Death Following Recreational Use of Designer Drug “Bath Salts” Containing 3,4-Methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV)
- 3.8k Downloads
3,4-Methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) is a designer stimulant drug that has gained popularity in the USA. Although adverse effects of MDPV have been described, to our knowledge, this is the first reported death.
We report the case of a 40-year-old male who injected and snorted “bath salts” containing MDPV and subsequently became agitated, aggressive, and experienced a cardiac arrest. He was resuscitated after his initial arrest; however, he developed hyperthermia, rhabdomyolysis, coagulopathy, acidosis, anoxic brain injury, and subsequently died.
This is the first case in the medical literature to report death due to isolated confirmed MDPV intoxication. The manner of death is also consistent with excited delirium syndrome.
Keywords3,4-Methylenedioxypyrovalerone Bath salts Excited delirium syndrome MDPV Designer drug
Psychoactive products containing β-keto phenylalkylamines such as 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV), mephedrone, and methylone have entered the recreational drug market over the past several years. These products are often labeled as “bath salts” or “plant food,” with the disclaimer that they are “not for human consumption” to skirt state and federal laws. Although states are creating new laws to address these derivatives, an increasing number of exposures have been reported to United States (US) poison centers since late 2010 .
Upon arrival in the hospital, he continued with very aggressive behavior and incomprehensible screaming. A review of the patient’s electronic medical records revealed previous routine medications of quetiapine, methadone, temazepam, and 10/650 mg hydrocodone/acetaminophen. As the patient was never conversant, compliance was not established. Vital signs at the time of his arrival, 15 min after reported EMS vital signs, were as follows: oral temperature 98.0°F; blood pressure 100/64 mmHg; heart rate 91 bpm; respiratory rate 12 breaths/min; and oxygen saturation of 100% on NRB. While being transitioned from the Emergency Medical Services stretcher to a hospital bed, and without further intervention, he became very quiet and withdrawn. Within 5 minutes of his arrival to the hospital he developed bradycardia and subsequent cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity (PEA). Standard advanced cardiac life support measures were initiated including cardiopulmonary resuscitation and administration of two doses each of 1 mg intravenous (IV) epinephrine and 1 mg IV atropine, as well as 100 mg of IV lidocaine. He was intubated and given both 2 mg IV naloxone and 0.5 mg IV flumazenil without effect. Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved after 30 min of resuscitation. Dopamine and phenylephrine infusions were initiated at rates of 5 mcg/kg/h and 10 mcg/h, respectively, due to persistent hypotension despite a bolus infusion of 2 liters 0.9% normal saline (NS).
Immediately after resuscitation, a rectal temperature was 105.4°F, for which he was given 1,300 mg of acetaminophen per rectum. Other vital signs included a blood pressure of 70/32 mmHg; heart rate of 91 bpm; and oxygen saturation of 100% while mechanically ventilated. Physical examination revealed a Glascow coma scale score of 3 and pupils dilated at 6 mm with minimal reaction to light. Skin examination revealed dry skin with multiple needle marks in both antecubital fossae. Additionally, there was no evidence of hypertonia, hyperreflexia, inducible or spontaneous clonus, or bruxism.
He was admitted to the medical intensive care unit where he was started on an infusion of 5% dextrose in water with 150 mEq of sodium bicarbonate at a rate of 125 ml/h, hydrocortisone (100 mg IV every 8 h), and propofol infusion (10 mcg/kg/h). Persistent hypotension was treated with an additional 2 liters of bolused NS and a vasopressin infusion was started at 0.04 units/min. Over the next 3 h, he developed a worsening metabolic acidosis (arterial pH 7.14; HCO3 10 mmol/L) with oliguric renal failure that progressed to anuria (creatinine 4.26 mg/dL), worsening transaminase elevation (AST 10,873 U/L; ALT 6,623 U/L), and rhabdomyolysis (creatinine kinase 75,952 U/L). His coagulopathy progressed and his INR was >9.3 (upper limit of laboratory detection) and PT >96 s (upper limit of laboratory detection). He was noted to be very pale and began having melanotic stools. He developed an anemia (hemoglobin of 6.3 g/dL) and thrombocytopenia with platelets of 11 × 109/L. Hemodialysis was started 17 h after presentation to correct the acidosis and renal failure. Additionally, he received packed red blood cells (4 units), platelets (2 units), cryoprecipitate (9 units), and fresh frozen plasma (10 units). A non-contrasted brain computed tomography showed decreased gray–white matter discrimination interpreted by the radiologist as “likely edema and early anoxic injury.” An EEG was performed and showed diffuse slowing consistent with coma and likely anoxic injury.
Despite improvement in his acidosis and anemia after dialysis and transfusion, his neurologic exam worsened. His pupils became fixed and dilated and he lost his gag, corneal, and vestibulo-ocular reflexes. He no longer responded to noxious stimuli. Approximately 42 h after his initial presentation, the patient was declared brain dead by clinical criteria and support was withdrawn.
During his evaluation, several toxicology laboratories were evaluated on blood and urine samples obtained at the time of arrival to the tertiary care center. His urine was negative for barbiturates, amphetamines, benzodiazepines, cocaine, marijuana, methadone, and opiates. Urine liquid chromatography was positive for trimethoprim. Serum ethanol levels were 11 mg/dL (8 h after presentation) and 25 mg/dL (19 h after presentation). His qualitative urine methadone screen was negative. Serum salicylate level was 7.9 mg/dL and serum acetaminophen level was 2.9 mcg/mL. A lithium level was <0.1 mmol/L. Ethanol, ethylene glycol, methanol, and isopropanol were not detected by gas chromatography 21 h after presentation.
Samples of the patient’s urine and serum obtained at the time of his arrival to the tertiary care center were sent for further testing at NMS Labs (Forensic Science Department, Willow Grove, PA). An initial therapeutic drug screen using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry was performed and positive for acetaminophen, caffeine, cotinine, lidocaine, trimethoprim, and MDPV; quetiapine was not detected. Confirmatory testing was undertaken using high performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MSMS). Specimens were fortified with d8-MDPV as an internal standard and then subjected to a single step liquid-liquid extraction using trichloroacetic acid (TCA). MDPV was quantified in his urine (670 ng/mL) and serum (82 ng/mL). Trimethoprim was also quantified using high performance thin layer chromatography (12 mcg/mL in urine and 2.2 mcg/mL in serum).
MDPV is a white or tan powder that is insufflated, injected intravenously, or ingested. Although few studies have formally examined the clinical effects or metabolism of MDPV in humans, multiple first-hand reports and a handful of published case reports now exist [6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. Stimulant effects, an increase in libido, anxiety, hallucinations, and paranoid psychosis have been reported . MDPV appears to undergo CYP450 2D6, 2C19, and COMT phase 1 metabolism into methylcatechol and pyrrolidine, which in turn are glucuronidated to allow for renal excretion [11, 12]. Although the mechanism of action is not fully elucidated at this time, a dopaminergic mechanism is hypothesized due to the chemical similarity to amphetamines and the behavioral effects of MDPV that mimic those of amphetamines which are known to affect dopaminergic pathways. Studies on other pyrovalerone analogs demonstrated potent inhibition of the dopamine and norepinephrine transporters responsible for reuptake of their corresponding neurotransmitters . Further supporting this hypothesis are animal studies demonstrating MDPV increases dopamine levels in experimental mice and rats [14, 15].
Since late 2010, MDPV has been the most commonly detected β-keto phenylalkylamine in toxicologic analysis of “bath salts,” “plant foods,” or other legal highs in the USA. This differs from the European experience where mephedrone was most commonly detected in these substances [1, 9, 16]. This difference has an unknown clinical significance, as reports of β-keto phenylalkylamine use in the USA describe similar sympathomimetic effects of both mephedrone and MDPV, including agitation, hypertension, palpitations, hallucinations, and violent behavior; however, the US reports have differed in part from those from Europe by the increased prevalence of MDPV, as well as an increase in cases involving rhabdomyolysis.
We report a case of MDPV toxicity with symptoms consistent with Excited Delirium Syndrome (ExDS) followed by a sudden PEA arrest, return of spontaneous circulation, and subsequent development of coagulopathy, rhabdomyolysis, renal failure, hepatic failure, anoxic brain injury, and death. This is the first case in the medical literature to report death due to isolated MDPV intoxication. Toxicological analysis of serum and urine revealed MDPV as an isolated intoxicant. Additionally, while a death consistent with ExDS has been reported after mephedrone use, to our knowledge, this is the first reported MDPV-associated death .
ExDS is characterized by delirium with agitation, hyperthermia, tachypnea, tachycardia, a period of “giving up,” or cessation of struggle, followed by cardiac arrest, as was seen in our patient . ExDS most likely results from dysregulation of dopaminergic pathways. ExDS autopsy data have shown a decreased number of D3 dopamine receptors when compared to controls . This suggests that ExDS patients may lack normal compensatory measures for dealing with rapid changes in dopamine levels. Furthermore, hypothalamic dopamine receptors are responsible for thermoregulation, and patients with ExDS have elevated heat shock proteins consistent with the clinically observed hyperthermia . Hyperthermia in these patients is likely a sign of autonomic dysfunction that results in death in many ExDS patients. However, in patients that survive the initial arrest, such as the patient in this report, hyperthermia likely contributes to the coagulopathy, rhabdomyolysis, and multisystem organ failure that result in death after the initial insult. ExDS has been described with MDMA, cocaine, and amphetamine intoxication [20, 21].
In our case, the patient’s previous history of cocaine abuse may have also predisposed him to ExDS, as chronic cocaine abuse is known to alter neurotransmitters such as dopamine . The dopaminergic effects of MDPV likely contributed to aberrant thermoregulation, and the sympathomimetic effects contributed to the agitation, delirium, and the cardiac arrest in this patient. Treatment for MDPV intoxication, along with other drugs in the stimulant class and patients with ExDS remains largely supportive, with the use of intravenous benzodiazepines, intravenous fluids, and cooling.
The patient in this case was also found to have trimethoprim present on serum and urine testing. This was quantified (12 mcg/mL in urine and 2.2 mcg/mL in serum) and present in amounts that exceed previous reports of peak plasma levels in single one-time ingestions of 160 mg doses . Trimethoprim is not reported to cause stimulant effects with chronic use or in acute overdose. There are reports of hyperkalemia occurring in patients predisposed to potassium retention (underlying renal failure or concurrent diuretic use) [24, 25]. Our patient was not known to be taking a trimethoprim-containing medication, and personal communication with the laboratory performing the test (telephone correspondence with Dr. S. Kacinko, NMS Labs, August 2011) revealed an additional case where MDPV and trimethoprim were found together using similar testing methods. We hypothesize that this may be an adulterant in some formulations of “bath salts,” including that which our patient consumed. It is therefore possible trimethoprim contributed to our patient’s hyperkalemia, but we do not feel it is responsible for his ExDS symptoms or ultimate death.
We were initially perplexed as to why our patient’s serum ethanol level continued to rise well after admission even with the initiation of hemodialysis; however, ethanol was not detected on a volatile alcohol screen performed on blood obtained during this time period. Most likely the serum ethanol levels quantified via the serum ethanol assay (Beckman UniCel DxC, Beckman Coulter Inc, Brea, CA) were falsely elevated due to interference from the patient’s profoundly elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (11,108 IU/L, 19 h after presentation) and lactate levels (10.7 mmol/L, 19 h after presentation). This interference of LDH and lactate with serum ethanol determination has been described with multiple instruments/assays, including the methodology used to measure ethanol in this case [26, 27, 28]. These assays are based on the conversion of ethanol to acetylaldehyde by alcohol dehydrogenase reducing NAD to NADH in the process, which is quantitated by absorbance at 340 nm due to NADH formation. Assay interference occurs when excess LDH and lactate allow for conversion of NAD to NADH in a reaction unrelated to the presence of ethanol.
Recreational abuse of “bath salts” products continues despite legislative initiatives to prohibit its use. While this is the first reported case of death due to isolated recreational use of MDPV with confirmatory toxicological analyses, further characterization of symptoms related to intoxication and associated deaths is needed. This case highlights the need for emergency physicians and toxicologists to be vigilant in testing for novel drugs of abuse, as it allows for an improved understanding of the potential toxicity of these drugs and associated adulterants.
- 2.Yohannan J, Bozenko J (2010) The characterization of 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDVP). Microgram Journal 7:21–15Google Scholar
- 3.1-[(3, 4-Methylenedioxy)phenyl]-2-pyrrolidino-1 alkanones as stimulants (1969) Boehringer Ingelheim Study Google Scholar
- 6.Antonowicz J, Metzger A, Ramanujam S (2011) Paranoid psychosis induced by consumption of methylenedioxypyrovalerone: two cases. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 33(6):640.e5-6Google Scholar
- 9.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2011) Emergency department visits after use of a drug sold as “bath salts”-Michigan, November 13, 2010-March 31, 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 60(19):624–627Google Scholar
- 10.Smith C, Cardile C, Miller C (2011) Bath salts as a “legal high.” Am J Med. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.03.014
- 11.Strano-Rossi S, Cadwallader AB, de la Torre X, Botre F (2010) Toxicological determination and in vitro metabolism of the designer drug methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography/quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 24(18):2706–2714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Meyer M, Du P, Schuster F, Maurer H (2010) Studies on the metabolism of the α-pyrrolidinophenone designer drug methylenedioxy-pyrovalerone (MDPV) in rat and human urine and human liver microsomes using GC-MS and LC-high-resolution MS and its detectability in urine by GC-MS. J Mass Spectrom 45(12):1426–1442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Fuma T, Kodama T, Honda Y, Tanaka T, Kubo Y, Ohashi N et al (2009) Influence of methy lenedioxypyrovalerone on central nervous system using micro dialysis method. ChemBio Integrated Management 5:62–72Google Scholar
- 22.Staley J, Welti C, Ruttenber A et al (1995) Altered dopaminergic synaptic markers in cocaine psychosis and sudden death. NIDA Res Monogr Series 153:491Google Scholar
- 25.Lam N, Weir M, Juurlink D, Gunraj N, Gomes T, Mamdani M et al (2011) Hospital admissions for hyperkalemia with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole: a cohort study using health care database codes for 393,039 older women with urinary tract infections. Am J Kidney Dis 57(3):521–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Nine J, Moraca M, Virji M, Rao K (1995) Serum-ethanol determination: comparison of lactate and lactate dehydrogenase interference in three enzymatic assays. J Anal Toxicol 19:192–196Google Scholar
- 27.Gharapetian A, Holmes D, Urquhart N, Rosenerg F (2008) Dehydrogenase interference with enzymatic ethanol assays: forgotten but not gone. Clin Chem 54(7):1251–1252Google Scholar
- 28.King G, Bissell M (2011) Does your lab produce false positive ethanol results? AACC/CAP Serum Alcohol Proficiency Survey A12-C:2–4Google Scholar