A Cancer Education-Plus-Navigation Intervention Implemented Within a Federally Qualified Health Center and Community-Based Settings

  • Cynthia M. MojicaEmail author
  • Gulaiim Almatkyzy
  • Daisy Morales-Campos


Despite the availability of effective cancer screening tests, Latinos are screened at lower rates than non-Hispanic Whites. We implemented and evaluated the effectiveness of an evidence-based community health worker (CHW) cancer education-plus-navigation intervention designed to increase cancer screening, knowledge of screening guidelines, and the benefit of early detection. The project included a community and clinic component and served a primarily Latino population. In collaboration with a federally qualified health center (FQHC) and three community-based organizations, bilingual/bicultural CHWs recruited men and women (not up-to-date with the cancer screening guidelines) from a FQHC and the community. Participants received education plus navigation and no-cost cancer screening tests. Together with the FQHC, we outlined eligibility criteria, project protocols, project implementation, and evaluation activities. With the community organizations, we outlined recruitment protocols—when to recruit, how to recruit, and connections with other organizations. CHWs enrolled 3045 men and women into the education-plus-navigation intervention. Overall, 71% received at least one cancer screening. Stratifying by gender, 72% of women received at least one cancer screening test whereas 63% of enrolled men received a test for colorectal cancer. Knowledge of screening guidelines and the belief in early detection also increased from baseline to follow-up. Our evidence-based education-plus-navigation intervention successfully reached large numbers of underserved men and women and yielded positive changes in cancer screening and knowledge of screening guidelines and the belief in early detection. The inclusion of a clinic and community component ensured success of the project.


Cancer screening Federally qualified health center Community-based settings Community health workers Early detection 



This study was supported by the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas through grant no. PP120050.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


  1. 1.
    American Cancer Society (ed) (2018) Cancer Facts & Figures for Hispanics/Latinos 2018-2020. ed. American Cancer Society Inc, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Valdovinos C, Penedo FJ, Isasi CR, Jung M, Kaplan RC, Espinoza Giacinto R, Gonzalez P, Malcarne VL, Perreira K, Salgado H, Simon MA, Wruck LM, Greenlee HA (2016) Perceived discrimination and cancer screening behaviors in us Hispanics: the Hispanic community health study/study of Latinos sociocultural ancillary study. Cancer Causes Control 27(1):27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mojica CM, Morales-Campos DY, Carmona CM, Ouyang Y, Liang Y (2016) Breast, cervical, and colorectal Cancer education and navigation: results of a community health worker intervention. Health Promot Pract 17(3):353–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Watts L, Joseph N, Velazquez A et al (2009) Understanding barriers to cervical cancer screening among Hispanic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201(2):199.e191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Perry HB, Zulliger R, Rogers MM (2014) Community health workers in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: an overview of their history, recent evolution, and current effectiveness. Annu Rev Public Health 35:399–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Molokwu J, Penaranda E, Flores S, Shokar NK (2016) Evaluation of the effect of a promotora-led educational intervention on cervical cancer and human papillomavirus knowledge among predominantly Hispanic primary care patients on the US-Mexico border. J Cancer Educ 31(4):742–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ramsay A, Schneider J (2012) Improving cancer prevention and control: how state health agencies can support patient navigators and community health workers. Association of State and Territorial Health Organizations, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thompson B, Vilchis H, Moran C, Copeland W, Holte S, Duggan C (2014) Increasing cervical cancer screening in the United States-Mexico border region. J Rural Health 30(2):196–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Molina Y, Thompson B, Espinoza N, Ceballos R (2013) Breast cancer interventions serving US-based Latinas: current approaches and directions. Womens Health (Lond) 9(4):335–348 quiz 349-350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gonzalez SA, Ziebarth TH, Wang J, Noor AB, Springer DL (2012) Interventions promoting colorectal cancer screening in the Hispanic population: a review of the literature. J Nurs Scholarsh 44(4):332–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roland KB, Milliken EL, Rohan EA, DeGroff A, White S, Melillo S, Rorie WE, Signes CAC, Young PA (2017) Use of community health workers and patient navigators to improve Cancer outcomes among patients served by federally qualified health centers: a systematic literature review. Health Equity 1(1):61–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    American Cancer Society (2019) History of ACS Recommendations for the Early Detection of Cancer in People Without Symptoms. Available from: Accessed 22 Jan 2019
  13. 13.
    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2012) Cervical Cancer: screening. Available from: Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  14. 14.
    Battaglia TA, Roloff K, Posner MA, Freund KM (2007) Improving follow-up to abnormal breast cancer screening in an urban population. A patient navigation intervention. Cancer Nurs 109(2 Suppl):359–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dohan D, Schrag D (2005) Using navigators to improve care of underserved patients: current practices and approaches. Cancer 104(4):848–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baren JM, Shofer FS, Ivey B, Reinhard S, DeGeus J, Stahmer SA, Panettieri R, Hollander JE (2001) A randomized, controlled trial of a simple emergency department intervention to improve the rate of primary care follow-up for patients with acute asthma exacerbations. Ann Emerg Med 38(2):115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Viswanathan M, Kraschenewski J, Nishikawa B et al (2009) Outcomes of community health workers interventions AHRQ publication no. 09-E014. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MDGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ortega AN, Rodriguez HP, Vargas Bustamante A (2015) Policy dilemmas in Latino health care and implementation of the affordable care act. Annu Rev Public Health 36:525–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Documet PI, Macia L, Thompson A, Gonzalez M, Boyzo R, Fox AR, Guadamuz TE (2016) A male Promotores network for Latinos: process evaluation from a community-based participatory project. Health Promot Pract 17(3):332–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kok MC, Kane SS, Tulloch O, Ormel H, Theobald S, Dieleman M, Taegtmeyer M, Broerse JEW, de Koning KAM (2015) How does context influence performance of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries? Evidence from the literature. Health Res Policy Syst 13(1):13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grant M, Wilford A, Haskins L, Phakathi S, Mntambo N, Horwood CM (2017) Trust of community health workers influences the acceptance of community-based maternal and child health services. Afr J Prim Health Care Family Med 9(1):1281Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ayala GX, Vaz L, Earp JA, Elder JP, Cherrington A (2010) Outcome effectiveness of the lay health advisor model among Latinos in the United States: an examination by role. Health Educ Res 25(5):815–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Balcazar H, Rosenthal EL, Brownstein JN, Rush CH, Matos S, Hernandez L (2011) Community health workers can be a public health force for change in the United States: three actions for a new paradigm. Am J Public Health 101(12):2199–2203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hynes DM, Buscemi J, Quintiliani LM (2015) Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) position statement: SBM supports increased efforts to integrate community health workers into the patient-centered medical home. Transl Behav Med 5(4):483–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association for Cancer Education 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Public Health and Human SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.College of Public Health and Human SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  3. 3.Latino Research InitiativeThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations