Advertisement

Journal of Food Science and Technology

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 224–229 | Cite as

Development of dietary fiber rich chicken meat patties using wheat and oat bran

  • S. Talukder
  • D. P. SharmaEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Dietary fiber rich chicken meat patties were developed by incorporating wheat and oat bran to chicken meat at 5, 10 and 15% levels. Oat bran contained higher amount of soluble dietary fiber (SDF) and unsaturated fatty acids (USFA) than wheat bran, whereas total dietary fiber (TDF), insoluble dietary fiber (IDF) and saturated fatty acids (SFA) were higher in wheat bran. Incorporation of bran significantly increased the water holding capacity (WHC) and emulsion stability (ES). Oat bran showed better effect on WHC and ES than wheat bran. Addition of bran resulted in significant increase in cooking yield, firmness, TDF, USFA and reduction in sensory attributes, moisture, protein, fat and cholesterol content. IDF was higher in wheat bran added patties and SDF and SFA/USFA ratio in oat bran added patties. It is concluded that oat and wheat bran can be incorporated up to 10 and 15% level, respectively for preparation of baked and steamed chicken patties.

Keywords

Dietary fiber Chicken meat patties Chemical Physico-chemical Sensory properties 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angelo AJ St, Vercellotti JR, Legendre MG, Vinnett CH, Kuan JW, James C Jr., Dupuy HP (1987) Chemical instrumental analysis of warmed over flavor in beef. J Food Sci 52:1163–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AOAC (1995) Official methods of analysis, 16th edn, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Babu NP, Kowale BN, Rao VK, Bisht GS (1994) Effect of cooking and storage on lipid oxidation and development of cholesterol oxides in chicken meat. Indian J Poult Sci 29:254–257Google Scholar
  4. Baliga BR, Madaiah N (1970) Quality of sausage emulsion prepared from mutton. J Food Sci 35:383–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Best D (1991) Whatever happened to fiber. Prepared Food 160:54–56Google Scholar
  6. Bouton PE, Harris PV, Shorthorn WR (1971) Effect of ultimate pH upon the water holding capacity and tenderness of mutton. J Food Sci 36:435–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang HC, Carpenter JA (1997) Optimizing quality of frankfurters containing oat bran and added water. J Food Sci 62:194–197, 202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cofrades S, Guerra MA, Carballo J, Fernandez-Martin F, Jimenez-Colmenero F (2000) Plasma protein and soy fiber content effect on bologna sausage properties as influenced by fat level. J Food Sci 65:281–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawkins NL, Phelps O, Mcmillan KW, Forrester IT (1999) Composition and physicochemical properties of chevon meat patties containing oat bran. J Food Sci 64:597–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Englyst H, Wiggins HS, Cummings JH (1982) Determination of the non starch polysaccharides in plant foods by gas-liquid chromatography of constituent sugars as alditol acetate. Analyst 107:307–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernandez-Gines JM, Fernandez-Lopez J, Sayas-Barbera E, Perez-Alvarez JA (2005) Meat products as functional food: A review. J Food Sci 70:R37–R43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Furda I (1981) Simultaneous analysis of soluble, insoluble dietary fibre. In: The analysis of dietary fibre in food, James WPT, Theander O (eds), Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, pp 163–172Google Scholar
  13. Garcia ML, Dominguez R, Garlvez MD, Casas C, Sergas MD (2002) Utilization of cereal and fruit fibers in low-fat dry fermented sausage. Meat Sci 60:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horn LV (1997) Fiber, lipids, and coronary heart disease: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Nutrition Committee, American Heart Association Circulation 95:2701–2704Google Scholar
  15. Huffman DL, Mikel WB, Egbert WR, Chen C, Smith KL (1992) Development of lean pork sausage products. Cereal Food World 37:439–442Google Scholar
  16. Hughes E, Cofrades S, Troy DJ (1997) Effect of fat level, oat fiber and carrageenan on frankfurters formulated with 5, 12 and 30% fat. Meat Sci 453:273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hwang JK, Kim CT, Cho SJ, Kim CJ (1995) Effect of various thermal treatments on physicochemical properties of wheat bran. Korean J Food Sci Technol 27:394–403Google Scholar
  18. Janicki LJ, Appledorf H (1974) Effect of broiling, grill frying and microwave cooking on moisture, some lipid components and total fatty acids of ground beef. J Food Sci 39:715–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jaskari J, Henriksson K, Nieminen A, Suortti T, Salovaara H, Poutanen K (1995) Effect of hydrothermal and enzymatic treatments on the viscous behavior of dry and wet-milled oat bran. Cereal Chem 72:625–631Google Scholar
  20. Johnson IT, Southgate DAT (1994) Dietary fiber and related substances. In: Food safety science, Edelman J, Miller S (eds), Champman and Hill. London, p 39–65Google Scholar
  21. Kaeferstein FK, Clugston GA (1995) Human health problems related to meat production and consumption. Fleischwirtschaft 75:889–892Google Scholar
  22. Luddy FE, Bardford RA, Herb SF, Paul M (1968) A rapid quantitative procedure for the preparation of methyl esters of butter, fat and other fats. J Am Oil Chem Soc 45:549–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mansour EH, Khalil AH (1999) Characteristics of low fat beef burgers as influenced by various types of wheat fibers. J Sci Food Agric 79:493–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ranhotra GS, Gelroth JA, Glaser BK, Reddy PV (1994) Nutritional profile of a fraction from air-classified bran obtained from a hard red wheat. Cereal Chem 71:321–324Google Scholar
  25. Sharma DP, Sharma A, Gupta SK (2005) Lipid profile of chicken meat patties as affected by additives and cooking methods. J Food Sci Technol 42:299–302Google Scholar
  26. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1989) Statistical methods. 8th edn, The Iowa State University Press, Ames, IowaGoogle Scholar
  27. Southgate DA, Hudson GJ, Englyst H (1978) The analysis of dietary fibre: the choice for the analyst. J Sci Food Agric 29:979–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thebaudin JY, Lefevre AC, Harrington M, Bourgeois CM (1997) Dietary fibers: nutritional and technological interest. Tr Food Sci Technol 8:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Trout ES, Hunt MC, Jhonson DE, Clans JR, Castner CL, Kropf DH (1992) Characteristics of low fat ground beef containing texture modifying ingredients. J Food Sci 57:19–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wardlaw FR, McCaskill LH, Acton JC (1973) Effects of postmortem changes on poultry meat loaf properties. J Food Sci 38:421–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yasarlar EE, Daglioglu O, Yilmaz I (2007) Effect of cereal bran addition on chemical composition, cooking characteristics and sensory properties of Turkish meat balls. Asian J Chem 19:2353–2361Google Scholar
  32. Yilmaz I (2004) Effects of rye bran addition on fatty acid composition and quality characteristics of low fat meat balls. Meat Sci 67:245–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yilmaz I (2005) Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of low fat meat balls with added wheat bran. J Food Eng 69:369–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yilmaz I, Daglioglu O (2003) The Effect of replacing fat with oat bran on fatty acid composition and physicochemical properties of meatballs. Meat Sci 65:819–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Animal Products TechnologyCCS Haryana Agricultural UniversityHisarIndia

Personalised recommendations