Performance of a Multi-disciplinary Emergency Department Observation Protocol for Acetaminophen Overdose
- 239 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
The availability of 20-h N-acetylcysteine (NAC) infusion for low-risk acetaminophen (APAP) overdose enabled our center to implement an Emergency Department observation unit (OU) protocol as an alternative to hospitalization. Our objective was to evaluate our early experience with this protocol. This retrospective cohort study included all patients treated for low-risk APAP overdose in our academic hospital between 2006 and 2011. Cases were identified using OU and pharmacy records. Successful OU discharge was defined as disposition with no inpatient admission. Differences in medians with 95 % confidence intervals were used for comparisons. One hundred ninety-six patients received NAC for APAP overdose with a mean age of 35 years (SD 14); 73 % were white, and 43 % were male. Twenty (10 %) received care in the OU; 3/20(15 %) met criteria for inclusion in the OU protocol and 13/20(65 %) were discharged successfully. Out of the 196 patients, 10 met criteria for inclusion in the OU protocol but instead received care in the inpatient setting. The median total length of stay from presentation to ED discharge was 41 h for all patients treated in the OU, compared to 68 h for ten patients who met criteria for inclusion in the OU protocol but who were admitted (difference 27 h, 95 % CI 18–72 h). ED observation for APAP overdose can be a viable alternative to inpatient admission. Most patients were successfully discharged from the OU. This evaluation identified both over- and under-utilization of the OU. OU treatment resulted in shorter median length of stay than inpatient admission.
Keywords
Overdose Observation Acetaminophen Length of stayNotes
Acknowledgments
This project was supported in part by an Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Award, NIH/NCRR Grant Number 5UL1RR026314-03 and by a Resident Research Grant from the University Of Cincinnati Department Of Emergency Medicine. Special thanks to Christopher Droege for assistance with hospital pharmacy billing data.
References
- 1.Bronstein AC, Spyker DA, Cantilena LR Jr, Green JL, Rumack BH, Dart RC (2011) 2010 Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ National Poison Data System (NPDS): 28th Annual Report. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 49:910–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Nourjah P, Ahmad SR, Kaworski C (2005) Estimates of acetaminophen-associated overdoses in the United States. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 15:398–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Yarema MC, Johnson DW, Berlin RJ et al (2009) Comparison of the 20-hour intravenous and 72-hour oral acetylcysteine protocols for the treatment of acute acetaminophen poisoning. Ann Emerg Med 54:606–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Yip L, Dart RC (2003) A 20-hour treatment for acute acetaminophen overdose. N Engl J Med 348:2471–2472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Sivilotti ML, Yarema MC, Juurlink DN, Good AM, Johnson DW (2005) A risk quantification instrument for acute acetaminophen overdose patients treated with N-acetylcysteine. Ann Emerg Med 46:263–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Sztajnkrycer MD, Mell HK, Melin GJ (2007) Development and implementation of an emergency department observation unit protocol for deliberate drug ingestion in adults—preliminary results. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 45:499–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Zun LS (2012) Pitfalls in the care of the psychiatric patient in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 43:829–835PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Grol R, Grimshaw J (2003) From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet 362:1225–1230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Straus SE, McAlister FA (2000) Evidence-based medicine: a commentary on common criticisms. Can Med Assoc J 163:837–841Google Scholar
- 10.Rumack BH, Matthew H (1975) Acetaminophen poisoning and toxicity. Pediatrics 55:871–876PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Mace SE, Graff L, Michael M, Ross M (2003) A national survey of observation units in the United States. Am J Emerg Med 21:529–533PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar