Quality and Readability of Information Materials for People with Brain Tumours and Their Families
- 261 Downloads
Written information is commonly used to inform patients about their disease and treatment but must be evidence-based and understandable to be useful. This study assessed the quality of the content and the readability of information brochures for people affected by brain tumours. We randomly selected 18 publicly available brochures. Brochures were assessed by criteria to assess the quality of content using the DISCERN instrument. Readability was tested using three commonly used formulas, which yield the reading grade level required to comprehend the brochure (sixth grade level recommended). The mean overall DISCERN score was 3.17 out of a maximum of 5 (moderate quality); only one achieved a rating greater than 4 (high quality). Only one brochure met the sixth grade readability criteria. Although brochures may have accurate content, few satisfied all of the recommended criteria to evaluate their content. Existing brochures need to be critically reviewed and simplified and consumer-focused brochures, produced.
KeywordsPatient information Patient education Brain tumours Readability Information Cancer
The authors would like to thank Karen Remm, Angela Williamson and Ashley Walton for their assistance with this study.
- 17.McLaughlin GH (1969) SMOG grading—a new readability formula. J Read 12:639–646Google Scholar
- 18.Fry E (1968) A readability formula that saves time. J Read 11(513–6):575–578Google Scholar
- 20.Flesch RF (1979) How to write plain english: a book for lawyers and consumers. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 22.Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D (1998) Informing patients: an assessment of the quality of patient information materials. King's Fund, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 25.Chen JY, Hovey E, Rosenthal M, Livingstone A, Simes J. COGNO patterns of care study in neuro-oncology in Australia, 2011, Co-operative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology, SydneyGoogle Scholar
- 26.Langbecker D, Janda M, Yates P (2012) Development and piloting of a brain tumour-specific question prompt list. Eur J Canc Care. 21(4):517–526Google Scholar