Implementing Cancer Prevention into Clinical Practice
- 232 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
Cancer prevention has been associated with decreased rates of cancer incidence and increased survival. Cancer prevention, however, can have a greater impact if barriers to implementing cancer prevention into practice are removed and opportunities are both fostered and seized. The purpose of this article is to identify barriers and opportunities to cancer prevention in clinical practice and provide recommendations for the future. A multidisciplinary team participated in “The Future Directions Cancer Prevention and Control: Workforce Implications for Training, Practice and Policy” workshop on October 17–18, 2009 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, TX. During the meeting, the team discussed barriers and opportunities for the implementation of cancer prevention into clinical practice. Further data were collected from peer-reviewed journals and published government and cancer agencies reports. Several issues were identified: (1) The funding allocated to basic cancer prevention research and application is not optimal and less than that for cancer treatment; (2) participation in cancer prevention behaviors and screening practices are lower than desired, especially among the uninsured; (3) a shortage in healthcare professionals is a major challenge in meeting the future needs of cancer prevention; (4) demands on medical schools to balance increased enrollment, incorporate cancer prevention in an already crowded curriculum, and develop faculty are daunting; and (5) healthcare reforms in 2010 provide both opportunities and additional challenges for cancer prevention. Based on the current state of cancer prevention, we formed six recommendations: (1) additional funding for cancer prevention research with a focus on implementation into practice, (2) improved tracking of cancer prevention research funding and the outcomes associated with it, (3) continued monitoring of cancer prevention services participation with emphasis on closing the gap in health disparities, (4) financial and technical assistance to healthcare professional schools for incorporating cancer prevention into curricula, (5) assessment of the current state of technology in cancer prevention care, and (6) the use of effective multidisciplinary teams in cancer prevention care. Improved delivery of cancer prevention services can have a tremendous impact on cancer incidence and survival rates.
Keywords
Prevention Control Workforce CancerNotes
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge all of the members of our group who participated actively during the symposium, including Dr. Elizabeth Grubbs and Dr. Shannon Silkensen.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Thomas L (1983) The youngest science: notes of a medicine-watcher. Viking, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 2.American Cancer Society (2011) Cancer Prevention & Early Detection Facts & Figures 2011. Atlanta: American Cancer SocietyGoogle Scholar
- 3.Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM et al (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365(5):395–409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.National Cancer Institute (2010) NCI Funded Research Portfolio. National Cancer Institues’s division of extramural activities. http://fundedresearch.cancer.gov/. Accessed 10 Jan 2012
- 5.NCI Translational Research Working Group of the National Cancer Advisory Board (2007) Transforming translation—harnessing discovery for patient and public benefit. http://www.cancer.gov/PublishedContent/Files/researchandfunding/trwg/TRWGreport.pdf. Accessed 13 February 2012
- 6.National Center for Research Resources (2009) Clinical and translational science awards: advancing scientific discoveries nationwide to improve health. Progress report 2006–2008. http://www.ncrr.nih.gov/clinical_research_resources/clinical_and_translational_science_awards/publications/2008_ctsa_progress_report.pdf. Accessed 14 February 2012
- 7.Martinez ME, Cohen RA (2011) Health insurance coverage: early release of estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, January–June 2011. National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/insur201112.pdf. Accessed 14 February 2012
- 8.Halle M, Lewis CB, Seshamani M (2012) Health disparities: a case for closing the gap. HHS Web Communications and New Media Division, HHS Office of Health Reform [serial on the Internet]. http://www.healthreform.gov/reports/healthdisparities/. Accessed 10 Jan 2012
- 9.Schiller JS, Lucas JW, Ward BW, Peregoy JA (2012) Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National health interview survey, 2010. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 10(252)Google Scholar
- 10.Ayanian JZ, Kohler BA, Abe T, Epstein AM (1993) The relation between health insurance coverage and clinical outcomes among women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med 329(5):326–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Goss E, Lopez AM, Brown CL, Wollins DS, Brawley OW, Raghavan D (2009) American society of clinical oncology policy statement: disparities in cancer care. J Clin Oncol 27(17):2881–2885PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Ward E, Halpern M, Schrag N, Cokkinides V, DeSantis C, Bandi P et al (2008) Association of insurance with cancer care utilization and outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin 58(1):9–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Erikson C, Salsberg E, Forte G, Bruinooge S, Goldstein M (2007) Future supply and demand for oncologists: challenges to assuring access to oncology services. J Oncol Pract 3(2):79–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Dill MJ, Salsberg ES (2008) The complexities of physician supply and demand: projections through 2025. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges, Center for Workforce StudiesGoogle Scholar
- 15.Buerhaus PI (2008) Current and future state of the US nursing workforce. JAMA 300(20):2422–2424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2011) Shortage designation: health professional shortage areas & medically underserved areas/populations. Health Resources and Services Administration. http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/shortage/. Accessed 10 Jan 2012
- 17.Kane GC, Grever MR, Kennedy JI, Kuzma MA, Saltzman AR, Wiernik PH et al (2009) The anticipated physician shortage: meeting the nation’s need for physician services. Am J Med 122(12):1156–1162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Nekhlyudov L, Braddock CH 3rd (2009) An approach to enhance communication about screening mammography in primary care. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 18(9):1403–1412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Applebaum E, Ruhlen TN, Kronenberg FR, Hayes C, Peters ES (2009) Oral cancer knowledge, attitudes and practices: a survey of dentists and primary care physicians in Massachusetts. J Am Dent Assoc 140(4):461–467PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Silverman S Jr, Kerr AR, Epstein JB (2010) Oral and pharyngeal cancer control and early detection. J Cancer Educ 25(3):279–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Schroeder KL, Heisel DE (1993) Role of dentists in cessation counseling: survey findings. In: Smokeless Tobacco Or Health: An International Perspective. Darby, PA: Diane Publishing Co. pp 297–306Google Scholar
- 22.Association of American Medical Colleges (2008) Diversity in Medical Education: Facts & Figures 2008. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges, Diversity Policy and ProgramsGoogle Scholar
- 23.US Census Bureau (2010) State & County QuickFacts. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html. Accessed 10 Jan 2011
- 24.Alexander H, Liu CQ (2009) The aging of full-time U.S. medical school faculty: 1967–2007. AAMC Anal Brief 9(4):1–12Google Scholar
- 25.Dajani Z, Geller AC (2008) Cancer prevention education in United States medical schools: how far have we come? J Cancer Educ 23(4):204–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Brenner S, Siu K (2009) Preventive medicine and public health residency training: federal policy and advocacy opportunities. J Public Health Manag Pract 15(6 Suppl):S33–S39PubMedGoogle Scholar