Journal of Cancer Education

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 681–689 | Cite as

Perception and Assessment of Verbal and Written Information on Sex and Relationships after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Article

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate experiences of verbal and written information about sex and relationships among men and women treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The study also aimed to investigate the demand for information and assessment of the quality of written patient information material entitled “Sex and relationships in the treatment of blood diseases.” Few studies exist that shed any light on the demand for information about sex and relationships on the part of patients with hematological diseases before, during, and after their treatment. A total of 216 patients undergoing treatment for malignant blood diseases between 2000 and 2010 participated in this study. Patients’ experiences of information about sex and relationships, and their opinions about the written patient information, were assessed using a questionnaire created specifically for this study. Most patients (81 %) had not received information about sex and relationships from a healthcare professional. Almost 90 % of men felt that verbal information was important, compared with 82 % of women. The majority also held that written information was important. These results indicate that patients, regardless of gender, age, and treatment, consider oral and written information about sex and relationships to be important and that the healthcare system should provide the information. The written patient information was considered to play an important role in creating an opening for a conversation about a sensitive topic such as sexuality, and also as a source of reference and support for the patient and his/her partner.

Keywords

Information needs Cancer Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation Sexual health Sexual relationships 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author wish to thank all the patients who were involved in this study and gave their valuable input. Many thanks to Sun Nilsson, Graphic Designer, Communications Unit at Skane University Hospital, for the help with the layout of the questionnaires, and to Helene Jacobsson, R & D Centre, Lund, for the help with the statistical analysis and layout.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there was no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Gratwohl A, Niederwieser D (2012) History of hematopoieteic stem cell transplantation: evolution and perspectives. In: Häusetmann P, Steiger J, Passweg J (eds) Transplantation dermatology. Current problems in dermatology, 43rd edn. Karger, Basel, pp 81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hatzimichael E, Tuthill M (2010) Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Stem Cells Cloning Adv Appl 3:105–117Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oguz G, Akin S, Durna Z (2014) Symptoms after hospital discharge following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Indian J Palliat Care 20(1):41–49CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Niederbacher S, Them C, Pinna A, Vittadello F, Mantovan F (2012) Patients’ quality of life after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: mixed-methods study. Eur J Cancer Care 21:548–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Humphreys CT, Tallman B, Altmaier EM, Barnette V (2007) Sexual functioning in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation: a longitudinal study. Bone Marrow Transplant 39:491–496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Meston CM, Buss DM (2007) Why humans have sex. Arch Sex Behav 36:477–507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Southard NZ, Keller J (2009) The importance of assessing sexuality: a patient perspective. Clin J Oncol Nurs 13(2):213–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    WHO (2006) Defining sexual health: report of a technical consultation on sexual health, 28–31 January 2002. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lewin B, Fugl-Meyer K, Helmius G, Lalos A, Månsson SA (1996) Sex in Sweden. On the Swedish sexual life 1996. Folkhälsouniversitetet, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gansler T, Kepner J, Willacy E, Soloe C, Rupert D, Jarblum M, Driscoll D, Orr A, Fitzgerald T, Esparza A (2010) Evolving information priorities of hematologic cancer survivors, caregivers, and other relatives. J Cancer Educ 25:302–311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    SFS: 1982:763 Hälso- och sjukvårdslagen (the Swedish Health Care Act) Available at http://www.riksdagen.se. In Swedish. Accessed 28 Oct 2014
  12. 12.
    Burke Beckjord E, Arora NK, McLaughlin W, Oakley-Girvan I, Hamilton AS, Hess BW (2008) Health-related information needs in a large and diverse sample of adult cancer survivors: implications for cancer care. J Cancer Surviv 2:179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hautamäki-Lamminen K, Lipiäinen L, Beaver K, Lehto J, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P-L (2013) Identifying cancer patients with greater need of information about sexual issues. Eur J Oncol Nurs 17:9–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Flynn KE, Barsky Reese J, Jeffery DD, Abemethy AP, Lin L, Shelby RA, Porter LS, Dombeck CB, Weinfurt KP (2012) Patient experiences with communication about sex during and after treatment for cancer. Psycho-Oncology 21:594–601CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Paul CL, Carey ML, Hall AE, Lynagh MC, Sanson-Fisher RW, Henskens FA (2011) Improving access to information and support for patients with less common cancers: hematologic cancer patients’ views about web-based approaches. J Med Internet Res 13(4):e112CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cohen MZ, Jenkins D, Holston EZ, Carlson ED (2013) Understanding health literacy in patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Oncol Nurs Forum 40(5):508–515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Iconomou G, Viha A, Koutras A, Koukourikou I, Mega V, Makatsoris T, Onyenadum A, Assimakopoulos K, Vagenakis AG, Kalofonos HP (2006) Impact of providing booklets about chemotherapy to newly presenting patients with cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Oncol 17:515–520CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rasmusson E-M, Plantin L, Elmerstig E (2013) ‘Did they think I would understand all that on my own?’ A questionnaire study about sexuality with Swedish cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12039 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Olsson C, Berglund A-L, Larsson M, Athlin E (2012) Patient’s sexuality—a neglected area of cancer nursing? Eur J Oncol Nurs 16:426–431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ançel G (2012) Information needs of cancer patients: a comparison of nurses’ and patients’ perceptions. J Cancer Educ 27(4):631–640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Güleser GN, Tasci S, Kaplan B (2012) The experience of symptoms and information needs of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. J Cancer Educ 27:46–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brace I (2008) Questionnaire design: how to plan, structure and write survey material for effective market research, 2nd edn. Kogan Page, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McGrath PD (2012) The impact on sexuality after diagnosis and treatment for a hematologic malignancy: finding from Australia. Oncol Nurs Forum 39(6):595–600CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    NØrskov K H, Scmidt M, Jarden M (2015) Patients’ experience of sexuality 1-year after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Eur J Oncol Nurs: 1–8Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Olsson C, Athlin E, Sandin-Bojö A-K, Larsson M (2013) Sexuality is not a priority when disease and treatment side effects are severe: conceptions of patients with malignant blood diseases. J Clin Nurs 22:3503–3512CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Saunamäki N, Engström M (2013) Registered nurses’ reflections on discussing sexuality with patients: responsibilities, doubts and fears. J Clin Nurs 23:531–540CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Daneback K, Månsson S-A, Ross M W, Markham C M. (2012) The Internet as a source of information about sexuality. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning 12(5). doi: 10.1080/14681811.2011.627739
  28. 28.
    Cho J, Noh H-I, Ha MH, Kang SN, J-y C, Chang YJ (2011) What kind of cancer information do Internet users need? Support Care Cancer 19:1465–1469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Moult B, Franck LS, Brady H (2004) Ensuring quality information for patients: development and preliminary validation of a new instrument to improve the quality of written health care information. Health Expect 7:165–175CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association for Cancer Education 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Health and SocietyMalmö UniversityMalmöSweden
  2. 2.Skåne University HospitalLundSweden

Personalised recommendations