Journal of Cancer Education

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 764–769 | Cite as

Physician Behaviors Surrounding the Implementation of Decision and Communication Aids in a Breast Cancer Clinic: a Qualitative Analysis of Staff Intern Perceptions

Article

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine how physician behavior facilitated or impeded our implementation of decision and communication aids in a breast cancer clinic. Staff interns provided decision and communication aids to patients and wrote up case notes for each patient they served. We used grounded theory to code our staff interns’ case notes. We then identified barriers and facilitators to our program’s implementation from each category we generated in the coding. Facilitators included physicians reading patient questions and then bringing the staff interns to the consultation. Barriers included physicians forgetting to bring the staff interns to the appointments and discouraging interns from speaking during the consultation. Physicians vary in their cooperation with our program. Our next steps will be to inquire directly with physicians about how to adapt our program design. We will also seek to position the staff interns as mentees to increase physician commitment to our program.

Keywords

Implementation Shared decision making Decision aids Communication aids 

References

  1. 1.
    Belkora JK (1997) Mindful collaboration: prospect mapping as an action research approach to planning for medical consultations. Stanford University, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kinnersley P, Edwards A, Hood K, Cadbury N, Ryan R, Prout H, Owen D, Macbeth F, Butow P, Butler C (2007) Interventions before consultations for helping patients address their information needs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD004565. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004565.pub2.
  3. 3.
    O’Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D, Barry M, Col NF, Eden KB, Entwistle VA et al (2009) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD001431. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2.
  4. 4.
    Pitkethly M, Macgillivray S, Ryan R (2008) Recordings or summaries of consultations for people with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD001539. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001539.pub2.
  5. 5.
    Glasgow RE, McKay HG, Piette JD, Reynolds KD (2001) The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? Patient Educ Couns 44(2):119–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glasgow RE, Shawn B, Tom V (2007) RE-AIM. http://www.re-aim.org/index.html. Accessed June 12 2012.
  7. 7.
    Belkora JK, Teng A, Volz S, Loth MK, Esserman LJ (2011) Expanding the reach of decision and communication aids in a breast care center: a quality improvement study. Patient Educ Couns 83(2):234–239. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.003 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Belkora J, Loth M, Chen D, Chen J, Volz S, Esserman L (2008) Monitoring the implementation of Consultation Planning, Recording, and Summarizing in a breast care center. Patient Educ Couns 73(3):536–543. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.037 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sepucha KR, Belkora JK, Mutchnick S, Esserman LJ (2002) Consultation planning to help breast cancer patients prepare for medical consultations: effect on communication and satisfaction for patients and physicians. J Clin Oncol 20(11):2695–2700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sepucha KR, Belkora JK, Tripathy D, Esserman LJ (2000) Building bridges between physicians and patients: results of a pilot study examining new tools for collaborative decision making in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 18(6):1230–1238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Belkora JK, Loth MK, Volz S, Rugo HS (2009) Implementing decision and communication aids to facilitate patient-centered care in breast cancer: a case study. Patient Educ Couns 77(3):360–368. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.012 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Strauss AL (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dimoska A, Butow PN, Lynch J, Hovey E, Agar M, Beale P, Tattersall MH (2011) Implementing patient question-prompt lists into routine cancer care. Patient Educ Couns. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.020
  14. 14.
    Price EL, Perez-Stable EJ, Nickleach D, Lopez M, Karliner LS (2011) Interpreter perspectives of in-person, telephonic, and videoconferencing medical interpretation in clinical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.08.006
  15. 15.
    Hirsch O, Keller H, Krones T, Donner-Banzhoff N (2012) arriba-lib: evaluation of an electronic library of decision aids in primary care physicians. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 12(1):48. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-12-48 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Graham ID, Logan J, Bennett CL, Presseau J, O'Connor AM, Mitchell SL, Tetroe JM, Cranney A, Hebert P, Aaron SD (2007) Physicians' intentions and use of three patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 7:20. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-7-20 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Pass
    • 1
  • S. Volz
    • 1
  • A. Teng
    • 1
  • L. Esserman
    • 1
  • J. Belkora
    • 1
  1. 1.Philip R. Lee Institute For Health Policy StudiesUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations