Advertisement

A Qualitative Exploration of Women’s Experiences with a Community Health Volunteer-Led Cervical Cancer Educational Module in Migori County, Kenya

  • Yujung ChoiEmail author
  • Sandra Y. Oketch
  • Konyin Adewumi
  • Elizabeth Bukusi
  • Megan J. Huchko
Article
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

Detection and treatment of human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical precancer through screening programs is an effective way to reduce cervical cancer deaths. However, high cervical cancer mortality persists in low- and middle-income countries. As screening programs become more widely available, it is essential to understand how knowledge about cervical cancer and perceived disease risk impacts screening uptake and acceptability. We evaluated women’s experiences with a cervical cancer education strategy led by community health volunteers (CHVs) in Migori County, Kenya, as part of a cluster randomized controlled trial of cervical cancer screening implementation strategies. The educational modules employed simple language and images and sought to increase understanding of the relationship between HPV and cervical cancer, the mechanisms of self-collected HPV testing, and the importance of cervical cancer screening. Modules took place in three different contexts throughout the study: (1) during community mobilization; (2) prior to screening in either community health campaigns or health facilities; and (3) prior to treatment. Between January and September 2016, we conducted in-depth interviews with 525 participants to assess their experience with various aspects of the screening program. After the context-specific educational modules, women reported increased awareness of cervical cancer screening and willingness to screen, described HPV- and cervical cancer-related stigma and emphasized the use of educational modules to reduce stigma. Some misconceptions about cervical cancer were evident. With effective and context-specific training, lay health workers, such as CHVs, can help bridge the gap between cervical cancer screening uptake and acceptability.

Keywords

Community health volunteer education Cervical cancer screening HPV testing In-depth interviews Kenya 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the participants as well as the health care providers and research assistants for their support of and contributions to this project. We would also like to acknowledge for Katelyn Bryant-Comstock for assistance with editing of this manuscript.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors were involved in the preparation, review, and editing of the final manuscript. MJH conceptualized the study and led the data collection. SO and EB led study activities on the ground and assisted in conceptualization of the analysis. YC wrote the manuscript with contributions from the authorship team (SO, KA, EB, and MJH).

Funding Information

This study was funded by the National Cancer Institute, R01 CA188428.

Compliance with ethical standards

Written informed consent was obtained from each participant in her preferred language and ethical approval was obtained from the Kenya Medical Research Institute Ethical Review Committee, Duke University and the University of California, San Francisco’s Committee on Human Research.

References

  1. 1.
    Finocchario-Kessler S, Wexler C, Maloba M, Mabachi N, Ndikum-Moffor F, Bukusi E (2016) Cervical cancer prevention and treatment research in Africa: a systematic review from a public health perspective. BMC Womens Health 16:29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Louie KS, de Sanjose S, Mayaud P (2009) Epidemiology and prevention of human papillomavirus and cervical cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: a comprehensive review. Tropical Med Int Health 14(10):1287–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    White HL, Mulambia C, Sinkala M, Mwanahamuntu MH, Parham GP, Moneyham L, Grimley DM, Chamot E (2012) ‘Worse than HIV’ or ‘not as serious as other diseases’? Conceptualization of cervical cancer among newly screened women in Zambia. Soc Sci Med 74(10):1486–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ngugi CW, Boga H, Muigai AW, Wanzala P, Mbithi JN (2012) Factors affecting uptake of cervical cancer early detection measures among women in Thika, Kenya. Health Care Women Int 33(7):595–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lyimo FS, Beran TN (2012) Demographic, knowledge, attitudinal, and accessibility factors associated with uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in a rural district of Tanzania: three public policy implications. BMC Public Health 12:22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Watson-Johnson LC, Bhagatwala J, Reyes-Garcia C, Hinojosa A, Mason M, Meade CD, Luque JS (2012) Refinement of an educational toolkit to promote cervical cancer screening among Hispanic immigrant women in rural southern Georgia. J Health Care Poor Underserved 23(4):1704–1711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drewry J, Garces-Palacio IC, Scarinci I (2010) Awareness and knowledge about human papillomavirus among Latina immigrants. Ethn Dis 20(4):327–333PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosser JI, Njoroge B, Huchko MJ (2015) Changing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding cervical cancer screening: the effects of an educational intervention in rural Kenya. Patient Educ Couns 98(7):884–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Williams M, Kuffour G, Ekuadzi E, Yeboah M, ElDuah M, Tuffour P (2013) Assessment of psychological barriers to cervical cancer screening among women in Kumasi, Ghana using a mixed methods approach. Afr Health Sci 13(4):1054–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Teng FF, Mitchell SM, Sekikubo M, Biryabarema C, Byamugisha JK, Steinberg M, Money DM, Ogilvie GS (2014) Understanding the role of embarrassment in gynaecological screening: a qualitative study from the ASPIRE cervical cancer screening project in Uganda. BMJ Open 4(4):e004783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paskett E, Tatum C, Rushing J, Michielutte R, Bell R, Long Foley K, Bittoni M, Dickinson SL, McAlearney AS, Reeves K (2006) Randomized trial of an intervention to improve mammography utilization among a triracial rural population of women. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(17):1226–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    O'Brien MJ, Halbert CH, Bixby R, Pimentel S, Shea JA (2010) Community health worker intervention to decrease cervical cancer disparities in Hispanic women. J Gen Intern Med 25(11):1186–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Perry HB, Zulliger R, Rogers MM (2014) Community health workers in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: an overview of their history, recent evolution, and current effectiveness. Annu Rev Public Health 35:399–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nuno T, Martinez ME, Harris R, García F (2011) A Promotora-administered group education intervention to promote breast and cervical cancer screening in a rural community along the U.S.-Mexico border: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer Causes Control 22(3):367–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Taylor VM, Jackson JC, Yasui Y, Nguyen TT, Woodall E, Acorda E, Li L, Ramsey S (2010) Evaluation of a cervical cancer control intervention using lay health workers for Vietnamese American women. Am J Public Health 100(10):1924–1929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mock J, McPhee SJ, Nguyen T, Wong C, Doan H, Lai KQ, Nguyen KH, Nguyen TT, Bui-Tong N (2007) Effective lay health worker outreach and media-based education for promoting cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese American women. Am J Public Health 97(9):1693–1700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huchko MJ, Kahn JG, Smith JS, Hiatt RA, Cohen CR, Bukusi E (2017) Study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial to compare human papillomavirus based cervical cancer screening in community-health campaigns versus health facilities in western Kenya. BMC Cancer 17(1):826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    O'Brien MJ, Squires AP, Bixby RA, Larson SC (2009) Role development of community health workers: an examination of selection and training processes in the intervention literature. Am J Prev Med 37(6 Suppl 1):S262–S269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ragan KR, Buchanan Lunsford N, Lee Smith J, Saraiya M, Aketch M (2018) Perspectives of screening-eligible women and male partners on benefits of and barriers to treatment for precancerous lesions and cervical cancer in Kenya. Oncologist 23(1):35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tang TS, Funnell M, Sinco B, Piatt G, Palmisano G, Spencer MS, Kieffer EC, Heisler M (2014) Comparative effectiveness of peer leaders and community health workers in diabetes self-management support: results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 37(6):1525–1534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Allen JD, Stoddard AM, Mays J, Sorensen G (2001) Promoting breast and cervical cancer screening at the workplace: results from the Woman to Woman Study. Am J Public Health 91(4):584–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Menna T, Ali A, Worku A (2015) Effects of peer education intervention on HIV/AIDS related sexual behaviors of secondary school students in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a quasi-experimental study. Reprod Health 12:84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rose MA (1992) Evaluation of a peer-education program on heart disease prevention with older adults. Public Health Nurs 9(4):242–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Posavac EJ, Kattapong KR, Dew DR Jr (1999) Peer-based interventions to influence health-related behaviors and attitudes: a meta-analysis. Psychol Rep 85(3 Pt 2):1179–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association for Cancer Education 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Duke Global Health InstituteDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Center for Microbiology ResearchKenya Medical Research InstituteNairobiKenya
  3. 3.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  4. 4.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations