Relationship of sensory and instrumental aroma measurements of dark chocolate as influenced by fermentation method, roasting and conching conditions
- 808 Downloads
The investigation was undertaken to establish a relationship between key odorants and perceived flavor attributes of dark chocolate as influenced by cocoa fermentation method, roasting and conching conditions, using multivariate data analysis in an attempt to use one variable to predict the other. Eight of the sixteen flavor attributes used by a trained sensory panel to describe and quantify the intensity of attributes in the samples were significantly different (p < 0.05). Roasting significantly reduced astringency in heap-fermented samples but the reduction in tray-fermented samples was not significant. Unconched samples were rated higher in banana attribute than conched samples. Multivariate data analytical tools, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Partial Least Squares (PLS) were used to investigate quantitative descriptive analysis and GC-O data and also to relate the two sets of data. PLS 1 models based on single sensory attributes gave better models than PLS2 models based on all sixteen sensory attributes. Ethyl-3-methylbutanoate (fruity, flowery); 2,5-dimethylpyrazine (popcorn); dihydro-2(3H)-furanone, (sweet); linalool oxide (sweet, flowery); benzaldehyde (earthy, nutty) and 2/3-methylbutanal (cocoa, roasted) modeled fruit attribute. It was also possible to model the attribute astringent from the aroma compounds 5-methyl-2-phenyl-2-hexenal (sweet, roasted cocoa), ethyl-3-methylbutanoate and pentyl acetate (green, cucumber). Since fruit attribute was higher in unconched samples and astringent higher in unroasted samples, it may be possible to use the levels of these important aroma compounds as indicators of the sensory attributes fruit and astringent.
KeywordsHeap-fermented Tray-fermented Roasting Conching Chocolate Flavor attributes
The authors wish to express their gratitude to the Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA) and Toms Confectionery Group A/S for financial assistance. We also wish to thank Mehdi D. Farahani and Francisca Lystov-Saabye for their technical assistance.
- Allison HWS, Kenten RH (1963) Tray Fermentation of Cocoa. Tropical Agriculture (StAugustine) 40:15–24Google Scholar
- Clifford MN (1985) Phenol–protein interaction and their possible significance for astringency. In: Birch GC, Lindley MG (eds) Interaction of food components. Elsevier, London, pp 143–164Google Scholar
- Dimick PS, Hoskin JC (1999) The chemistry of flavour development in chocolate. In: Beckett ST (ed) Industrial chocolate manufacture and use, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 137–152Google Scholar
- Drake MA, Miracle RE, Caudle AD, Cadwallader KR (2007) Relating sensory and instrumental analysis. In: Marsili R (ed) Sensory-directed flavor analysis. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, FlGoogle Scholar
- Kattenberg HR, Kemmink A (1993) The flavor of cocoa in relation to the origin and processing of the cocoa beans. In: Charalambous G (ed) Food flavor, ingredients and composition. Elsevier, New York, pp 1–22Google Scholar
- Lopez AS (1986) Chemical changes occurring during the processing of cacao. In: Dimick PS (ed) Proceeding of the cacao biotechnology symposium. Penn State University, USA, p 19–53Google Scholar
- Misnawi JS, Jamilah B, Nazamid S (2003) Effects of incubation and polyphenol oxidase enrichment on colour, fermentation index, procyanidins and astringency of unfermented and partly fermented cocoa beans. Int J Food Sci Technol 38:385–395Google Scholar
- Owusu M, Petersen MA, Heimdal H (2008) Assessment of aroma of chocolate produced from two cocoa fermentation types. In: Expression of Multidisciplinary Flavour Science Proceedings of the 12th Wuerman Symposium. Interlarken, Switzerland, p 363–366.Google Scholar
- Petersen, RG (1985) Completely randomized design. In design and Analysis of Exxperiments, Marcel Dekker, NY, pp 7–33Google Scholar
- Wollgast J, Anklam E (2000a) Review of polyphenols in Theobroma cacao: changes in composition during the manufacture of chocolate and methodology for identification and quantification. Food Res Int 33:42–447Google Scholar