Impact of a 2-Week Oncology Placement on Medical Students’ Perception of Cancer
- 130 Downloads
Statistics show that more than one in two people born after 1960 in the UK will develop cancer during their lifetime. However, a 2013 study found that only 36 % of UK medical schools offer dedicated clinical teaching in oncology. The aim of this study was to assess the views of medical students on five domains of oncology before and after their first clinical placement, to assess the impact, and to obtain students’ views on the oncology curriculum. A 28-item questionnaire was developed to compare responses before and after the students’ first 2-week clinical placement, and impact was measured as a positive or negative deviation from a baseline response. Students were asked about their career intentions and to evaluate their received teaching. Thirty-six (80 %) students responded to the questionnaire. The largest areas of change were identified in students’ confidence in breaking bad news, recognising red flag symptoms, and awareness of the complications of cancer management. Following their placement, 19 students said they would consider a career in oncology, 14 said they would not, and 2 were undecided. Students stated that Maggie’s Centre, a patient support facility, was the most useful learning experience. The evidence demonstrates that all students should experience oncology in a variety of settings to aid their learning. Student feedback and perception can help to guide and shape medical teaching.
KeywordsUndergraduate education Oncology Medical students
The authors thank the students, doctors, and patients involved in providing teaching and feedback.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Anonymous (1988) The Edinburgh Declaration. Lancet 322(8608):464–466Google Scholar
- 7.Jazieh AR, Henle K, Deloney LA, Savidge M, Fulper-Smith M, Nicholas R (2001) The impact of a cancer education program on the knowledge base of participating students. Journal of Cancer Education: the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education. 16(1):8–11Google Scholar
- 10.Biswal BM, Zakaria A, Baba AA, Ja’afar R (2004) Assessment of knowledge, attitude and exposure to oncology and palliative care in undergraduate medical students. The Medical Journal of Malaysia 59(1):78–83Google Scholar
- 11.Bender W, Haagedoorn E, Oldhoff J. Cancer Education in Europe according to Medical Faculty and Medical Students. Report, Second WHO/UICC Survey on Undergraduate Medical Cancer Education in Europe (1991/1992). WHO Collaborating Centre for Cancer Education; Groningen, the Netherlands 1993Google Scholar
- 15.Glaser B, Strauss A. Grounded theory: the discovery of grounded theory: de Gruyter; 1967Google Scholar
- 18.(UICC) IUAc. Cancer education for undergraduate medical students: curricula from around the world. In: Robinson E, Sherman C, Love R, eds.; Geneva, Switzerland 1994Google Scholar
- 20.Zapka JG, Luckmann R, Sulsky SI, Goins KV, Bigelow C, Mazor K, et al. (2000) Cancer control knowledge, attitudes, and perceived skills among medical students. Journal of Cancer Education: the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education 15(2):73–78Google Scholar
- 22.(HSCIC). HSCIC. NHS Workforce statistics. December 2015, Provisional Statistics. 2015.Google Scholar
- 27.Coles C, Felming W, Golding L (2003) Curricula for cancer: a practice focused approach. Cancer Research UK, LondonGoogle Scholar