Advertisement

Journal of Cancer Education

, Volume 33, Issue 6, pp 1333–1340 | Cite as

Assessing Cancer Health Literacy among Spanish-Speaking Latinos

  • Margarita Echeverri
  • David Anderson
  • Anna María Nápoles
Article

Abstract

Health literacy is a dynamic construct that changes with specific health conditions; thus, new disease-specific health literacy tools are needed. Since cancer is the leading cause of death among Latinos, the largest and fastest-growing minority population in the nation, there is a need to develop tools to assess cancer health literacy (CHL) among the Spanish-speaking population. The Cancer Health Literacy Test, Spanish version (CHLT-30-DKspa) was applied to identify Spanish-speaking individuals with low CHL and ascertain which items in the tool best discriminate between CHL level groups. Cross-sectional field test of the CHLT-30-DKspa among Spanish-speaking Latinos. Latent class analysis (LCA) identified participants with varying CHL levels. Probability of correct answers, odds ratios, and standardized errors were used to identify the items that allow the classification of individuals among the latent classes. LCA resulted in a three-latent-class model predicting 39.4% of participants to be in the HIGH class, 43.3% in the MEDIUM class, and 17.3% in the LOW class. Eleven items (the CHLT-11-DKspa) meet the criteria to clearly separate participants with HIGH and LOW classes of CHL. Although the best model fit was a three-class solution, results showed a clear separation of individuals from HIGH versus LOW levels of CHL, but separation of those in the MEDIUM level was not as clear. The CHLT-11-DKspa is a shorter measure that may be relatively easy to use in a clinical encounter to identify Spanish-speaking patients with the poorest levels of CHL who may require additional support to understand medical instructions and care plans.

Keywords

Cancer health literacy Latinos Hispanics Assessment Psychometric evaluation Spanish Assessment tools Cancer literacy levels 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Grant Support

Dr. Magarita Echeverri’s contribution was supported in part by the Research Centers in Minority Institutions Program (RCMI) of the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) grant number 2G12MD007595, the NIMHD grant number 5S21MD0000100, and the grant number 1U54GM104940 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health which funds the Louisiana Clinical and Translational Science Center (LA CaTS). Dr. Anna María Nápoles’ contribution was supported by the Resource Centers for Minority Aging Research program of the National Institute on Aging grant number P30 AG15272 and the National Cancer Institute grant number 1U54CA153511.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Xavier University of Louisiana’s Institutional Review Board (study no. 511) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Supplementary material

13187_2017_1255_MOESM1_ESM.docx (94 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 94.2 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C (2006). The health literacy of America’s adults: results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006–483). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zarcadoolas C, Greer DS, Pleasant A (2006) Advancing health literacy: a framework for understanding and action. Wiley, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Institute of Medicine (2004) Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gazmararian JA, Williams MV, Peel J, Baker DW (2003) Health literacy and knowledge of chronic disease. Patient Educ Couns 51(3):267–275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shaw SJ, Armin J, Torres CH et al (2012) Chronic disease self-management and health literacy in four ethnic groups. J Health Commun 17(sup3):67–81CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heijmans M, Waverijn G, Rademakers J et al (2015) Functional, communicative and critical health literacy of chronic disease patients and their importance for self-management. Patient Educ Couns 98(1):41–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    U.S. Census Bureau (2015) Facts for features: Hispanic Heritage Month. Release Number CB15-FF.18, September 14, 2015. From http://www.census.gov/newsroom/facts-for-features/2015/cb15-ff18.html. Accessed 19 July 2017
  8. 8.
    Koskan A, Friedman DB, Hilfinger M, DeAnne K (2010) Health literacy among Hispanics: a systematic research review (1992–2008). Hispanic Health Care Int 8(2):65–76. doi: 10.1891/1540-4153.8.2.65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    American Cancer Society (2012) Cancer facts & figures for Hispanics/Latinos 2012–2014. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, 40 pGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buki LP, Yee WK, Weiterschan K, Lehardy E (2016) Essential qualitative inquiry in the development of a cancer literacy measure for immigrant women. Qual Health Res 26(5):640–648CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Betancourt H, Flynn PM, Riggs M, Garberoglio C (2010) A cultural research approach to instrument development: the case of breast and cervical cancer screening among Latino and Anglo women. Adv Access Publ 25(6):991–1007Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    William KP, Templin TN (2013) Bringing the real world to psychometric evaluation of cervical cancer literacy assessments with black, Latina, and Arab women in real-world settings. J Cancer Educ 28:738–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dumenci L, Matsumaya RK, Riddle DL et al (2014) Measurement of cancer health literacy and identification of patients with limited cancer health literacy. J Health Commun Int Perspect 19(sup2):205–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Institute of Medicine Roundtable on Health Literacy (2009) Measures of Health Literacy: Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2009. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK45384/, doi: 10.17226/12690
  15. 15.
    Collins LM, Lanza ST (2010) Latent class and latent transition analysis: with applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. Wiley, New York, 330 pGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McCutcheone AL (1987) Latent class analysis, Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, no 07–064. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthén BO (2007) Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct Equ Model 14(4):535–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dean M, Raftery AE (2010) Latent class analysis variable selection. Ann Inst Stat Math 62:11–35CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Linzer DA, Lewis JB (2011) poLCA: an R package for polytomous variable latent class analysis. J Stat Soft 42(10):1–29Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2012) Mplus user’s guide, 7th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nylund-Gibson K, Hart SR (2014: Chapter 21) Latent class analysis in prevention science. In: Sloboda Z, Petras H (eds) Defining Prevention Science. Springer, New York, pp 493–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Masyn K (2013). Applied Latent Class Analysis: A Workshop. Texas Tech University 2013. From http://www.depts.ttu.edu/immap/Masyn_LCAWorkshop_Dec2013_TTU.pdf. Accessed 19 July 2017
  23. 23.
    R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2011Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wurpts IC, Geiser C (2014) Is adding more indicators to a latent class analysis beneficial or detrimental? Results of a Monte-Carlo study. Front Psychol 5:920. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00920 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Echeverri M, Anderson D, Nápoles AM (2016) Cancer Health Literacy Test-30-Spanish (CHLT-30-DKspa), a new Spanish-language version of the Cancer Health Literacy Test (CHLT-30) for Spanish-speaking Latinos. J Health Commun Int Perspect 21(1):69–78. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1131777
  26. 26.
    Center for Health Care Strategies (2013) Health Literacy Fact Sheets. From http://www.chcs.org/media/CHCS_Health_Literacy_Fact_Sheets_2013.pdf. Accessed 19 July 2017

Copyright information

© American Association for Cancer Education 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Educational Coordinator Health Disparities, Diversity and Cultural Competence, Center for Minority Health and Health Disparities Research and EducationXavier University of Louisiana, College of PharmacyNew OrleansUSA
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsXavier University of LouisianaNew OrleansUSA
  3. 3.Department of Medicine, Center for Aging in Diverse CommunitiesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations