Stop making sense of Bell’s theorem and nonlocality?
In a recent paper on Foundations of Physics, Stephen Boughn reinforces a view that is more shared in the area of the foundations of quantum mechanics than it would deserve, a view according to which quantum mechanics does not require nonlocality of any kind and the common interpretation of Bell theorem as a nonlocality result is based on a misunderstanding. In the present paper I argue that this view is based on an incorrect reading of the presuppositions of the EPR argument and the Bell theorem and, as a consequence, is unfounded.
KeywordsBell’s theorem Non-locality Classicality Counterfactuality
- Bell, J.S. (1964). On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics, 1, 195–200 (reprinted in Bell 2004, 14–21).Google Scholar
- Boughn, S. (2017). Making sense of Bell’s theorem and quantum nonlocality. Foundations of Physics, 47, 640–657.Google Scholar
- C-F-QM (1962) Conference on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Physics Department, Xavier University.Google Scholar
- Einstein, A. (1935). AE 22-047, Albert Einstein Archive at the Jewish National and University Library, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
- Gachechiladze, M., Budroni, C., & Gühne, O. (2016). Extreme violation of local realism in quantum hypergraph states. Physical Review Letters, 116, 070401.Google Scholar
- Ghirardi, G. C., & Grassi, R. (1994). Outcome predictions and property attribution: the EPR argument reconsidered. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 25, 397–423.Google Scholar
- Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., & Weber, T. (1980). A general argument against superluminal transmission through the quantum mechanical measurement process. Lettere al Nuovo Cimento, 27, 293–298.Google Scholar
- Ghirardi, G. C., Grassi, R., Butterfield, J., & Fleming, G. N. (1993). Parameter dependence and outcome dependence in dynamical models for state vector reduction. Foundations of Physics, 23, 341–364.Google Scholar
- Goldstein, S. (2017) Bohmian Mechanics”, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, E. N. Zalta (ed.),<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/qm-bohm/>.
- Griffiths, R. B. (2011). EPR, Bell and quantum locality. American Journal of Physics, 79, 954–965.Google Scholar
- Howard, D. (1985). Einstein on locality and separability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 16, 171–201.Google Scholar
- Howard, D. (2007). Revisiting the Einstein–Bohr dialogue. Iyyun: Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly, 56, 57–90.Google Scholar
- Jarrett, J. (1984). On the physical significance of the locality conditions in the Bell arguments. Nous, 18, 569–589.Google Scholar
- Laudisa, F. (2008). Non-local realistic theories and the scope of the Bell theorem. Foundations of Physics, 38, 1110–1132.Google Scholar
- Laudisa F. (2012). The uninvited guest: ‘local realism’ and the Bell theorem. In H. De Regt, S. Hartmann, & S. Okasha (eds.), EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009, Springer, Berlin, pp. 137–149.Google Scholar
- Laudisa F., Rovelli C. (2013) Relational Quantum Mechanics”, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2013 Edition), E.N. Zalta (ed.), <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/qm-relational/>.
- Maudlin T. (1994). 20113, Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity. The Metaphysical Intimations of Modern Physics, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.Google Scholar
- Maudlin, T. (2011). How Bell reasoned: a reply to Griffiths. American Journal of Physics, 79, 966–970.Google Scholar
- Maudlin, T. (2014). What Bell did. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 47, 424010.Google Scholar
- Norsen, T. (2007). Against ‘realism’. Foundations of Physics, 37, 311–340.Google Scholar
- Pawloski, M., & Brukner, C. (2009). Monogamy of Bell’s inequality violations in nonsignaling theories. Physical Review Letters, 102, 0030403.Google Scholar
- Peres, A. (1978). Unperformed measurements have no result. American Journal of Physics, 46, 745–747.Google Scholar
- Peres, A., & Terno, D. (2004). Quantum information and relativity theory. Reviews of Modern Physics, 76, 93–123.Google Scholar
- Redhead, M. (1987). Incompleteness, Nonlocality and Realism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Shimony, A. (1984) Controllable and uncontrollable non-locality, In Kamefuchi, S. et al. (eds.) Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in Light of the New Technology, The Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo (reprinted in A. Shimony, Search for a Naturalistic Worldview, vol. II, pp. 130–139, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1993).Google Scholar
- Smerlak, M., & Rovelli, C. (2007). Relational EPR. Foundations of Physics, 37, 427–445.Google Scholar
- Stapp, H.P. (1975). Bell’s theorem and world process. Nuovo Cimento, 29B, 270–276.Google Scholar
- Werner, R. (2014). Comment on ‘What Bell did’. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 47, 424011.Google Scholar
- Whitaker, A. (2016). Richard Feynman and Bell’s theorem. American Journal of Physics, 84, 493–494.Google Scholar
- Zukovski, M., & Brukner, C. (2014). Quantum nonlocality – it ain’t necessarily so…. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 47, 424009.Google Scholar