Journal of Cancer Education

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 541–546 | Cite as

Scholastic Activity Among Radiation Oncology Residents at US Academic Institutions: a Benchmark Analysis

  • Shushan Rana
  • Emma B. Holliday
  • Reshma Jagsi
  • Lynn D. Wilson
  • Mehee Choi
  • Charles R. ThomasJr
  • Clifton D. Fuller
Article

Abstract

Objective assessment of academic productivity is useful for residency programs. This study aims to analyze the number of publications and Hirsch index (h index) among radiation oncology residents. Names of residents during the 2010 academic year (n = 607) were collected from the Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology 2010 Directory. Number of publications and h index from Jan. 1996 to Feb. 2012 were collected from a bibliographic database (SCOPUS, Elsevier, BV, Amsterdam, NL). Analysis of h index included stratification by gender, residency size, and postresidency private practice or academic employment. Six hundred seven residents, 67 % men and 33 % women, had an overall mean h index of 2.5 ± 3.2. Graduates in academia exhibited a higher mean h index (3.9 ± 0.30) compared to private practice (2.0 ± 0.25; p < 0.01). Gender, residency size, and post-graduate position remained correlates of h index (all p ≤ 0.01). Women had lower mean h index and number of publications than men (2.1 ± 2.3 vs 2.7 ± 3.5, 4.5 ± 5.3 vs 6.2 ± 8.0, respectively; both p < 0.05). However, when stratified by current position (resident, private practice, or academic), there were no significant differences in h index by gender. The mean ± SD h indices for institutions comprising the top 10 % ranged 4.17 ± 3.2–5.25 ± 5.4 while the bottom 10 % ranged 0.0 ± 0.0–0.75 ± 1.4. The h index is a useful metric to assess residents' early dedication to scholarly endeavors. Female radiation oncology residents had fewer total publications and slightly lower h indices, warranting accessible research avenues and environments for future female physician–scientists. The application of the h index provides a reference for medical students, residents, residency program directors, and many others to gauge academic performance and establish appropriate benchmarks.

Keywords

Bibliometrics Academic productivity Mentorship Training Publications H index Radiation oncology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Portions of these data were presented in abstract form at the 2012 meeting of the American Society for Radiation Oncology in Boston, MA, on October 29, 2012.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Institutional Board Review Statement

IRB approval was not required for this study due to the publically available nature of the data analyzed.

References

  1. 1.
    Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:16569–16572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee J, Kraus KL, Couldwell WT (2009) Use of the h index in neurosurgery. J Neurosurg 111(2):387–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rad AE, Brinjikji W, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF (2010) The H-index in academic radiology. Acad Radiol 17(7):817–821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Poynard T, Thabut D, Jabre P, Munteanu M, Ratziu V, Benhamou Y et al (2011) Ranking hepatologists: which Hirsch's h-index to prevent the “e-crise de foi-e”? Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 35(5):375–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mullins ME (2010) Has the time come for bibliometrics and the h-index in academic radiology? Acad Radiol 17(7):815–816PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kulasegarah J, Fenton JE (2010) Comparison of the h index with standard bibliometric indicators to rank influential otolaryngologists in Europe and North America. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267(3):455–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hunt GE, Cleary M, Walter G (2010) Psychiatry and the Hirsch h-index: the relationship between journal impact factors and accrued citations. Harv Rev Psychiatry 18(4):207–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Healy NA, Glynn RW, Scutaru C, Groneberg D, Kerin MJ, Sweeney KJ (2011) The h index and the identification of global benchmarks for breast cancer research output. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127(3):845–851PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spearman CM, Quigley MJ, Quigley MR, Wilberger JE (2010) Survey of the h index for all of academic neurosurgery: another power-law phenomenon? J Neurosurg 113(5):929–933PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Benway BM, Kalidas P, Cabello JM, Bhayani SB (2009) Does citation analysis reveal association between h-index and academic rank in urology? Urology 74(1):30–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aoun SG, Bendok BR, Rahme RJ, Dacey RG, Batjer HH (2013) Standardizing the evaluation of scientific and academic performance in neurosurgery—critical review of the “h” index and its variants. World Neurosurg (in press)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Quigley MR, Holliday EB, Fuller CD, Choi M, Thomas CR Jr (2012) Distribution of the h-index in radiation oncology conforms to a variation of power law: implications for assessing academic productivity. J Cancer Educ 27(3):463–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Choi M, Fuller CD, Thomas CR Jr (2009) Estimation of citation-based scholarly activity among radiation oncology faculty at domestic residency-training institutions: 1996–2007. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74(1):172–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    SCOPUS. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier BV; 2008. https://www.scopus.com/home.url. Last accessed April 1, 2013
  15. 15.
    Google Scholar. http://scholar.google.com. Last accessed April 1, 2013
  16. 16.
    Research in International Management Product & Services for Academics http://www.harzing.com/. Last accessed April 1, 2013
  17. 17.
    Thomson Reuters Web of Science. http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/science_products/a-z/web_of_science/ . Last accessed April 1, 2013
  18. 18.
    Morgan PB, Sopka DM, Kathpal M, Haynes JC, Lally BE, Li L (2009) First author research productivity of United States radiation oncology residents: 2002–2007. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74(5):1567–1572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rezek I, McDonald RJ, Kallmes DF (2012) Pre-residency publication rate strongly predicts future academic radiology potential. Acad Radiol 19:632–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    ACGME (2013) Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education program requirements for graduate medical education in radiation oncology. http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/downloads/RRC_progReq/430_radiation_oncology_01012009.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2013
  21. 21.
    Holden C (2001) General contentment masks gender gap in the first AAAS salary and job survey. Science 294(5541):396–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Guarin-Neito E, Krugman SD (2010) Gender disparity in women's health training at a family medicine residency program. Fam Med 42(2):100–104Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhuge Y, Kaufman J, Simeone DM, Chen H, Velazquez OC (2011) Is there still a glass ceiling for women in academic surgery? Ann Surg 253(4):637–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sidhu R, Rajashekhar P, Lavin VL, Parry J, Attwood J, Holdcroft A et al (2009) The gender imbalance in academic medicine: a study of female authorship in the United Kingdom. J R Soc Med 102(8):337–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shushan Rana
    • 1
  • Emma B. Holliday
    • 2
  • Reshma Jagsi
    • 3
  • Lynn D. Wilson
    • 4
  • Mehee Choi
    • 5
  • Charles R. ThomasJr
    • 6
  • Clifton D. Fuller
    • 2
    • 6
  1. 1.The University of Texas Health Science Center San AntonioSan AntonioUSA
  2. 2.The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA
  3. 3.The University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  4. 4.Yale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  5. 5.Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoUSA
  6. 6.Oregon Health and Science Center, Knight Cancer InstitutePortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations