Advertisement

Sexuality Research and Social Policy

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 12–21 | Cite as

Challenges in Reach with Online Sexual Health Information Among African American Youth: Assessing Access and Engagement

  • M. Margaret DolciniEmail author
  • Joseph A. Catania
  • Coral Cotto-Negron
  • Jesse A. Canchola
  • Jocelyn Warren
  • Cara Ashworth
  • Gary W. Harper
  • Senna Towner
Article
  • 88 Downloads

Abstract

There is a need for sexual health promotion among African American youth. The internet is an efficient means of delivering sexual health information (SHI). However, there may be disparities that reduce internet reach to low-income African American youth. The present mixed-methods study analyzed data from the U.S. Current Population Survey (national household sample; ages 14–17) and the Two-Cities Study (Chicago, San Francisco; low-income African Americans, ages 15–17) to examine internet reach, defined as access and engagement. We found that nationally, in-home internet access and cell/smartphone ownership varied by income and race/ethnicity. In-home internet access (52%) and cell/smartphone ownership (75%) were lowest among low-income African American youth. Access from other locations (e.g., libraries, schools) was also quite low. The Two-Cities Study showed that internet access and site engagement were limited by site blocking, poor privacy, affordability, and trust. Youths’ trust in SHI was conditional on their ability to authenticate SHI websites. Our study suggests that there is limited reach into African American and low-income groups, which may be addressed by decreasing internet blocking, enhancing privacy, and supporting community programs and policies to facilitate internet access. Trust in sexual health websites may be increased through directed engagement and authentication by health experts. Without higher levels of access and implementation of strategies to enhance engagement, the potential of the internet as a vehicle for sexual health promotion among African American youth will not be realized.

Keywords

Reach Engagement Internet Sexual health Adolescents African American Access Trust 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. We would like to thank the Bureau of the Census for making the CPS data available, the communities and participants for Two-Cities Study, and Amy Young for supporting manuscript preparation.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, grant number R01 HD061027-01, awarded to M.M.D.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The institutional review boards of the sponsoring institutions approved the study. We obtained written informed consent from parents/guardians and written assent from the youth providing interviews.

Consent for Publication

All authors have approved this manuscript for submission.

Availability of Data and Material

The current study used two data sets. One data set analyzed for the current study is available from the United States Census Bureau Current Population Survey at https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cps.html (U.S. Census Bureau, 2006, 2013). Study-related material from the second data set is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abramson, Larry. (2011). Comcast Offers A Digital Lifeline To The Disconnected. Retrieved 05/24/2017, from http://www.npr.org/2011/09/12/140336719/comcast-offers-a-digital-lifeline-to-the-disconnected.
  2. Attfield, Simon, Kazai, Gabriella, Lalmas, Mounia, & Piwowarski, Benjamin. (2011). Towards a science of user engagement (position paper). Paper presented at the WSDM workshop on user modelling for Web applications.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, G. G., & Glasgow, R. E. (2009). The delivery of public health interventions via the internet: Actualizing their potential. Annual Review of Public Health, 30, 273–292.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100235.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyar, R., Levine, D., & Zensius, N. (2011). Youth sexuality and reproductive health in the digital age. Oakland. In I. ISIS (Ed.), TECHsex USA. The Ford Foundation: Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
  5. Brady, S. S., Sieving, R. E., Terveen, L. G., Rosser, B. R. S., Kodet, A. J., & Rothberg, V. D. (2015). An interactive website to reduce sexual risk behavior: Process evaluation of TeensTalkHealth. JMIR Research Protocols, 4(3), e106.  https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.3440.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bull, S., Devine, S., Schmiege, S. J., Pickard, L., Campbell, J., & Shlay, J. C. (2016). Text messaging, teen outreach program, and sexual health behavior: A cluster randomized trial. American Journal of Public Health, 106(S1), S117–S124.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303363.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bull, S. S., Levine, D. K., Black, S. R., Schmiege, S. J., & Santelli, J. (2012). Social media–delivered sexual health intervention: A cluster randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(5), 467–474.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.022.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Catania, J. A., & Dolcini, M. M. (2012). A social-ecological perspective on vulnerable youth: Toward an understanding of sexual development among urban African American adolescents. Research in Human Development, 9(1), 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2012.654428.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Cauce, A. M., Domenech-Rodríguez, M., Paradise, M., Cochran, B. N., Shea, J. M., Srebnik, D., & Baydar, N. (2002). Cultural and contextual influences in mental health help seeking: A focus on ethnic minority youth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(1), 44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2015. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  11. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Council of Economic Advisors. (2016). The digital divide and economic benefits of broadband access. Washington, DC: The White House.Google Scholar
  13. Crutzen, R., de Nooijer, J., Brouwer, W., Oenema, A., Brug, J., & de Vries, N. K. (2009). A conceptual framework for understanding and improving adolescents’ exposure to Internet-delivered interventions. Health Promotion International, 24(3), 277–284.  https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dap018.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, Mark. (2016). Sprint 1Million Project Seeks to Close ‘Homework Gap’. Retrieved May 24, 2017, from http://www.centerdigitaled.com/k-12/Sprint-1Million-Project-Seeks-to-Close-Homework-Gap.html.
  15. Dolcini, M. M., Catania, J. A., Harper, G. W., Boyer, C. B., & Richards, K. A. M. (2012). Sexual health information networks: What are urban African American youth learning? Research in Human Development, 9(1), 54–77.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2012.654432.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Dolcini, M. M., Warren, J., Towner, S. L., Catania, J. A., & Harper, G. W. (2015). Information age: Do urban African-American youth find sexual health information online? Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 12(2), 110–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. File, Thom, & Ryan, Camille. (2014). Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2013 (American Community Survey Reports, ACS-28). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  18. Filho, F., Britto, D., Paranhos, R., da Rocha, E. C., Batista, M., da Silva Jr., J. A., Santos, M. L., Wanderley, D., & Marino, J. G. (2013). When is statistical significance not significant? Brazilian Political Science Review, 7(1), 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaglio, B., & Glasgow, R. E. (2017). Evaluation approaches for dissemination and implementation research. In R. C. Brownson, G. A. Colditz, & E. K. Proctor (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health (second ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gray, N. J., Klein, J. D., Noyce, P. R., Sesselberg, T. S., & Cantrill, J. A. (2005). Health information-seeking behaviour in adolescence: The place of the internet. Social Science & Medicine, 60(7), 1467–1478.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guilamo-Ramos, V., Lee, J. J., Kantor, L. M., Levine, D. S., Baum, S., & Johnsen, J. (2015). Potential for using online and mobile education with parents and adolescents to impact sexual and reproductive health. Prevention Science, 16(1), 53–60.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-014-0469-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Guse, K., Levine, D., Martins, S., Lira, A., Gaarde, J., Westmorland, W., & Gilliam, M. (2012). Interventions using new digital media to improve adolescent sexual health: A systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(6), 535–543.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.03.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., Osterman, M., Curtin, S. C., & Matthews, T. (2015). Births: Final data for 2014 (National Vital Statistics Reports; vol 64 no 12). Retrieved from National Center for Vital Statistics: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr64/nvsr64_12.pdf.
  24. Horrigan, J. B., & Duggan, M. (2015). Home broadband 2015. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  25. Howard, M. N., Davis, J. A., & Mitchell, M. E. (2011). Improving low-income teen health behaviors with internet-linked clinic interventions. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 8(1), 50–57.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-011-0037-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones, R. K., & Biddlecom, A. E. (2011). Is the internet filling the sexual health information gap for teens? An exploratory study. Journal of Health Communication, 16(2), 112–123.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2010.535112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lenhart, A. (2015). Teens, social media & technology overview 2015. Retrieved from Pew Research Center: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/.
  29. Lenhart, A., Smith, A., Anderson, M., Duggan, M., & Perrin, A. (2015). Teens, Technology, & Friendships. Retrieved from Pew Research Center: http://assets.pewresearch.org/wpcontent/uploads/sites/14/2015/08/Teens-and-Friendships-FINAL2.pdf.
  30. Lindsey, M. A., Korr, W. S., Broitman, M., Bone, L., Green, A., & Leaf, P. J. (2006). Help-seeking behaviors and depression among African American adolescent boys. Social Work, 51(1), 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McKee, M. D., Karasz, A., & Weber, C. M. (2004). Health care seeking among urban minority adolescent girls: The crisis at sexual debut. The Annals of Family Medicine, 2(6), 549–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ralph, L. J., Berglas, N. F., Schwartz, S. L., & Brindis, C. D. (2011). Finding teens in TheirSpace: Using social networking sites to connect youth to sexual health services. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 8(1), 38–49.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-011-0043-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rangel, M. C., Gavin, L., Reed, C., Fowler, M. G., & Lee, L. M. (2006). Epidemiology of HIV and AIDS among adolescents and young adults in the United States. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39(2), 156–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds. Retrieved from Kaiser Family Foundation: https://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/8010.pdf.
  35. Romero, L., Pazol, K., Warner, L., Cox, S., Kroelinger, C., Besera, G., Brittain, A., Fller, T. R., . . . Barfield, W. (2016). Reduced disparities in birth rates among teens aged 15–19 years—United States, 2006–2007 and 2013–2014. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 65(16), 409-428.Google Scholar
  36. Ryan, Camille, & Lewis, Jamie M. (2017). Computer and internet use in the United States. 2015 American Community Survey Reports: United States Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  37. Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). California: Sage Publications Limited.Google Scholar
  38. Salzer, M. S. (2015). Advancing research on engagement in internet interventions: A comment on Owen et al. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49(2), 147–148.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-014-9660-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Stern, P. N. (1991). Are counting and coding a cappella appropriate in qualitative research. (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research: A Contemporary Dialogue (pp. 147–162), Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  40. The White House. (2015). ConnectHome: Coming together to ensure digital opportunity for all Americans. Fact Sheet. from https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/07/15/fact-sheet-connecthome-coming-together-ensure-digital-opportunity-all.
  41. U.S. Census Bureau. (2006). Current population survey design and methodology technical paper 66. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/prod/2006pubs/tp-66.pdf.
  42. United States Census Bureau. (2013). Current Population Survey, School Enrollment in the United States: October 2012 - Detailed Tables. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2012/demo/schoolenrollment/2012-cps.html.
  43. Ulin, P. R., Robinson, E. T., & Tolley, E. E. (2005). Qualitative methods in public health. San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass.Google Scholar
  44. Veinot, T. C., Campbell, T. R., Kruger, D. J., & Grodzinski, A. (2013). A question of trust: User-centered design requirements for an informatics intervention to promote the sexual health of African-American youth. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(4), 758–765.  https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Williams, Dacia R, Dolcini, M Margaret, Singh, R R, Geter, T, & Catania, Joseph A. (2016). Perceptions of sexual health websites by low income urban African American youth and service providers. Paper presented at the Oregon Public Health Association Annual Meeting, Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar
  46. Zhao, S. (2009). Parental education and children’s online health information seeking: Beyond the digital divide debate. Social Science & Medicine, 69(10), 1501–1505.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Margaret Dolcini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joseph A. Catania
    • 1
  • Coral Cotto-Negron
    • 1
  • Jesse A. Canchola
    • 2
  • Jocelyn Warren
    • 3
  • Cara Ashworth
    • 1
  • Gary W. Harper
    • 4
  • Senna Towner
    • 5
  1. 1.Hallie E. Ford Center for Healthy Children and Families, College of Public Health and Human SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.StatCon ConsultingHaywardUSA
  3. 3.Lane County Department of Public HealthEugeneUSA
  4. 4.School of Public HealthUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  5. 5.Department of Health & Human DevelopmentWestern Washington UniversityBellinghamUSA

Personalised recommendations