The context distinction: controversies over feminist philosophy of science

Original paper in Philosophy of Science

DOI: 10.1007/s13194-011-0031-9

Cite this article as:
Aufrecht, M. Euro Jnl Phil Sci (2011) 1: 373. doi:10.1007/s13194-011-0031-9


The “context of discovery” and “context of justification” distinction has been used by Noretta Koertge and Lynn Hankinson Nelson in debates over the legitimacy of feminist approaches to philosophy of science. Koertge uses the context distinction to focus the conversation by barring certain approaches. I contend this focus masks points of true disagreement about the nature of justification. Nonetheless, Koertge raises important questions that have been too quickly set aside by some. I conclude that the context distinction should not be used to block feminist philosophy of science because the use of the context distinction is deeply ambiguous, masking underlying debates about naturalism and the nature of justification.


Context of discovery Context of justification Values in science Justification Feminist epistemology 

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Linfield CollegeMcMinnvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations