The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 108–112 | Cite as

Age Changes in Horizontal Condylar Angle: A Clinical and Cephalometric Study

  • T. Sreelal
  • Kavitha Janardanan
  • Amal S. Nair
  • Anjana S. Nair
Original Article


Determination of condylar inclination is important when restoring the occlusal surfaces of teeth. It is important to know the changing trends in horizontal condylar inclination with age so as to have an idea about the cuspal morphology. Aims and objectives: a) to determine the effect of age changes in horizontal condylar inclination using articulator method and radiographic method (cephalometry) b) to compare the values of horizontal condylar inclination obtained using articulator method with that of cephalometric method c) to ascertain the symmetry of horizontal condylar angle on both right and left side on an articulator. 40 dentulous individuals with Angle’s class I occlusion were selected for the study. They were divided into four groups Group I: 20–29 years, Group II: 30–39 years, Group III: 40–49 years, Group IV: 50–59 years. Horizontal condylar inclination was determined on right and left side for each individual using protrusive interocclusal record in a Dentatus (ARL) semiadjustable articulator. Cephalometric recording was carried out twice on the left side, once in centric occlusion position and then in protrusive position. The two radiographs were superimposed to draw a line connecting the shifting position of condylion on an acetate tracing paper. This line when joined with Frankfurt horizontal plane gives the horizontal condylar inclination. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that there was a significant difference in horizontal condylar angle values in all the four groups which were statistically significant. There is a decrease in horizontal condylar angle values from Group I to Group IV. Horizontal condylar values obtained by articulator method and cephalometric method showed no significant difference for all the four groups tested. When horizontal condylar values obtained on right and left sides of Dentatus articulator were compared there was not much of a significant difference. Horizontal condylar values showed a decreasing trend with increasing age, i.e, as age advances there is a flattening of condylar head. Both articulator and cephalometric method yielded no significantly different values and hence both the methods can be used for determining condylar inclination. The difference in values of horizontal condylar angle on right and left sides were insignificant.


Horizontal condylar angle Dentatus articulator Cephalometry 


  1. 1.
    The Glossary of Prosthodontic terms, 8th edn (2005) Academy of Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 94(1):10–92Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jose dos Santos Jr (1999) Occlusion Principles and Concepts 2nd edn. Ishiyaku Euro America, Inc. U.S.A 45Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ratzmann A, Mundt T, Schwahn C, Langforth G, Hutzen D, Gedrange T, Kordass B (2007) Comparative clinical investigation of horizontal condylar inclination using the JMA electronic recording system and a protrusive wax record for setting articulators. Int J Comput Dent 10(3):265–284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Curtis DA (1989) A comparison of protrusive records to pantographic tracings. J Prosthet Dent 62:154–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hernandez AI, Jasinevicius TR, Kaleinikova Z, Sadan A (2010) Symmetry of horizontal and sagittal condylar path angles:an in vivo study. Cranio 28(1):60–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tannamala PK, Pulagam M, Pottem SR, Swapna B (2012) Condylar Guidance:Correlation between Protrusive Interocclusal Record and Panoramic Radiographic Image: A Pilot Study. J Prostho 21(3):181–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zarb GA, Bolender CL (2004) Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients: Complete dentures and implant-supported prosthesis, 12th edn. Mosby, St Louis, p 294Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Takayama Y, Miura E, Yuasa M, Kobayashi K, Hosoi T (2008) Comparison of occlusal condition and prevalence of bone change in the condyle of patients with and without temporomandibular disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 105(1):104–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Muir CB, Goss AN (1990) The radiologic morphology of asymptomatic temporomandibular joints. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 70(3):349–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mathew AL, Sholapurkar AA, Pai KM (2011) Condylar Changes and Its Association with Age, TMD, and Dentition Status: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Dent 2011:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cohen R (1956) The relationship of anterior guidance to condylar guidance in mandibular movement. J Prosthet Dent 6:758–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shillingburg T, Herbert T, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE (1997) Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics, 3rd edn. Quintessence Publishing Co, Illinois, pp 42–81Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goyal MK, Goyal S (2011) A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study. Indian J Dent Res 22(6):880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nandini VV, Nair KC, Sudhakar MC, Poduval TS (2005) Comparative evaluation of hight tracer, Chandra tracer, intraoral tracer, functiograph and checkbite: a clinical study. J Indian Prostho Society 5(5):26–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Caro AG, Peraire M, Martinez-Gomis J, Anglada JM, Samso J (2005) Reproducibility of lateral excursive tooth contact in a semi-adjustable articulator depending on the type of lateral guidance. J Oral Rehabil 32:174–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ash MM, Ramfjord S (1995) Occlusion in operative and restorative dentistry. In: Ash MM, Ramfjord S (eds) Occlusion, 4th edn. W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, pp 422–423Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Prosthodontic Society 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Sreelal
    • 1
    • 3
  • Kavitha Janardanan
    • 1
  • Amal S. Nair
    • 2
  • Anjana S. Nair
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ProsthodonticsSree Mookambika Institute of Dental SciencesKulasekharamIndia
  2. 2.Department of OrthodonticsSree Mookambika Institute of Dental SciencesKulasekharamIndia
  3. 3.TrivandrumIndia

Personalised recommendations