Advertisement

Journal of Cancer Education

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 284–288 | Cite as

A Multilingual Assessment of Melanoma Information Quality on the Internet

  • Lilla Bari
  • Lajos Kemeny
  • Ferenc BariEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study aims to assess and compare melanoma information quality in Hungarian, Czech, and German languages on the Internet. We used country-specific Google search engines to retrieve the first 25 uniform resource locators (URLs) by searching the word “melanoma” in the given language. Using the automated toolbar of Health On the Net Foundation (HON), we assessed each Web site for HON certification based on the Health On the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode). Information quality was determined using a 35-point checklist created by Bichakjian et al. (J Clin Oncol 20:134–141, 2002), with the NCCN melanoma guideline as control. After excluding duplicate and link-only pages, a total of 24 Hungarian, 18 Czech, and 21 German melanoma Web sites were evaluated and rated. The amount of HON certified Web sites was the highest among the German Web pages (19 %). One of the retrieved Hungarian and none of the Czech Web sites were HON certified. We found the highest number of Web sites containing comprehensive, correct melanoma information in German language, followed by Czech and Hungarian pages. Although the majority of the Web sites lacked data about incidence, risk factors, prevention, treatment, work-up, and follow-up, at least one comprehensive, high-quality Web site was found in each language. Several Web sites contained incorrect information in each language. While a small amount of comprehensive, quality melanoma-related Web sites was found, most of the retrieved Web content lacked basic disease information, such as risk factors, prevention, and treatment. A significant number of Web sites contained malinformation. In case of melanoma, primary and secondary preventions are of especially high importance; therefore, the improvement of disease information quality available on the Internet is necessary.

Keywords

Melanoma Information quality Internet Primary and secondary prevention 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the European Union and co-funded by the European Social Fund. Project title was “Telemedicine-focused research activities on the field of mathematics, informatics and medical sciences,” with project number: TÁMOP-4.2.2.A-11/1/KONV-2012-0073.

References

  1. 1.
    Bosetti C, La Vecchia C, Naldi L, Lucchini F, Negri E, Levi F (2004) Mortality from cutaneous malignant melanoma in Europe. Has the epidemic levelled off? Melanoma Res 14:301–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Garbe C, Leiter U (2009) Melanoma epidemiology and trends. Clin Dermatol 27:3–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Forsea AM, del Marmol V, de Vries E, Bailey EE, Geller AC (2012) Melanoma incidence and mortality in Europe: new estimates, persistent disparities. Br J Dermatol 67:1124–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Risk A, Dzenowagis J (2001) Review of Internet health information quality initiatives. J Med Internet Res 3:E28PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Babamiri K, Nassab RS (2010) The availability and content analysis of melanoma information on YouTube. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:51e–52eCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bichakjian CK, Schwartz LJ, Wang TS, Hall JM, Johnson TM, Biermann JS (2002) Melanoma information on the Internet: often incomplete—a public health opportunity. J Clin Oncol 20:134–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh PM, Wight CA, Sercinoglu O, Wilasn DC, Boytsov A, Raizada MN (2007) Language preferences on websites and in Google searches for human health and food information. J Med Internet Res 9:e18PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS et al (2001) Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA 285:2612–2621PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lawrentschuk N, Abouassaly R, Hackett N, Groll R, Fleshner NE (2009) Health information quality on the Internet in urological oncology: a multilingual longitudinal evaluation. Urology 74:1058–1063CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lawrentschuk N, Sasges D, Tasevski R, Abouassaly R, Scott AM, Davis ID (2012) Oncology health information quality on the Internet: a multilingual evaluation. Ann Surg Oncol 19:706–713CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaimal AJ, Cheng YW, Bryant AS, Norton ME, Shaffer BL, Caughey AB (2008) Google obstetrics: who is educating our patients? Am J Obstet Gynecol 198:e1–e5Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Couper MP, Singer E, Levin CA, Fowler FJ Jr, Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ (2010) Use of the Internet and ratings of information sources for medical decisions: results from the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Mak 30:106S–114SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ludgate MW, Sabel MS, Fullen DR, Frohm ML, Lee JS, Couper MP, Johnson TM, Bichakjian CK (2011) Internet use and anxiety in people with melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer. Dermatol Surg 37:1252–1259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Doré DF, Chignol MC (2012) Tanning salons and skin cancer. Photochem Photobiol Sci 11:30–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Watson M, Holman DM, Fox KA, Guy GP, Seidenberg AB, Sampson BP, Sinclair C, Lazovich D (2013) Preventing skin cancer through reduction of indoor tanning: current evidence. Am J Prev Med 44:682–689PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Corbett SW, White PD, Wittlake WA (2000) Benefits of an informational videotape for emergency department patients. Am J Emerg Med 18:67–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thomas R, Deary A, Kaminiski E et al (1999) Patients' preferences for video cassette recorded information: effect of age, sex and ethnic group. Eur J Cancer Care 8:83–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fogarty LA, Curbow BA, Wingard JR et al (1999) Can 40 seconds of compassion really reduce patient anxiety? J Clin Oncol 17:371–379PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Horibe I, Satoh Y, Shiota Y, Kumagai A, Horike N, Takemori H, Uesato S, Sugie S, Obata K, Kawahara H, Nagaoka Y (2013) Induction of melanogenesis by 4′–O-methylated flavonoids in B16F10 melanoma cells. J Nat Med 67:705–710CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ye Y, Wang H, Chu JH, Chou GX, Yu ZL (2011) Activation of p38 MAPK pathway contributes to the melanogenic property of apigenin in B16 cells. Exp Dermatol 20:755–757CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marble N, Loescher LJ, Lim KH, Hiscox H (2010) Use of technology for educating melanoma patients. J Cancer Educ 25:445–450CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SzegedSzegedHungary
  2. 2.Department of Medical Physics and Informatics, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SzegedSzegedHungary

Personalised recommendations