Advertisement

Journal of Cancer Education

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 243–249 | Cite as

Developing Partnerships and Recruiting Dyads for a Prostate Cancer Informed Decision Making Program: Lessons Learned From a Community-Academic-Clinical Team

  • Daniela B. Friedman
  • Kim M. Johnson
  • Otis L. Owens
  • Tracey L. Thomas
  • DeLisa S. Dawkins
  • Lucy Gansauer
  • Sharon Bartelt
  • Nancy M. Waddell
  • Pastor J. Talley
  • James D. BeardenIII
  • James R. Hébert
Article

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PrCA) is the most commonly diagnosed non-skin cancer among men. PrCA mortality in African-American (AA) men in South Carolina is ~50% higher than for AAs in the U.S as a whole. AA men also have low rates of participation in cancer research. This paper describes partnership development and recruitment efforts of a Community-Academic-Clinical research team for a PrCA education intervention with AA men and women that was designed to address the discordance between high rates of PrCA mortality and limited participation in cancer research. Guided by Vesey’s framework on recruitment and retention of minority groups in research, recruitment strategies were selected and implemented following multiple brainstorming sessions with partners having established community relationships. Based on findings from these sessions culturally appropriate strategies are recommended for recruiting AA men and women for PrCA education research. Community-based research recruitment challenges and lessons learned are presented.

Keywords

African-American men and women Community-based participatory research Research partnerships Recruitment Cancer communication Multi-media 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Community Networks Program Centers U54 CA153461-01 (PI: Hébert; Project Leader: Friedman). Partially supported by an Established Investigator Award in Cancer Prevention and Control from the Cancer Training Branch of the NCI to J.R. Hébert (K05 CA136975). We acknowledge the community advisory panel, Spartanburg Regional Gibbs Cancer Center, NCI Community Clinical Oncology Program and NCI Community Cancer Centers Program partners, Dawn Skaggs, Bruce Grant, RN, and study participants.

References

  1. 1.
    Drake BE, Keane TE, Mosley CM et al (2006) Prostate cancer disparities in South Carolina: early detection, special programs, and descriptive epidemiology. J S C Med Assoc 102(7):241–249PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barry MJ (2009) Screening for prostate cancer–the controversy that refuses to die. N Engl J Med 360(13):1351–1354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brooks D, Saslow D, Shah M, Brawley OW (2011) Cancer screening in the United States, 2011: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 61(1):8–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Draisma G, Etzioni R, Tsodikov A et al (2009) Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context. J Natl Cancer Inst 101(6):374–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chou R, Croswell JM, Dana T et al (2011) Screening for prostate cancer: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 155(11):762–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    UsTOO International Prostate Cancer Education & Support. Special News for African American Men. 2011; http://www.ustoo.org/Special_News.asp. Accessed November 16, 2011
  7. 7.
    National Medical Association. (2011) Statement on Prostate Specific Antigen National Medical Association’s Urology Section’s Experts. http://www.prlog.org/11725950-statement-on-prostate-specific-antigen-national-medical-associations-urology-sections-experts.html. Accessed November 16, 2011
  8. 8.
    Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL 3rd et al (2009) Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med 360(13):1310–1319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ et al (2009) Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med 360(13):1320–1328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bailey JM, Bieniasz ME, Kmak D, Brenner DE, Ruffin MT (2004) Recruitment and retention of economically underserved women to a cervical cancer prevention trial. Appl Nurs Res 17(1):55–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baquet CR, Ellison GL, Mishra SI (2008) Analysis of Maryland cancer patient participation in national cancer institute-supported cancer treatment clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 26(20):3380–3386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Freedman LS, Simon R, Foulkes MA et al (1995) Inclusion of women and minorities in clinical trials and the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993–the perspective of NIH clinical trialists. Control Clin Trials 16(5):277–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moinpour CM, Atkinson JO, Thomas SM et al (2000) Minority recruitment in the prostate cancer prevention trial. Ann Epidemiol 10(8 Suppl):S85–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Comis RL, Crowley J, Unger J, et al (2006) Baseline study of patient accrual onto publicly sponsored U.S. Cancer Clinical Trials: an analysis conducted for the global access project of the National Patient Advocate Foundation. http://www.npaf.org/images/pdf/gap/sept_2006/cccg.pdf. Accessed April 21, 2009
  15. 15.
    Cook ED, Moody-Thomas S, Anderson KB et al (2005) Minority recruitment to the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT). Clinical trials (London, England) 2(5):436–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ford JG, Howerton MW, Bolen S, et al (2005) Knowledge and access to information on recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) (122):1–11Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Adams-Campbell LL, Ahaghotu C, Gaskins M et al (2004) Enrollment of African Americans onto clinical treatment trials: study design barriers. J Clin Oncol 22(4):730–734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gross CP, Filardo G, Mayne ST, Krumholz HM (2005) The impact of socioeconomic status and race on trial participation for older women with breast cancer. Cancer 103(3):483–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sateren WB, Trimble EL, Abrams J et al (2002) How sociodemographics, presence of oncology specialists, and hospital cancer programs affect accrual to cancer treatment trials. J Clin Oncol 20(8):2109–2117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Trauth JM, Jernigan JC, Siminoff LA, Musa D, Neal-Ferguson D, Weissfeld J (2005) Factors affecting older african american women’s decisions to join the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial. J Clin Oncol 23(34):8730–8738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Howerton MW, Gibbons MC, Baffi CR et al (2007) Provider roles in the recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials. Cancer 109(3):465–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Joseph G, Dohan D (2009) Recruiting minorities where they receive care: Institutional barriers to cancer clinical trials recruitment in a safety-net hospital. Contemp Clin Trials 30(6):552–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Giuliano AR, Mokuau N, Hughes C et al (2000) Participation of minorities in cancer research: the influence of structural, cultural, and linguistic factors. Ann Epidemiol 10(8 Suppl):S22–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Friedman DB, Corwin SJ, Rose ID, Dominick GM (2009) Prostate cancer communication strategies recommended by older African-American men in South Carolina: a qualitative analysis. J Cancer Educ 24(3):204–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hughes GD, Sellers DB, Fraser L Jr, Teague R, Knight B (2007) Prostate cancer community collaboration and partnership: education, awareness, recruitment, and outreach to southern African-American males. J Cult Divers 14(2):68–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Whitt-Glover MC, Kumanyika SK (2009) Systematic review of interventions to increase physical activity and physical fitness in African-Americans. Am J Health Promot 23(6):S33–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Napoles AM, Chadiha LA (2011) Advancing the science of recruitment and retention of ethnically diverse populations. Gerontologist 51(Suppl 1):S142–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB (2001) Community-based participatory research: policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research. Educ Health (Abingdon) 14(2):182–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hebert JR, Daguise VG, Hurley DM et al (2009) Mapping cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios to illustrate racial and gender disparities in a high-risk population. Cancer 115(11):2539–2552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chan EC, McFall SL, Byrd TL et al (2011) A community-based intervention to promote informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among Hispanic American men changed knowledge and role preferences: a cluster RCT. Patient Educ Couns 84(2):e44–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vesey GA (2002) A successful strategy for recruitment and retention of Black elders in applied research. Afr Am Res Perspect 8(2):40–56Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    National Coalition of Oncology Nurse Navigators. (2010) Oncology Nurse Navigation and Patient Navigation Defined. http://old.nconn.org/pdf/NCONN_PressRelease_8_10.pdf. Accessed November 30, 2011
  33. 33.
    Case MA (2011) Oncology nurse navigator. Clin J Oncol Nurs 15(1):33–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Friedman DB, Hooker SP, Wilcox S, Burroughs EL, Rheaume CE. African American men’s perspectives on promoting physical activity: “We’re not that difficult to figure out!” J Health Commun. In pressGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Thomson MD, Hoffman-Goetz L (2011) Challenges of recruiting ESL immigrants into cancer education studies: reflections from practice notes. J Cancer Educ 26(1):170–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Friedman DB, Laditka JN, Hunter R et al (2009) Getting the message out about cognitive health: a cross-cultural comparison of older adults’ media awareness and communication needs on how to maintain a healthy brain. Gerontologist 49(Suppl 1):S50–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nanton V, Dale J (2011) ‘It don’t make sense to worry too much’: the experience of prostate cancer in African-Caribbean men in the UK. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 20(1):62–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sadler GR, Ko CM, Malcarne VL, Banthia R, Gutierrez I, Varni JW (2007) Costs of recruiting couples to a clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials 28(4):423–432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Voils CI, Yancy WS Jr, Weinberger M et al (2011) The trials and tribulations of enrolling couples in a randomized, controlled trial: a self-management program for hyperlipidemia as a model. Patient Educ Couns 84(1):33–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniela B. Friedman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kim M. Johnson
    • 3
  • Otis L. Owens
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tracey L. Thomas
    • 1
    • 2
  • DeLisa S. Dawkins
    • 3
  • Lucy Gansauer
    • 3
  • Sharon Bartelt
    • 3
  • Nancy M. Waddell
    • 3
  • Pastor J. Talley
    • 3
  • James D. BeardenIII
    • 3
  • James R. Hébert
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Arnold School of Public Health, Department of Health Promotion, Education, and BehaviorUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control ProgramUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program, Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System, Gibbs Cancer CenterSpartanburgUSA
  4. 4.Arnold School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations