Research Recruitment Using Facebook Advertising: Big Potential, Big Challenges
- 4.1k Downloads
To our knowledge, ours is the first study to report on Facebook advertising as an exclusive mechanism for recruiting women ages 35–49 years residing in the USA into a health-related research study. We directed our survey to women ages 35–49 years who resided in the USA exclusively using three Facebook advertisements. Women were then redirected to our survey site. There were 20,568,960 women on Facebook that met the eligibility criteria. The three ads resulted in 899,998 impressions with a reach of 374,225 women. Of the women reached, 280 women (0.075 %) clicked the ad. Of the women who clicked the ad, nine women (3.2 %) proceeded past the introductory page. Social networking, and in particular Facebook, is an innovative venue for recruiting participants for research studies. Challenges include developing an ad to foster interest without biasing the sample, and motivating women who click the ad to complete the survey. There is still much to learn about this potential method of recruitment.
KeywordsResearch recruitment Facebook Advertising
This project was funded by a University of Missouri Research Council grant [URC 11–009 Kapp]. The funding source had no involvement in data collection or interpretation. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the University of Missouri. We are grateful to the women who participated in this study and shared their views. We thank Robert Blake, MD from the University of Missouri for his helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
- 1.Fox S and Jones S (2009) The social life of health information. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project [updated 2009 Jun 11; cited 2011 Apr 5]. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2009/PIP_Health_2009.pdf
- 2.Madden M and Zickuhr K (2011) 65 % of online adults use social networking sites. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center [updated 2011 Aug 26; cited 2012 Feb 23]. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2011/PIP-SNS-Update-2011.pdf
- 3.Mychasiuk R, Benzies K (2011) Facebook: an effective tool for participant retention in longitudinal research. Child Care Health DevGoogle Scholar
- 8.Abdesslem FB, Parris I, and Henderson T (2010) Mobile experience sampling: reaching the parts of Facebook other methods cannot reach. Presented at: Privacy and usability methods pow-wow (PUMP); Sept 6, 2010; Dundee, UK. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory; [updated 2010 Sep 6; cited 2012 Jun 11]. Available from: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~fb375/publications/Ben-Abdesslem.PUMP10.pdf
- 12.Hoy MG, Milne G (2010) Gender differences in privacy-related measures for young adult Facebook users. J Interact Advert 10(2):28–45Google Scholar
- 13.Brickman-Bhutta C (2009) Not by the book: Facebook as sampling frame. University Park, PA: Association of Religion Data Archives [updated 2009 Oct 27; cited 2012 Jun 11]. Available from: www.thearda.com/workingpapers/download/Not%20by%20the%20Book%20-%20Bhutta.doc
- 20.de Vries G (2012) Online display ads: the brand awareness black hole. Forbes.com LLC [updated 2012 May 7; cited 2012 Jun 11]. Available from: http://www.forbes.com/sites/ciocentral/2012/05/07/online-display-ads-the-brand-awareness-black-hole/