Prevalence of Military Sexual Trauma and Sexual Orientation Discrimination Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Military Personnel: a Descriptive Study
- 930 Downloads
Despite the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Don’t Pursue (DADT) and the update to the Transgender Policy, there remain concerns about the persistence of military sexual trauma (MST) and sexual orientation discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) service members. A sample of 253 participants (89 women, 164 men) completed an Internet-based survey that assessed the prevalence of sexual orientation discrimination (e.g., offensive speech, physical or discriminatory behaviors) and MST (e.g., sexual harassment and sexual assault). The survey was conducted between April 2012 and October 2013. Women and men reported similar levels of sexual orientation discrimination in the military. Participants reported experiencing more threats and intimation, vandalism, and physical assault outside of the military than inside the military (p < 0.05). Although the prevalence of MST (both sexual harassment and sexual assault) in the military was high among both genders, women were more likely to report experiences of sexual harassment compared to men (p < 0.05). Our findings demonstrate the prevalence of MST and sexual orientation discrimination among LGBT service members in the military and point to the need for strong accountability and oversight to protect sexual minority persons while they are serving their country.
KeywordsLGBT Sexual orientation discrimination MST Sexual harassment Sexual assault
The Serving Proud study was conducted by the Hunter College Center for HIV/AIDS Educational Studies and Training (CHEST), under the direction of Jeffrey T. Parsons. The authors acknowledge the contributions of other members of the Serving Proud Research Team: Aaron Belkin, Ruben Jimenez, and Chris Hietikko, and would also like to thank those who consulted with us on the project: Andrew Jenkins, Grace Macalino, Katie Miller, Ron Nalley, Jeff Mueller, and OutServe-SLDN.
Funding for this project was provided through collaboration between the Palm Center and the Center for HIV Educational Studies and Training (CHEST) at Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- Bastian, L. D., Lancaster, A. R., & Reist, H. E. (1995). Department of Defense 1995 sexual harassment survey. Retrieved from Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
- Blosnich, J. R., Bossarte, R. M., & Silenzio, V. M. (2012). Suicidal ideation among sexual minority veterans: Results from the 2005-2010 Massachusetts Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey. Am J Public Health, 102(Suppl 1), S44–S47. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300565.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Department of Defense. (2016). Department of Defense annual report on sexual assault in the military fiscal year 2016. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://sapr.mil/index.php/reports.
- Joshi, Y. (2014). The trouble with inclusion. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law, 21(2), 207–265.Google Scholar
- Kerrigan, M. F. (2011). Transgender discrimination in the military: The new don’t ask, don’t tell. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025771.
- Mattocks, K., Sadler, A., Yano, E., Krebs, E., Zephyrin, L., Brandt, C., et al. (2013). Sexual victimization, health status, and VA healthcare utilization among lesbian and bisexual OEF/OIF veterans. JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28(2), 604–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2357-9.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- National Defense Research Institute. (2010). Sexual orientation and U.S. Military Personnel Policy: An update of RAND’s 1993 Study. RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
- Office of the Inspector General. (2000). Military environment with respect to the homosexual conduct policy (D-2000-101). Arlington, VA: Department of Defense. Retrieved from http://www.dodig.mil/audit/reports/fy00/00-101.pdf.
- Rock, L. M., Lipari, R. N., Cook, P. J., & Hale, A. D. (2010). 2010 Workplace and gender relations survey of active duty members: Overview report on sexual assault.Google Scholar
- U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1988). Sexual harassment in the federal government: An update. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Wilson, L. C. (2016). The prevalence of military sexual trauma. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016683459.