Advertisement

Journal of Cancer Education

, Volume 33, Issue 5, pp 1132–1139 | Cite as

The Quality of Patient Information Booklets for Cancer Patients—an Evaluation of Free Accessible Material in German Language

  • Christian KeinkiEmail author
  • Ivonne Rudolph
  • Dana Ruetters
  • Ulrike Kuenzel
  • Jessica Lobitz
  • Maike Schaefer
  • Hani Hanaya
  • Jutta Huebner
Article

Abstract

According to the information-seeking behaviors of patients, booklets which can be downloaded from the Internet for free are an important source of information notably for patients with cancer. This study investigated whether information booklets for patients with cancer available at German websites are in accordance with the formal and content criteria of evidence-based information. We compared and compiled both content and formal criteria by matching different national and international standards for written patient information using a merged instrument. A catalog with a total of 16 items within 4 categories (quality of the publication, quality of information, quality of information representation, and transparency) was created. Patient information booklets for the most frequent tumor types were collected from the Internet. A total of 52 different patient booklets were downloaded and assessed. Overall, no booklet fulfilled all criteria. The quality of the publications was evaluated with an average value of 1.67 while the quality of the information had a mean value of 1.45, and the quality of information presentation had a similar rating (1.39). The transparency criteria were evaluated as lowest with an average of 1.07. In summary, German booklets for cancer patients have some shortcomings concerning formal and content criteria for evidence-based patient information. The applied requirement catalog is suitable for wide use and may help in quality assurance of health information. It may be used as part of an obligatory external evaluation, which could help improving the quality of health information.

Keywords

Evidence-based health information Patient information booklets Health literacy Oncology 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE et al (2011) Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med 155:97–107. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coulter A, Ellins J (2007) Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. BMJ 335:24–27. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39246.581169.80 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dirmaier J, Härter M (2012) Partizipative Entscheidungsfindung: Patientenbeteiligung bei Behandlungsentscheidungen in der medizinischen Versorgung [Shared decision making: patient involvement in treatment decisions in medical care]. BARMER GEK Gesundheitswesen Aktuell 212–235Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoefert H-W (2011) Wandel der Patientenrolle: neue Interaktionsformen im Gesundheitswesen [change of the patient role: new forms of interaction in healthcare]. Hogrefe, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klemperer D, Lang B, Koch K et al (2010) Die, Gute praxis Gesundheitsinformation the, good practice health information. Z Für Evidenz Fortbild Qual Im Gesundheitswesen 104:66–68. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2009.12.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Böcken J, Braun B, Landmann J (2010) Gesundheitsmonitor 2010—Bürgerorientierung im Gesundheitswesen [health monitor 2010—focus on citizens healthcare]. Bertelsmann Stiftung, GüterslohGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (2012) Nationaler Krebsplan—Handlungsfelder, Ziele und Umsetzungsempfehlungen [National Cancer Plan—fields of action, objectives and implementation of recommendations]. Druckerei im Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koay K, Schofield P, Jefford M (2012) Importance of health literacy in oncology. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 8:14–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2012.01522.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Steckelberg A, Berger B, Köpke S et al (2005) Kriterien für evidenzbasierte Patienteninformationen. Z Für Ärztl Fortbild Qual Im Gesundheitswesen 99:6Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    HONcode HON Verhaltenskodex (HONcode) für medizinische und gesundheitsbezogene Webseiten [HON Code of Conduct (HONcode) for medical and health Web sites]. https://www.healthonnet.org/HONcode/German/. Accessed 9 May 2016
  11. 11.
    Aktionsforum Gesundheitsinformationssystem (afgis) e.V. afgis e. V.: Zertifizierung von Gesundheitswebsites [afgis e.V.: certification of health websites]. https://www.afgis.de/. Accessed 9 May 2016
  12. 12.
    DISCERN DISCERN-Online - Qualitätskriterien für Patienteninformationen [DISCERN Online - quality criteria for patient information]. http://www.discern.de/. Accessed 9 May 2016
  13. 13.
    Sänger S (2004) Einbeziehung von Patienten und Verbrauchern in den Prozess des Qualitätsmanagements im Gesundheitswesen am Beispiel der Qualitätsförderung medizinischer Laieninformationen im Internet [Involvement of patients and consumers in the process of quality management in health using the example of promoting quality medical laymen information online]. Thesis, Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften School of Public Health der Universität BielefeldGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liebl P, Seilacher E, Koester M-J et al (2015) What cancer patients find in the internet: the visibility of evidence-based patient information—analysis of information on German websites. Oncol Res Treat 38:212–218. doi: 10.1159/000381739 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sänger S (2006) Manual Patienteninformation: Empfehlungen zur Erstellung evidenzbasierter Patienteninformationen. ÄZQ, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Robert Koch-Institut, die Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland e.V (2013) Krebs in Deutschland 2009/2010 [Cancer in Germany 2009/2010]. Robert Koch-Institut, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keinki C, Zowalla R, Wiesner M et al (2016) Understandability of patient information booklets for patients with cancer. J Cancer Educ Off J Am Assoc Cancer Educ. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1121-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bekker HL, Winterbottom AE, Butow P et al (2013) Do personal stories make patient decision aids more effective? A critical review of theory and evidence. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 13 Suppl 2:S9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Walling AM, Maliski S, Bogorad A, Litwin MS (2004) Assessment of content completeness and accuracy of prostate cancer patient education materials. Patient Educ Couns 54:337–343. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.10.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weintraub D, Maliski SL, Fink A et al (2004) Suitability of prostate cancer education materials: applying a standardized assessment tool to currently available materials. Patient Educ Couns 55:275–280. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.10.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rees CE, Ford JE, Sheard CE (2003) Patient information leaflets for prostate cancer: which leaflets should healthcare professionals recommend? Patient Educ Couns 49:263–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Smith F, Carlsson E, Kokkinakis D et al (2014) Readability, suitability and comprehensibility in patient education materials for Swedish patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective surgery: a mixed method design. Patient Educ Couns 94:202–209. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ryan L, Logsdon MC, McGill S et al (2014) Evaluation of printed health education materials for use by low-education families. J Nurs Scholarsh Off Publ Sigma Theta Tau Int Honor Soc Nurs Sigma Theta Tau 46:218–228. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maddock C, Lewis I, Ahmad K, Sullivan R (2011) Online information needs of cancer patients and their organizations. Ecancermedicalscience 5:235. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2011.235 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hirschberg I, Seidel G, Strech D et al (2013) Evidence-based health information from the users’ perspective—a qualitative analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 13:405. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-405 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association for Cancer Education 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Keinki
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ivonne Rudolph
    • 1
  • Dana Ruetters
    • 1
  • Ulrike Kuenzel
    • 2
  • Jessica Lobitz
    • 1
  • Maike Schaefer
    • 1
  • Hani Hanaya
    • 1
  • Jutta Huebner
    • 1
  1. 1.Working Group Integrative Oncology, Dr. Senckenberg Chronomedical InstituteJ.W. Goethe UniversityFrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.Technical University BrandenburgBrandenburg an der HavelGermany

Personalised recommendations