Political Environment and Perceptions of Social Inclusion After Nationwide Marriage Equality Among Partnered Men Who Have Sex with Men in the USA
The aim of this paper is to examine how nationwide marriage equality and minority stressors are associated with perceptions of social inclusion using a national sample of partnered men who have sex with men (MSM) (n = 498). A four-item scale measuring changes in perceived social inclusion due to the nationwide legalization of same-sex marriage was created. Respondents were categorized into four distinct political environments using results from the 2016 US Presidential election. Multilevel modeling was used to examine associations between political environment, minority stressors, and perceived social inclusion. Changes in perceived social inclusion due to marriage equality did not significantly differ between political environments. Higher levels of internalized, anticipated, and enacted stigma were all associated with fewer gains in perceived social inclusion. An interaction between political environment and external stigma was significant in the most politically conservative areas. The legalization of marriage equality has improved perceived social inclusion overall, but less so among men who experience more discrimination and live in conservative environments. Multilevel interventions to change social norms are needed to help decrease minority stressors and improve perceived social inclusion in politically conservative areas with elevated levels of discrimination.
KeywordsSocial inclusion Marriage equality Minority stress Political environment Social norms
This study uses data collected as part of an NIH-funded grant (1R01HD078131-01A1).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
- Bauermeister, J. A., Eaton, L., Andrzejewski, J., Loveluck, J., VanHemert, W., & Pingel, E. S. (2015). Where you live matters: Structural correlates of HIV risk behavior among young men who have sex with men in metro Detroit. AIDS and Behavior, 19(12), 2358–2369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1180-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Berg, R. C., Ross, M. W., Weatherburn, P., & Schmidt, A. J. (2013). Structural and environmental factors are associated with internalised homonegativity in men who have sex with men: Findings from the european MSM internet survey (EMIS) in 38 countries. Social Science & Medicine, 78, 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Crandall, C. S., Miller, J. M., & White, M. H. (2018). Changing norms following the 2016 US presidential election: The trump effect on prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 186–192.Google Scholar
- Gates, G. J. (2006). Same-sex couples and the gay, lesbian, bisexual population: New estimates from the american community survey. UCLA: The Williams Institute. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8h08t0zf. Accessed 22 Aug 2018.
- Institute of Medicine. (2011). The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: Building a foundation for better understanding. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine Retrieved from https://iom.nationalacademies.org/Reports/2011/The-Health-of-Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-and-Transgender-People/Report-Brief.aspx?page=2.Google Scholar
- Meyer, I. H., Dean, L., & Herek, G. (1998). Internalized homophobia, intimacy, and sexual behavior among gay and bisexual men. Psychological Perspectives on Lesbian and Gay Issues, 4, 160–186.Google Scholar
- Obergellfell v. Hodges et al. (2015). Retrieved from https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf.
- Pew Research Center. (2014). Political polarization in the american public. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2014/06/12/section-3-political-polarization-and-personal-life/.
- Pew Research Center. (2017). Changing attitudes on gay marriage. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/fact-sheet/changing-attitudes-on-gay-marriage/.
- Ramos, C., Goldberg, N. G., & Badgett, M. (2009). The effects of marriage equality in Massachusetts: A survey of the experiences and impact of marriage on same-sex couples. UCLA: The Williams Institute. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9dx6v3kj. Accessed 22 Aug 2018.
- Sanders, S. (2016, October 30, 2016). 2016 has been a mixed bag for LGBT politics. National Public Radio Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/2016/10/30/499895397/2016-has-been-a-mixed-bag-for-lgbt-politics.
- Smolenski, D. J., Diamond, P. M., Ross, M. W., & Rosser, B. R. S. (2010). Revision, criterion validity, and multigroup assessment of the reactions to homosexuality scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(6), 568–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.513300.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Steele, F., Clarke, P., Leckie, G., Allan, J., & Johnston, D. (2016). Multilevel structural equation models for longitudinal data where predictors are measured more frequently than outcomes: An application to the effects of stress on the cognitive function of nurses. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.Series A: Statistics in Society, 180, 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Townhall Media. (2017). Election results 2016. Retrieved from https://townhall.com/election/2016/president/.
- United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2016). Leaving no one behind: The imperative of inclusive development. New York: United Nations Retrieved from http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/rwss/2016/chapter1.pdf.Google Scholar