Advertisement

Journal of Food Science and Technology

, Volume 50, Issue 5, pp 900–908 | Cite as

Studies on processing, consumer survey and storage stability of a ready-to-reconstitute fish cutlet mix

  • G. Reza ShavikloEmail author
  • Gudjon Thorkelsson
  • Kolbrun Sveinsdottir
  • Fatemeh Pourreza
Original Article

Abstract

A convenience ready-to-reconstitute cutlet mix containing 30% fish protein powder was developed to improve the nutritional quality of the product. Consumer survey was based on the home use test (HUT) method. The acceptance of the fish cutlet mix (FCM) was studied using a 9-point hedonic scale ranging from 1 (extremely dislike) to 9 (extremely like). Product’s characteristics and stability were studied during 6 months of storage at 27 ± 2 °C. The FCM packed in a polyethylene bag and cardboard box was stable during the storage period. There were no changes in colour, moisture gain and water activity, and TBARS values remained low. The FCM was accepted by the consumers in the study (n = 85). The average liking was high (7.5 ± 1.3) and it was influenced by frequency of fish and chicken consumption, educational level and household size. People who ate fish once a week liked the product more than other consumers. Also those with higher educational level and bigger household size. The results in this paper are important information for companies planning to develop ready-to-eat products fortified with fish proteins. The products could be means of increasing fish consumption in countries/areas where there is no tradition of consuming fresh or frozen fish.

Keywords

Ready-to-reconstitute Fish cutlet mix Fish protein powder Consumer acceptance Home use test Storage stability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The support of the United Nations University-Fisheries Training Programme, Matis (Icelandic Food and Biotech R&D), Rannis (Icelandic Centre for Research) and Zardaneh (Soy Protein Company, Esfahan, Iran) to this study is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to thank Adalheidur Olafsdottir at Matis for her advice on the consumer survey and Hoshang Bahrami and R&D group at Zardaneh Co. for their cooperation in the product development.

References

  1. Abeysinghe CP, Illeperuma CK (2006) Formulation of an MSG (Monosodium Glutamate) free Instant vegetable soup mix. J Natn Sci Foundation Sri Lanka 34(2):91–95Google Scholar
  2. Altschul AM (1989) Low-calorie foods. Food Technol 43(4):113–125Google Scholar
  3. Alvarez RJ, Binder JM (1984) Protection of spice quality using clear plastic packaging. Dairy Food Sanitation J 4:464–465Google Scholar
  4. AOAC (1990) Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakar J (2007) Processing formulated fish and fish products. In: Handbook of Food Product Manufacturing, Hui YH (ed) Wiley & Sons, Inc, p 915–930Google Scholar
  6. Ballester D, Barja I, Yanez E, Donoso G (1968) Protein-rich mixtures for human consumption based on fish flour, sunflower press cake meal, dried skim milk and wheat flour. Brit J Nutr 22:255–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belitz HD, Grosch W, Schieberle P (2009) Food Chemistry, 4th edn. Springer-Verlag Press, Berlin, Germany, pp 211–218Google Scholar
  8. Bello RA, Piggot GM (1979) A new approach to utilize minced fish flesh in dried products. J Food Sci 2:355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bello RA, Piggot GM (1980) Dried fish patties: storage stability and economic considerations. J Food Process Pres 4:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carvajal PA, Lanier TC, Macdonald GA (2005) Stabilization of proteins in surimi. In: Park JW (ed) Surimi and Surimi Seafood, 2nd edn. Francis and Taylor Group, London, pp 163–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chavan BR, Basu S, Kovale SR (2008) Development of edible texturised dried fish granules from low-value fish croaker (Otolithus argenteus) and its storage characteristics. CMU J Nat Sci 1:173–182Google Scholar
  12. Chung YC, Ho ML, Chyan FL, Jiang ST (2000) Utilization of freeze-dried mackerel (Scomber australasicus) muscle proteins as a binder in restructured meat. Fisheries Sci 66:130–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Euromonitor (2010) Ready Meals in Iran. Euromonitor International. November 2010, p 50Google Scholar
  14. Fanelli MJ, Peterson AC, Gunderson MF (1965) Microbiology of dehydrated soups. I A survey Food Technol 19(5):83–86Google Scholar
  15. FAO (2009a) Fishery and Aquaculture Country Profiles Iran. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at: http://www.fao.org/fishery/countrysector/FI-CP_IR/en. [Accessed 20 March 2010].
  16. FAO (2009b) National Aquaculture Sector Overview Iran. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at: http://www.fao.org/fishery/countrysector/naso_iran/en. [Accessed 20 March 2010].
  17. Fewtrell L, Prüss-Üstün A, Bos R, Gore F, Bartram J (2007) Water, sanitation and hygiene; quantifying the health impacts at national and local level in countries with incomplete water supply and sanitation coverage. Geneva, World Health Organization. Environmental Burden of Disease Series No. 15. Available at: http://www.who.int/quantifying_ehimpacts/publications/en/, p 12–50. [Accessed 20 March 2010].
  18. Francis FJ (1991) Colour measurements and interpretation. In: Instrumental Methods of Quality Assurance in Foods, Fung D, Matthews RF(eds), Marcel Dekker, New York, p 189–209Google Scholar
  19. Gill T (1995) Biochemical and chemical methods for assessment of fish quality. In: Quality and Quality Changes in Fresh Fish, Huss HH (ed), FAO Fisheries Technical Paper nr. 348. Rome, Italy, p 139–150Google Scholar
  20. Gogoi BK, Oswalt AJ, Choudhury GS (1996) Reverse screw elements and feed composition effects during twin-screw extrusion of rice flour and fish muscle blends. J Food Sci 3:590–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haard NF (1995) Composition and nutritive value of fish proteins and other nitrogen compounds. In: Ruiter A (ed) Fish and Fishery Products: Composition, Nutritive Properties and Stability. Biddles Ltd, Guilford, UK, pp 77–115Google Scholar
  22. Huda N, Abdullah A, Babji AS (2000) Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of crackers formulated with surimi powder. In: International Seminar on the Role of Chemistry in Industry and Environment, pp 1–5 Padand, West Sumatra, Indonesia, 30–31 AugGoogle Scholar
  23. Huda N, Abdullah A, Babji AS (2001) Substitution of tapioca flour with surimi powder in traditional crackers. In: 16th Scientific Conference Nutrition Society of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 24–25 MarchGoogle Scholar
  24. ISIRI (2003) Vegetable protein and its product, cutlet powder; specifications and test methods. Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran, ISIRI nr. 6935Google Scholar
  25. Jay JM (1992) Modern Food Microbiology, 4th edn. Chapman & Hall, New York, USA, pp 356–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim S, Park JB, Hwang IK (2002) Quality attributes of various varieties of Korean red pepper powder (Capsicum annum L.) and colour stability during sunlight exposure. J Food Sci 67:2957–2961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kristbergsson K (2001) From ideas to products concepts and prototype. In: Food Innovation Management; from Idea to Success, Treillon R (ed), Food Net, ENSIA, Massy, p 72–82Google Scholar
  28. Meilgaard M, Civille GV, Carr BT (2007) Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 4th edn. CRC Press, New York, pp 56–87Google Scholar
  29. Min TS, Cheng NM, Fujiwara T, Kuang HK, Hasegawa H (1987) Handbook on the Processing of Frozen Surimi and Fish Jelly Products in Southeast Asia. Marine Fisheries Research Development, MFRD, Singapore, pp 10–18Google Scholar
  30. Modi VK, Sachindra NM, Nagegowda P, Mahendrakar NS, Rao DN (2007) Quality changes during the storage of dehydrated chicken kebab mix. Int J Food Sci Tech 42:827–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Musa KH, Aminah A, Wan-Aida WM (2005) Functional properties of surimi related to drying methods. Malays Appl Biol 2:83–87Google Scholar
  32. Myrland O, Trondsen T, Johnston RS, Lund E (2000) Determinants of seafood consumption in Norway: lifestyle, revealed preferences, and barriers to consumption. Food Qual Prefer 11:169–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Niki H, Igarashi S (1982) Some factors in the production of active fish protein powder. Bull Japan Soc Sci Fish 8:1133–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Niki H, Deya E, Kato T, Igarashi S (1982) The process of producing active fish protein powder. Bull Japan Soc Sci Fish 7:999–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Niki H, Kato T, Deya E, Igarashi S (1983) Water holding capacity, emulsifying capacity and storage ability of active fish protein powder. Bull Japan Soc Sci Fish 1:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Osuna-Garcia JA, Wall MM, Waddell CA (1997) Natural antioxidants for preventing colour loss in stored paprika. J Food Sci 62:1017–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Park JW, Lin JTM (2005) Surimi: Manufacturing and evaluation. In: Surimi and Surimi Seafood, 2nd edn, Park JW (ed), Taylor and Francis Group. London, p 33–106Google Scholar
  38. Rafipour F, Jalili H, Arshad R, Hoseini H, Shaviklo GR, Hosein-Abadi M (2008) Development and evaluation of fish balls made from silver carp (Hypophthal molitrix) mince with and without starch. Iranian Fisheries Research Organization. Project Report nr. 03-8401-84002, Tehran, IranGoogle Scholar
  39. Ramirez JA, Diaz-Sobac R, Morales OG, Vazquez M (1999) Evaluation of freeze-dried surimi from tilapia and fat sleeper as emulsifiers. CyTA J Food 4:210–214Google Scholar
  40. Ruhil P, Singh RRB, Jain DK, Patel AA, Patil GR (2010) A comparative study of kinetic and connectionist modelling for shelf-life prediction of Basundi mix. J Food Sci Technol 48(2):204–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sathivel S, Bechtel PJ, Babbitt JK, Prinyawiwatkul W, Patterson M (2005) Functional, nutritional and rheological properties of protein powders from arrow tooth flounder and their application in mayonnaise. J Food Sci 2:57–63Google Scholar
  42. Sathivel S, Bechtel PJ, Prinyawiwatkul W (2006) Physicochemical and rheological properties of salmon protein powders. Int J Food Eng 2:3–9Google Scholar
  43. Senthil A, Mamatha BS, Vishwanath P, Bhat KK, Ravishankar GA (2010) Studies on development and storage stability of instant spice adjunct mix from seaweed (Eucheuma). J Food Sci Technol. doi: 10.1007/s13197-010-0165-3
  44. Shaviklo GR (2000) Manual on surimi and surimi-based products; using local fish species. Naghsh-e Mehr publication, Tehran, Iran, pp 24–56Google Scholar
  45. Shaviklo GR (2005a) Production of shrimp burger in Iran. INFOFISH Int Mag 2:31–34Google Scholar
  46. Shaviklo GR (2005b) Surimi products gain popularity in Iran. INFOFISH Int Mag 5:35–40Google Scholar
  47. Shaviklo GR (2006) Quality improvement of farmed fish in Iranian markets. Aquaculture Asia 3:30–32Google Scholar
  48. Shaviklo GR (2007) Fish sausage from silver carp surimi. INFOFISH Int Mag 1:34–38Google Scholar
  49. Shaviklo GR, Thorkelsson G, Kristinsson HG, Arason S, Sveinsdottir K (2010a) The influence of additives and drying methods on quality attributes of fish protein powder made from saithe (Pollachius virens). J Sci Food Agric 90:2133–2143Google Scholar
  50. Shaviklo GR, Olafsdottir A, Sveinsdottir K, Thorkelsson G, Rafipour F (2010b) Quality characteristics and consumer acceptance of a high fish protein puffed corn-fish snack. J Food Sci Technol. doi: 10.1007/s13197-010-0191-1
  51. Shaviklo GR, Thorkelsson G, Sigurgisladottir S, Rafipour F (2010c) Quality changes during storage of extruded puffed corn snacks incorporated with freeze dried saithe (Pollachius virens) protein and stabilized minces from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix). J Sci Food Agric doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4261
  52. Shaviklo GR, Thorkelsson G, Arason S, Sveinsdottir K (2011a) Characteristics of freeze-dried fish protein isolated from saithe (Pollachius virens). J Food Sci Technol. doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0285-4
  53. Shaviklo GR, Thorkelsson G, Sveinsdottir K, Rafipour F (2011b) Chemical properties and sensory quality of ice cream fortified with fish protein. J Sci Food Agric. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4299
  54. Shilat (2005) Fish consumer’s sociology. Research and Planning Division of Iran Fisheries Organization, Tehran, IranGoogle Scholar
  55. Shilat (2007) An investigation on fish consumption behaviour of consumers in Tehran. Research and Planning Division of Iran Fisheries Organization, Tehran, IranGoogle Scholar
  56. Shilat (2008) Iran Fisheries Statistics. Research and Planning Division of Iran Fisheries Organization, Tehran. IranGoogle Scholar
  57. Tarladgis BG, Watts BM, Younathan MT (1960) A distillation method for the quantitative determination of malonaldehyde in rancid foods. JAOCS 37:44–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thorner ME (1973) Convenience and Fast Food Handbook. AVI Publishing Co. Westport, Connecticut, USA, pp 229–245Google Scholar
  59. Tomoszek D (2002) What is a ready meal? In: Menlove A (ed) Ready Meal Technology. Leatherhead Publishing, Surrey, England, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  60. WHO/FAO (2001) Recommended international code of practice general principles of food hygiene. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  61. Yerlikaya P, Gokoglu N, Uran H (2005) Quality changes of fish patties produced from anchovy during refrigerated storage. Eur Food Res Technol 220:287–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Reza Shaviklo
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Gudjon Thorkelsson
    • 1
    • 3
  • Kolbrun Sveinsdottir
    • 3
  • Fatemeh Pourreza
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, School of Health SciencesUniversity of IcelandReykjavikIceland
  2. 2.Iran Fisheries Research Organization (IFRO)TehranIran
  3. 3.Matis (Icelandic Food and Biotech R&D)ReykjavikIceland
  4. 4.Zardaneh Soy Protein ProductsEsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations