Pap Screening Goals and Perceptions of Pain among Black, Latina, and Arab Women: Steps Toward Breaking down Psychological Barriers
Understanding women’s psychological barriers to getting Papanicolaou (Pap) screening has potential to impact cancer disparities. This study examined pain perceptions of Pap testing among black, Latina, and Arab women and goal setting to receive Pap tests. Data on 420 women, in a longitudinal study, were analyzed using Chi-square tests of differences and generalized linear mixed models. At baseline, 30.3 % of black and 35.5 % of Latina women perceived Pap tests to be very painful compared to 24.2 % of Arab women. Perceptions of pain influenced goal settings, such as scheduling a first ever Pap test (odds ratio = 0.58, 95 % confidence interval 0.14–0.94). Immediately following the intervention, women’s perception that Pap tests are very painful significantly declined (P value <0.001) with Arab and black women registering the greatest improvements (20.3 and 17.3 % reduction, respectively, compared to 8.4 % for Latina). Having the perception that the Pap test is very painful significantly reduces the likelihood of black, Latina, and Arab women setting the goal to schedule their first ever Pap test. Latina women are the least likely to improve their perception that the Pap test is very painful, though national statistics show they have the highest rates of morbidity and mortality from cervical cancer. These findings are instructive for designing tailored interventions to break down psychological barriers to Pap screening among underserved women.
KeywordsCervical cancer screening Pap test Perceptions of pain Cancer disparities Race Ethnicity
- 3.American Cancer Society (2011). Cancer Facts & Figures 2011. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-029771.pdf
- 4.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2008. Cancer screening and treatment in women: recent findings. http://www.ahrq.gov/research/cancerwom.htm#intro
- 5.Hakama M, Miller AB, Day NE (eds) (1986) Screening for cancer of the uterine cervix: from the IARC working group on cervical cancer screening and the UICC project group on the evaluation of screening programmes for cancer. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 8.Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). Cancer Screening—United States, 2010. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. December 2012, Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6103a1.htm?s_cid=mm6103a1_w
- 10.National Cancer Institute (2009). SEER cancer statistics review 1975–2007. Bethesda, MD Retrieved from http://seer.cancer.gov
- 12.de la Cruz GP, Brittingham A. The Arab population: census 2000 brief. December 2003, US Census BureauGoogle Scholar
- 13.American Community Survey. 2008. Selected population characteristics & interactive map. Demographics data from the Arab American Institute. December 2012, Retrieved from http://www.aaiusa.org/pages/demographics/
- 16.Michigan Department of Community Health and Michigan Public Health Institute. Special cancer behavioral risk factor survey, 2008. www.michigancancer.org/PDFs/MCCReports/SCBRFS_2008-042910.pdf.
- 21.Skrondal A, Rabe-Hesketh S (2009) Prediction in multilevel generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 172:659–687Google Scholar
- 23.Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Newbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
- 24.SAS Institute Inc., 2008. SAS/STAT® 9.2 User's guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar