Journal of Food Science and Technology

, Volume 50, Issue 5, pp 909–917 | Cite as

Relationship of sensory and instrumental aroma measurements of dark chocolate as influenced by fermentation method, roasting and conching conditions

  • Margaret Owusu
  • Mikael Agerlin Petersen
  • Hanne Heimdal
Original Article

Abstract

The investigation was undertaken to establish a relationship between key odorants and perceived flavor attributes of dark chocolate as influenced by cocoa fermentation method, roasting and conching conditions, using multivariate data analysis in an attempt to use one variable to predict the other. Eight of the sixteen flavor attributes used by a trained sensory panel to describe and quantify the intensity of attributes in the samples were significantly different (p < 0.05). Roasting significantly reduced astringency in heap-fermented samples but the reduction in tray-fermented samples was not significant. Unconched samples were rated higher in banana attribute than conched samples. Multivariate data analytical tools, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Partial Least Squares (PLS) were used to investigate quantitative descriptive analysis and GC-O data and also to relate the two sets of data. PLS 1 models based on single sensory attributes gave better models than PLS2 models based on all sixteen sensory attributes. Ethyl-3-methylbutanoate (fruity, flowery); 2,5-dimethylpyrazine (popcorn); dihydro-2(3H)-furanone, (sweet); linalool oxide (sweet, flowery); benzaldehyde (earthy, nutty) and 2/3-methylbutanal (cocoa, roasted) modeled fruit attribute. It was also possible to model the attribute astringent from the aroma compounds 5-methyl-2-phenyl-2-hexenal (sweet, roasted cocoa), ethyl-3-methylbutanoate and pentyl acetate (green, cucumber). Since fruit attribute was higher in unconched samples and astringent higher in unroasted samples, it may be possible to use the levels of these important aroma compounds as indicators of the sensory attributes fruit and astringent.

Keywords

Heap-fermented Tray-fermented Roasting Conching Chocolate Flavor attributes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their gratitude to the Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA) and Toms Confectionery Group A/S for financial assistance. We also wish to thank Mehdi D. Farahani and Francisca Lystov-Saabye for their technical assistance.

References

  1. Andrae-Nightingale LM, Lee S-Y, Engeseth NJ (2009) Textural changes in chocolate characterized by instrumental and sensory techniques. J Texture Studies 40:427–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison HWS, Kenten RH (1963) Tray Fermentation of Cocoa. Tropical Agriculture (StAugustine) 40:15–24Google Scholar
  3. Berna AZ, Buysens S, Di Natale C, Grün IU, Lammertyne J, Nicolaï BM (2005) Relating sensory analysis with electronic nose and headspace fingerprint MS for tomato aroma profiling. Post Harvest Biol and Technol 36:143–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonvehí JS, Coll FV (1997) Evaluation of bitterness and astringency of polyphenolic compounds in cocoa powder. Food Chem 60:365–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clifford MN (1985) Phenol–protein interaction and their possible significance for astringency. In: Birch GC, Lindley MG (eds) Interaction of food components. Elsevier, London, pp 143–164Google Scholar
  6. Counet C, Callemien D, Ouwerx C, Collin S (2002) Use of Gas Chromatography-Olfactometry to identify key odorant compounds in dark chocolate. Comparison of samples before and after conching. J Agric Food Chem 5:2385–2391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dimick PS, Hoskin JC (1999) The chemistry of flavour development in chocolate. In: Beckett ST (ed) Industrial chocolate manufacture and use, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 137–152Google Scholar
  8. Drake MA, Gerard VD (1999) Relationship between instrumental and sensory measurements of cheese texture. J Texture Studies 30:451–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drake MA, Miracle RE, Caudle AD, Cadwallader KR (2007) Relating sensory and instrumental analysis. In: Marsili R (ed) Sensory-directed flavor analysis. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, FlGoogle Scholar
  10. Gambaro A, Varela P, Gimenez A (2002) Textural quality of white pan bread by sensory and instrumental measurements. J Texture Studies 33:401–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heinzler M, Eichner K (1991) The role of amodori compounds during cocoa processing – formation of aroma compounds under roasting conditions. Z Lebensm-Unters-Forsch 21:445–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kattenberg HR, Kemmink A (1993) The flavor of cocoa in relation to the origin and processing of the cocoa beans. In: Charalambous G (ed) Food flavor, ingredients and composition. Elsevier, New York, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  13. Krysiak W (2006) Influence of roasting conditions on coloration of roasted cocoa beans. J Food Eng 77:449–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee S-Y, Luna-Guzman I, Chang S, Barret DM, Guinard J-X (1999) Relating descriptive analysis and instrumental texture data of processed diced tomatoes. Food Qual Prefer 10:447–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lopez AS (1986) Chemical changes occurring during the processing of cacao. In: Dimick PS (ed) Proceeding of the cacao biotechnology symposium. Penn State University, USA, p 19–53Google Scholar
  16. Martinez CS, Ribotta PD, Leon AE, Anon MC (2007) Physical, sensory and chemical evaluation of cooked spaghetti. J Texture Studies 38:666–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Misnawi JS, Jamilah B, Nazamid S (2003) Effects of incubation and polyphenol oxidase enrichment on colour, fermentation index, procyanidins and astringency of unfermented and partly fermented cocoa beans. Int J Food Sci Technol 38:385–395Google Scholar
  18. Misnawi JS, Jamilah B, Nazamid S (2004) Sensory properties of cocoa liquor as affected by polyphenol concentration and duration of roasting. Food Qual Prefer 15:203–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Misnawi JS, Jamilah B, Nazamid S (2005) Changes in polyphenol ability to produce astringency during roasting of cocoa liquor. J Sci Food Agric 85:917–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nobel AC, Ebeler SE (2002) Use of multivariate statistics in understanding wine flavor. Food Reviews Int 18:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Owusu M, Petersen MA, Heimdal H (2008) Assessment of aroma of chocolate produced from two cocoa fermentation types. In: Expression of Multidisciplinary Flavour Science Proceedings of the 12th Wuerman Symposium. Interlarken, Switzerland, p 363–366.Google Scholar
  22. Petersen, RG (1985) Completely randomized design. In design and Analysis of Exxperiments, Marcel Dekker, NY, pp 7–33Google Scholar
  23. Porter LJ, Ma Z, Chan G (1991) Cacao procyanidins: major flavonoids and identification of some minor metabolites. Phytochem 5:1657–1663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ramli N, Hassan O, Said M, Samsudin W, Idris NA (2006) Influence of roasting conditions on volatile flavor of roasted Malaysian cocoa beans. J Food Process Preserv 30:280–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sabanis D, Soukoulis C, Tzia C (2009) Effect of raisin juice addition on bread produced from different wheat cultivars. Food Sci Technol Int 15:325–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Steinberg FM, Bearden MM, Keen CL (2003) Cocoa and chocolate flavanoids: implications for cardiovascular health. J Am Dietetic Assoc 103:215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wollgast J, Anklam E (2000a) Review of polyphenols in Theobroma cacao: changes in composition during the manufacture of chocolate and methodology for identification and quantification. Food Res Int 33:42–447Google Scholar
  28. Wollgast J, Anklam E (2000b) Polyphenols in chocolate: is there a contribution to human health? Food Res Int 33:449–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ziegleder G (1991) Composition of flavor extracts of raw and roasted cocoas. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 192:521–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margaret Owusu
    • 1
  • Mikael Agerlin Petersen
    • 1
  • Hanne Heimdal
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Food Science/Quality and Technology, Faculty of Life sciencesUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksberg CDenmark
  2. 2.Toms Confectionery GroupBallerupDenmark

Personalised recommendations