Native Hawaiian Views on Biobanking
- 250 Downloads
Genomic science represents a new frontier for health research and will provide important tools for personalizing health care. Biospecimen-based research is an important mechanism for expanding the genomic research capacity, and indigenous peoples are a target of biospecimen-based research due to their relative isolation and the potential to discover rare or unique genotypes. This study explored Native Hawaiian perceptions of and expectations for biobanking. Ten discussion groups were conducted with Native Hawaiians (N = 92), who first heard a presentation on biobanking. Six themes emerged: (1) biobank governance by the Native Hawaiian community, (2) research transparency, (3) priority of Native Hawaiian health concerns, (4) leadership by Native Hawaiian scientists accountable to community, (5) re-consenting each time specimen is used, and (6) education of Native Hawaiian communities. Considered together, these findings suggest that biobanking should be guided by six principles that comprise “G.R.E.A.T. Research” (Governance, Re-consent, Education, Accountability, Transparency, Research priorities). These recommendations are being shared with biobanking facilities in Hawai‘i as they develop protocols for biobanking participation, governance, and education. These findings also inform researchers and indigenous peoples throughout the world who are working on biobanking and genomic research initiatives in their nations.
KeywordsBiobanking Research Ethics Native Hawaiian Genomics Guidelines Disparities Cancer Indigenous
This study was supported by the National Cancer Institute, Parent Grant, ‘Imi Hale Native Hawaiian Cancer Network (U54CA153459).
Conflict of Interest Disclosures
All authors have no financial disclosures.
- 2.Taniguchi N K, Taualii M, Maddock J (2012) A comparative analysis of indigenous research guidelines to inform genomic research in indigenous communities. International Indigenous Policy J 3(1) Retrieved from: http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/iipj/vol3/iss1/6
- 5.Tsosie R (2007) Cultural challenges to biotechnology: Native American genetic resources and the concept of cultural harm. J Law Med Ethics 25:296–411Google Scholar
- 8.Association of Hawaiian Civic Clubs (AHCC) (2004) Resolution urging the AHCC to support education in genetics and the ethical issues surrounding genetic studies that impact on Native Hawaiians. Adopted November 13, 2004 at the 45th Annual Convention of the AHCC, Maui HI.Google Scholar
- 10.Hawai‘i Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (2012). Population of Hawai‘i. http://dbedt.hawaii.gov/economic/databook/db2011/. Accessed 21 September 2013.
- 12.Fong M, Braun KL, Tsark J (2003) Improving Native Hawaiian health through community-based participatory research. Calif J Health Promot 1(1):136–148Google Scholar
- 15.QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo qualitative data analysis software. Version 10.Google Scholar
- 16.Pukui MK, Haertig EW, Lee CA, McDermott J (1972) Nana I ke kumu (Look to the source). Hui Hanai, HonoluluGoogle Scholar