Journal of Food Science and Technology

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 158–162

Processing, physico-chemical, sensory and nutritional evaluation of protein, mineral and vitamin enriched peanut chikki - an Indian traditional sweet

  • Byrappa Vasu Pallavi
  • Ramakrishna Chetana
  • Sunkireddy Yella Reddy
Original Article

Abstract

Chikki, a popular Indian traditional sweet snack prepared from peanut was enriched with protein, minerals and vitamins by incorporating soy protein isolate, calcium carbonate, ferrous fumerate, vitamin A and folic acid to meet the growing demand for health foods. The enriched nutra chikki was evaluated for physico-chemical characteristics such as moisture, texture, peroxide value (PV), fatty acid composition in comparison with control peanut chikki. Nutra chikki, which had initial moisture content of 2–3%, did not alter much up to 60 days of storage at 27 °C and 37 °C. PV increased gradually at 27 °C, whereas at 37 °C, it was higher. Hardness of nutra chikki did not change significantly when stored at 27 °C up to 105 days, but at 37 °C a gradual increase in hardness was observed after 45 days. These results of nutra chikki were similar and comparable with those of control chikki. Nutra chikki had 18% protein, 20% fat, 6.42% Ca, 1.7% Fe, 4000 μg vitamin A and 2660 μg folic acid. Protein digestibility corrected amino acid score of nutra chikki was 0.78 whereas that of control chikki was 0.73. The fatty acid composition of control and nutra chikki was same as both contain peanuts as oil source. The formulation and process parameters for preparation of protein, mineral and vitamin enriched peanut chikki, were standardized. The storage stability and quality parameters of enriched chikki were comparable with those of control chikki.

Keywords

Peanut chikki Fortified chikki Protein enriched chikki Processing Sensory evaluation 

References

  1. Ahmad FM, Ashraf AS, Ahmad AF, Ansari AJ, Siddiquee MR (2011) Nutraceutical market and its regulation. Am J Food Technol 6(5):342–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AOAC (2000) Official methods of analysis. 17th edn, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Method 968.22 and 985.35. Maryland, p 9-11, p 15-17.Google Scholar
  3. AOCS (1997a) Official method of analysis and recommended practices, 5th edn, Ba 6-84, Cd 8-53 and Ce 2-66, American Oil Chemists Society, Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
  4. AOCS (1997b) Official method of analysis and recommended practices, 4th edn, Ca 2a-45, American Oil Chemists Society, Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
  5. AOCS (2001) Official method of analysis and recommended practices, 4th edn, Ba 3-38, Rev. and Reapproved, 6th edn, American Oil Chemists Society, Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
  6. AOCS (1990) Official method of analysis and recommended practices, 4th edn, Ba 4b-87. American Oil Chemists Society, Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
  7. Chahal S, Sehgal S (1996) Development, acceptability and nutritional evaluation of homemade supplements for school children. Nahrung 40:345–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chase WG YEL Jr, Stoakes VC, Eitenmiller RR, Long AR (2004) An inter laboratory-verified method for the determination of vitamins A and E in milk and soy based infant formula by liquid chromatography with matrix solid-phase dispersion extraction. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 87:1173–1178Google Scholar
  9. Cimino TF, Zalatti V, Venuti V, Sulfaro V, Pasquale DA, Saija A (2005) Influence of heating on antioxidant activity and the chemical composition of some spice essential oils. Food Chem 89:549–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clandinin DR (1978) Processed protein foodstuffs, Altschul A M. (ed), Academic Press Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  11. Devappa RK, Bhagya S (2008) Biochemical and nutritional evaluation of Jatropha protein isolate prepared by steam injection heating for reduction of toxic and antinutritional factors. J Sci Food Agric 88:911–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gupta RK, Sharma A, Sharma R (2007) Textural profile analysis of sunflower-sesame kernel confection (chikki). J Texture Studies 38:153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacoby BT, Franklin HT (1992) Liquid chromatographic determination of folic acid in infant formula and adult medical nutritionals. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 75:891–898Google Scholar
  14. Khalil JK, Chughtai MID (1983) Chemical composition and nutritional quality of five peanut cultivars grown in Pakistan. Plant Foods for Human Nutr 33:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Manay NS, Shadaksharswamy M (1995) Foods, facts and principles. New Age Int. Publ. Ltd., New Delhi. p 420-424.Google Scholar
  16. Palthur PM, Palthur SSS, Chitta KS (2009) Emerging products in India: a regulatory view. Food and Drug Law J 64(4):677–692Google Scholar
  17. Prasad NN, Khanum F, Siddalingaswamy M, Santhanam K (1995) Proximate composition and dietary fibre content of varius foods/rations processed to suit the Indian palate. Food Chem 52:373–378Google Scholar
  18. Sarwar G, McDonough FE (1990) Review of protein quality evaluation methods: evaluation of protein digestibility corrected amino acid score method for assessing protein quality of foods. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 73:347–355Google Scholar
  19. Stone H, Sidel IJ, Joel OS, Woolsey A, Sryleton RC (1974) Sensory evaluation by quantitative descriptive analysis. J Food Technol 28:24–34Google Scholar
  20. Vidyasagar K, Aswathnarayana TM, Gosh KG, Ramanujam S, Kameswara Rao G (1964) Studies on storage of packed rations. 1. Groundnut candy bar. J Food Sci Technol 1:68–71Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Byrappa Vasu Pallavi
    • 1
  • Ramakrishna Chetana
    • 1
  • Sunkireddy Yella Reddy
    • 1
  1. 1.Lipid Science & Traditional Foods DepartmentCentral Food Technological Research Institute (Council of Scientific and Industrial Research)MysoreIndia

Personalised recommendations