Advertisement

Journal of Cancer Education

, Volume 33, Issue 6, pp 1306–1313 | Cite as

Patients’ Perception of App-based Educational and Behavioural Interventions for Enhancing Oral Anticancer Medication Adherence

  • Eskinder Eshetu Ali
  • Jo Lene Leow
  • Lita Chew
  • Kevin Yi-Lwern Yap
Article

Abstract

Well-designed smartphone apps can potentially help in enhancing adherence to oral anticancer medications (OAMs). The objective of this study was to evaluate patients’ perception on inclusion of various adherence-enhancing strategies as features of an app and their interest in using such app. A cross-sectional survey was conducted at the National Cancer Centre Singapore. A structured self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from patients taking OAMs. Final analysis was based on 409 surveys and most of the respondents were female (291, 71.1%), Chinese (332, 81.2%), married (296, 72.4%) and breast cancer patients (211, 51.6%). Close to two-thirds of respondents rated medication information (65.0%), disease information (60.2%) and side effect self-management (60.2%) features as having the highest level of importance in an adherence app. Three hundred thirty-two (81.2%) of the respondents owned a smartphone, among which 92 (27.7%) reported using health-related apps. From respondents with smartphones, 219 (66.0%) were interested in using an app for OAM adherence. Age 65 and older compared to 21–54 years old (adjusted OR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.15–0.76) and current use of a health app (adjusted OR = 1.91; 95% CI = 1.07–3.41) were significant predictors of interest to adopt an adherence app. In conclusion, patients value the inclusion of educational and behavioural interventions in adherence apps. Developers of adherence apps should consider including tools for side effect self-management and provision of information to educate patients on their medications and disease condition.

Keywords

Adherence Oral anticancer medication Cancer Smartphone app Educational intervention 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all the pharmacy staff, at the National Cancer Centre Singapore, who helped in the process of data collection.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of Interest

None declared

Supplementary material

13187_2017_1248_MOESM1_ESM.docx (148 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 147 kb)
13187_2017_1248_MOESM2_ESM.docx (90 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 90 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Huang WC, Chen CY, Lin SJ, Chang CS (2016) Medication adherence to oral anticancer drugs: systematic review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 16(4):423–432CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Irwin M (2015) Theoretical foundations of adherence behaviors: synthesis and application in adherence to oral oncology agents. Clin J Oncol Nurs 19(3 Suppl):31–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Verbrugghe M, Verhaeghe S, Lauwaert K, Beeckman D, Van Hecke A (2013) Determinants and associated factors influencing medication adherence and persistence to oral anticancer drugs: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 39(6):610–621CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nieuwlaat R, Wilczynski N, Navarro T, Hobson N, Jeffery R, Keepanasseril A, Agoritsas T et al (2014) Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000011.pub4 (11):Cd000011
  5. 5.
    Spoelstra SL, Sansoucie H (2015) Putting evidence into practice: evidence-based interventions for oral agents for cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs 19(3 Suppl):60–72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roter DL, Hall JA, Merisca R, Nordstrom B, Cretin D, Svarstad B (1998) Effectiveness of interventions to improve patient compliance: a meta-analysis. Med Care 36(8):1138–1161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dayer L, Heldenbrand S, Anderson P, Gubbins P, Martin B (2013) Smartphone medication adherence apps: potential benefits to patients and providers. J Am Pharm Assoc 53(2):172–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fishbein JN, Nisotel LE, Mac Donald JJ, Amoyal Pensak N, Jacobs JM, Flanagan C, Jethwani K, Greer JA (2017) Mobile application to promote adherence to oral chemotherapy and symptom management: a protocol for design and development. JMIR Res Protoc 6(4):e62CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bender MS, Choi J, Arai S, Paul SM, Gonzalez P, Fukuoka Y (2014) Digital technology ownership, usage, and factors predicting downloading health apps among caucasian, filipino, korean, and latino americans: the digital link to health survey. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2(4):e43CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krebs P, Duncan DT (2015) Health app use among US mobile phone owners: a national survey. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 3(4):e101CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bauer AM, Rue T, Keppel GA, Cole AM, Baldwin LM, Katon W (2014) Use of mobile health (mHealth) tools by primary care patients in the WWAMI region Practice and Research Network (WPRN). J Am Board Fam Med 27(6):780–788CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ben-Zeev D, Davis KE, Kaiser S, Krzsos I, Drake RE (2013) Mobile technologies among people with serious mental illness: opportunities for future services. Admin Pol Ment Health 40(4):340–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Yap KY, Chia Y, Low XH, Chan A (2014) Technological preferences of aging cancer patients for delivery services and devices to solve drug-related problems in oncology. Support Care Cancer 22(10):2733–2740CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bender JL, Yue RY, To MJ, Deacken L, Jadad AR (2013) A lot of action, but not in the right direction: systematic review and content analysis of smartphone applications for the prevention, detection, and management of cancer. J Med Internet Res 15(12):e287CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Migo EM, Haynes BI, Harris L, Friedner K, Humphreys K, Kopelman MD (2015) mHealth and memory aids: levels of smartphone ownership in patients. J Ment Health 24(5):266–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schneider SM, Hess K, Gosselin T (2011) Interventions to promote adherence with oral agents. Semin Oncol Nurs 27(2):133–141CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Demonceau J, Ruppar T, Kristanto P, Hughes DA, Fargher E, Kardas P, De Geest S et al (2013) Identification and assessment of adherence-enhancing interventions in studies assessing medication adherence through electronically compiled drug dosing histories: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Drugs 73(6):545–562CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Singapore Department of Statistics. 2007. Recommendations on definition and classification of age. https://www.singstat.gov.sg/docs/default-source/default-document-library/methodologies_and_standards/standards_and_classifications/nsa.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2016
  21. 21.
    Moore S (2007) Facilitating oral chemotherapy treatment and compliance through patient/family-focused education. Cancer Nurs 30(2):112–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Anderson M. 2015. Technology device ownership: 2015. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/29/technology-device-ownership-2015/. Accessed 16 January 2016
  23. 23.
    IDC. 2015. Smartphone OS market share, 2015 Q2. http://www.idc.com/prodserv/smartphone-os-market-share.jsp. Accessed 29 March 2016
  24. 24.
    Stawarz K, Cox AL, Blandford A (2014) Don’t forget your pill! Designing effective medication reminder apps that support users’ daily routines. In: SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, Toronto, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, Hertzog C, Nair SN, Rogers WA, Sharit J (2006) Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychol Aging 21(2):333–352CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Charness N, Boot WR (2009) Aging and information technology use. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 18(5):253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association for Cancer Education 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of ScienceNational University of SingaporeSingaporeRepublic of Singapore
  2. 2.Department of PharmacyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingaporeRepublic of Singapore

Personalised recommendations