Journal of Cancer Education

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 44–49 | Cite as

Knowledge and Prevention Practices Before Breast Cancer Diagnosis in a Cross-Sectional Study Among Survivors: Impact on Patients’ Involvement in the Decision Making Process

  • Emanuela Taioli
  • Gail R. Joseph
  • Linda Robertson
  • Stacy Eckstein
  • Camille Ragin


Disparities exist in breast cancer knowledge and education, which tend to influence symptom interpretation and decision to seek screening/care. The present project describes a cohort of women’s experiences, knowledge, and health behavior prior to and after a diagnosis of breast cancer. It also studies how knowledge and demographic factors are associated with level of involvement participants had in the treatment of their breast cancer. Women >18 years who have been diagnosed and treated for breast cancer within 10 years were recruited in Pittsburgh, PA, through the Healthy People Cohort Registry, a database of volunteers from the community, and Brooklyn, NY, through the American Cancer Society breast cancer survivor database. Subsequent to institutional ethics approval, a questionnaire was administered by mail and through an electronic interactive format. The study included 124 breast cancer survivors, one-quarter of whom were of African ancestry. Roughly half of the women indicated that their overall knowledge of breast cancer was limited before diagnosis; no significant association between overall knowledge before diagnosis and stage at diagnosis or an active role of the patient in treatment choices was observed. Two-third of the women reported using personal research on internet, books, and other media to increase knowledge on breast cancer after diagnosis; the improvement of knowledge was associated with an active role in therapy choice. White women’s self report of breast cancer knowledge prior to diagnosis was higher than that of women of African origin (p = 0.03); the latter experienced more delays in getting results about the diagnosis (p = 0.002), in starting treatment (p = 0.03), and in having treatment available at local facilities (p = 0.007) than white women. White women were more likely to improve their knowledge through their own research (p = 0.08) and through the contribution of their physician (p = 0.06) than women of African origin.There is still a need for addressing breast cancer knowledge among black women, and improvement in physician emotional support and in their contribution to the patient’s knowledge is necessary. These efforts may have a positive impact on breast cancer knowledge among black women in the US.


Cancer prevention Cancer education Mammography Cancer therapy African ancestry 


  1. 1.
    Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M et al (2007) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2004. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clark CR, Baril N, Kunicki M, Johnson N, Soukup J, Ferguson K, Lipsitz S, Bigby J (2009) Addressing social determinants of health to improve access to early breast cancer detection: results of the Boston REACH 2010 Breast and Cervical Cancer Coalition Women’s Health Demonstration Project. J Womens Health 18:677–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ajzen I (1988) Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Dorsey, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gullate M (2006) The influence of spirituality and religiosity on breast cancer screening delay in African-American women: application of the Theory of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior (TRA/TPB). ABNF J 17:89–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Achat H, Close G, Taylor R (2005) Who has regular mammograms? Effects of knowledge, beliefs, socioeconomic status, and health-related factors. Prev Med 41:312–320CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Curtis E, Quale C, Haggstrom D, Smith-Bindman R (2008) Racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer survival: how much is explained by screening, tumor severity, biology, treatment, comorbidities, and demographics? Cancer 112:171–180PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spittler CA, Pallikathayil L, Bott M (2012) Exploration of how women make treatment decisions after a breast cancer diagnosis. Oncol Nurs Forum 39:E425–E433CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nissen MJ, Tsai ML, Blaes AH, Swenson KK (2012) Breast and colorectal cancer survivors’ knowledge about their diagnosis and treatment. J Cancer Surviv 6:20–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Greene J, Hibbard JH (2012) Why does patient activation matter? An examination of the relationships between patient activation and health-related outcomes. J Gen Intern Med 27:520–526PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen JY, Diamant AL, Thind A, Maly RC (2008) Determinants of breast cancer knowledge among newly diagnosed, low-income, medically underserved women with breast cancer. Cancer 112:1153–1161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maly RC, Leake B, Silliman RA (2004) Breast cancer treatment in older women: impact of the patient–physician interaction. J Am Geriatr Soc 52:1138–1145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Brien MA, Ellis PM, Whelan TJ, Charles C, Gafni A, Lovrics P, Mukherjee SD, Hodgson N, 2011. Physician-related facilitators and barriers to patient involvement in treatment decision making in early stage breast cancer: perspectives of physicians and patients. Health Expect 1–12, Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emanuela Taioli
    • 1
  • Gail R. Joseph
    • 2
  • Linda Robertson
    • 2
  • Stacy Eckstein
    • 3
  • Camille Ragin
    • 4
  1. 1.EpidemiologyHofstra North Shore-LIJ School of MedicineGreat NeckUSA
  2. 2.University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Division of Hematology/OncologyUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer InstitutePittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Human Engineering Research LaboratoriesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Health and Rehabilitation SciencePittsburghUSA
  4. 4.Cancer Prevention and ControlFox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health SystemPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations