“5 Mins of Uncomfyness Is Better than Dealing with Cancer 4 a Lifetime”: an Exploratory Qualitative Analysis of Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening Dialogue on Twitter
- 797 Downloads
Twitter.com is a “micro-blogging” website. Although Twitter use is growing rapidly, little is known about health behavior discussions on this site, even though a majority of messages are publicly available. We retrieved publicly available Twitter messages during a 5-week period in early 2012, searching separately for the terms “Pap smear” and “mammogram.” We used content analysis to code each 140-character message, generating a separate coding framework for each cancer screening term and calculating the frequencies of comments. Using the brief account description, we also coded the author as individual, organization, or news media outlet. There were 203 Pap smear and 271 mammogram messages coded, over three fourths of which were from individual accounts. Overall, 22 % of Pap smear messages and 25 % of mammogram messages discussed personal experiences, including attending appointments, negative sentiment about the procedure, and results. Other messages from both individuals and organizations (8 % Pap smear, 18 % mammogram) promoted screening. About one quarter of the messages expressed personal experiences with cancer screening. This demonstrates that Twitter can be a rich source of information and could be used to design new health-related interventions.
KeywordsOnline social media Pap smear Mammogram
All authors have fulfilled the criteria for authorship established by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and approved submission of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
None of the authors had conflicts of interest. Dr. Sarkar was supported by a AHRQ career development award K08 HS017594. None of the funders had any role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
- 2.The social skinny (2012) 99 New Social Media Stats for 2012, Available at http://thesocialskinny.com/99-new-social-media-stats-for-2012/ Accessed 29 May 2012
- 4.Pew Internet & American Life Project (2010) Mobile health 2010. Available from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Mobile-Health-2010.aspx. Accessed 23 April 2012
- 7.Harlow S, Johnson TJ (2011) Overthrowing the protest paradigm? How The New York Times, Global Voices and Twitter covered the Egyptian Revolution. Int J Comm 5:1359–1374Google Scholar
- 10.Moore RJ (2009) Twitter data analysis: an investor’s perspective. Available from http://techcrunch.com/2009/10/05/twitter-data-analysis-an-investors-perspective-2/. Accessed 29 April 2012
- 11.eMarketer (2011) U.S. Digital media usage: a snapshot of 2012Google Scholar
- 12.Pew Internet & American Life Project (2012) Twitter use 2012: Pew Research Center, Available at http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Twitter-Use-2012.aspx. Accessed 9 July 2012
- 13.eMarketer (2012) Facebook’s US user growth slows but Twitter sees double-digit gainsGoogle Scholar
- 14.United States Preventive Services Task Force. Recommendations for adults, Available at http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/adultrec.htm. Accessed 9 July 2012