Bitki Analizleri. Ankara Universitesi Ziraat Fakultesi Yayinlari, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  17. Kacar B, Kovanci I (1982) Bitki Toprak ve Gubrelerde Kimyasal Fosfor Analizleri ve Sonucların Degerlendirilmesi. Ege Universitesi Ziraat Fakultesi Yayinlari, Izmir/TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  18. Manthey M, Karnop G, Rehbein H (1988) Quality changes of European catfish (Silurus glanis) from warm water aquaculture during storage in ice. Int J Food Sci Technol 23:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marimuthu K, Thilaga M, Kathiresan S, Xavier R, Mas RHMH (2011) Effect of different cooking methods on proximate and mineral composition of striped snakehead fish (Channa striatus, Bloch). J Food Sci Technol. doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0418-9
  20. Morrıson WR, Smith LM (1964) Preparation of fatty acid methyls esters and dimethylacetals from lippids with boron-flouride-methanol. J Lipid Res 5:600–608Google Scholar
  21. Ohgaki S, Kannei M, Morita S (1994) Quantitative and qualitative changes in sardine lipid by cooking. Annu Rep Osaka City Inst Publ Health Environ Sci 56:24–31Google Scholar
  22. Rodrıgez-Estrada MT, Penazzi G, Caboni MF, Bertacco G, Lercker G (1997) Effect of different cooking methods on some lipid and protein components of hamburgers. Meat sci 45(3):365–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Salawu SO, Adu OC, Akindahunsı AA (2005) Nutritive value of fresh and brackish water catfish as afunction of size and processing methods. Eur Food Res Technol 220:531–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sanchez-Muniz FJ, Viejo JM, Medina R (1992) Deep-frying of sardines in different culinary fats. Changes in the fatty acids composition of sardines and frying fats. J Agric Food Chem 40:2252–2256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Steiner-Asiedu M, Julsham K, Lie Q (1991) Effect of local processing methods (cooking, frying and smoking) on three fish species from Ghana. Food Chem 40:309–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Professional Education İstanbulIstanbul Aydin UniverstiyİstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Fish processing DepartmentAkdeniz University Fisheries FacultyAntalyaTurkey

Personalised recommendations