Nationwide Scorpion Exposures Reported to US Poison Control Centers from 2005 to 2015
- 175 Downloads
Previous studies of scorpion envenomation in the United States (US) have focused on Arizona and the bark scorpion, Centruroides sculpturatus. Although many other scorpion species live in the US, information about envenomations in other states is lacking.
Nationwide scorpion exposures from 2005 to 2015 were analyzed using the National Poison Data System.
Of the 185,402 total exposures, Arizona (68.2%), Texas (10.3%), and Nevada (4.2%) were the top contributors. However, six other southern states reported greater than 100 cases annually, primarily during the warmer months and evening hours. Envenomations occurred most often in a home (97.8%) and were typically managed on-site (90.1%). Pain was the most common effect nationwide (88.7%). Arizona had the highest frequencies of sensory, neuromuscular, and respiratory effects along with higher hospitalization and ICU admission rates, although the latter appeared to drop over the study period. In contrast, local skin effects such as erythema and edema were more common outside of Arizona. Children under 10 years of age in Arizona and Nevada had the highest rates of systemic effects, hospitalization, and ICU admission.
Scorpion envenomations occurred throughout the southern US with similar seasonal and daily variations. Common clinical effects included pain, local edema, and erythema, except in Arizona and Nevada where severe systemic symptoms were more common. Systemic effects correlated with high rates of ICU admissions and intubations, especially in children under 10 years of age.
KeywordsScorpions Poison control centers United States
Compliance with Ethical Standards
No funding was secured for this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Mowry JB, Spyker DA, Brooks DE, McMillan N, Schauben JL. 2014 annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ National Poison Data System (NPDS): 32nd annual report. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2015;53(10):962–1147. doi:10.3109/15563650.2015.1102927.
- 2.Stahnke HL. Some observations of the genus Centruroides marx (Buthidae, Scorpionida) and C. sculpturatus Ewing. Entomol News. 1971;82(11):281–307.Google Scholar
- 3.Valdez-Cruz NA, Dávila S, Licea A, Corona M, Zamudio FZ, García-Valdes J, et al. Biochemical, genetic and physiological characterization of venom components from two species of scorpions: Centruroides exilicauda Wood and Centruroides sculpturatus Ewing. Biochimie. 2004;86(6):387–96. doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2004.05.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Stahnke HL. The Arizona scorpion problem. Ariz Med. 1950;7(3):23–9.Google Scholar
- 8.Crawford CS, Krehoff RC. Diel activity in sympatric populations of the scorpions Centruroides sculpturatus (Buthidae) and Diplocentrus spitzeri (Diplocentridae). J Arachnol. 1975;2:195–204.Google Scholar
- 14.Stahnke HL. The scorpions of Arizona [dissertation]. Iowa: Iowa State University; 1939.Google Scholar
- 15.Shelley RM, Sissom WD. Distributions of the scorpions Centruroides vittatus (Say) and Centruroides hentzi (Banks) in the United States and Mexico (Scorpiones, Buthidae). J Arachnol. 1995;23:100–10.Google Scholar
- 22.Ayrey RF, Soleglad ME. New species of Vaejovis from the Santa Rita Mountains, southern Arizona (Scorpiones: Vaejovidae). Euscorpius. 2014;183:1–13.Google Scholar