Proactive and Brief Smoking Cessation Intervention for Smokers at Outdoor Smoking “Hotspots” in Hong Kong
- 135 Downloads
Increased outdoor smoking is a common phenomenon after indoor smoking bans were in place. A series of observational studies were conducted to evaluate a novel, proactive, and brief smoking cessation intervention at outdoor smoking “hotspots,” i.e., outdoor public areas where ashtrays were available and smokers clustered to smoke. The number of smokers at 26 selected hotspots were observed and counted for two consecutive days. Further observations of the smokers’ characteristics and brief smoking cessation intervention were conducted at ten of the hotspots with the greatest number of smokers. Responses of the smokers to the brief intervention, including a leaflet and brief smoking cessation advice using AWAR protocol delivered by trained smoking cessation ambassadors, were assessed. A total of 24,034 smokers were observed within 464 h, which equals 51.8 smokers per hour. Of the 5070 pedestrians observed at the ten hotspots during the intervention sessions, 1228 (24.2 %) were smokers. In the 1228 smokers who were approached during our intervention sessions, about two thirds were willing to receive the self-help leaflet on smoking cessation whereas about half received the brief smoking cessation advice. Recruiting smokers and delivering brief smoking cessation interventions at smoking hotspots are feasible and likely effective to reach large numbers of smokers. Studies to evaluate the effectiveness of using this approach for smoking cessation are warranted.
KeywordsSmoking cessatin Health promotion Hotspots Outdoor smoking area
We thank the People Acting for a Smokeless Society Ltd for providing funding for this project. We are grateful to Mr. Wu Ka Wai, Mr. Christopher Pumar L., Ms. Yip Wing Lam, and Ms. Yeung Tsz Yan for conducting the outreach interventions and providing smoking cessation advices to smokers: as well as Mr. Alex Au Yeung and Ms. Zoe Wan for their efforts in the coordination and data analysis of the project.
- 3.Borland R, Lin L, Pete D, Nick W, David H, Thompson ME, Fong GT et al (2012) Cessation assistance reported by smokers in 15 countries participating in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) policy evaluation surveys. Addiction 107(1):197–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03636.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 4.Census & Statistics Department (Hong Kong SAR government) (2016) Thematic household survey, report No. 59: pattern of smoking. Hong Kong: census & statistics departmentGoogle Scholar
- 6.Chan SS, Chee YT, Derek C, Leung DYP, Yim Wah M, Leung GM, Tai Hing L (2014) Secondhand smoke exposure and maternal action to protect children from secondhand smoke: pre- and post-smokefree legislation in Hong Kong. PLoS ONE 9(8):e105781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105781 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 9.Fiore MC, Jaén CR, Baker TB, Bailey WC, Benowitz NL, Curry SJ, Dorfman SF et al (2008) Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. MD: Department of Health and Human Services, RockvillGoogle Scholar
- 14.Kotler P, Keller KL (2005) Marketing management. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
- 16.Lee NR, Kotler P (2011) Social marketing: influencing behaviors for good. SAGE Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 19.Nagelhout GE, Willemsen MC, Gebhardt WA, van den Putte B, Hitchman SC, Crone MR, Fong GT, van der Heiden S, de Vries H (2012) Does smoke-free legislation and smoking outside bars increase feelings of stigmatization among smokers? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands survey. Health Place 18(6):1436–1440. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.08.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.World Health Organization (2012) 2012 global progress report on implementation of the WHO framework convention on tobacco control. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar