Barriers to Gender-Affirming Care for Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Individuals
Gender-affirming care, including hormone therapy, “top” (e.g., chest reconstruction surgery) and “bottom” (e.g., vaginoplasty, phalloplasty, metoidioplasty, etc.) surgeries, and puberty blockers, is an efficacious treatment of gender dysphoria for transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) individuals. However, many TGNC people encounter significant barriers in accessing gender-affirming care, which we detail via results from on online study. Participants included 256 TGNC individuals (78.9% White, ages 16–73, M age = 28.4). Among participants, 61.3% were receiving hormone therapy, 22.7% had undergone top surgery, and 5.5% had undergone bottom surgery. Open-ended responses (n = 201) were thematically analyzed and common barriers included finances and insurance issues, a lack of service availability, and fears or worries. Participants reported various systemic issues and incidents of bias within medical and mental health fields, as well as a lack of medical provider awareness and education. Other themes were interpersonal barriers (e.g., fears of rejection); age and need of parental consent for minors; other medical issues; and a lack of information about how to acquire care. These findings can be utilized to educate professionals in medical and mental health fields about barriers their TGNC patients may encounter in receiving affirming care and suggest a number of ways to improve access to these services.
KeywordsTransgender Gender nonconforming Genderqueer Gender-affirming care Barriers to transition Healthcare stigma
The authors would like to thank the members of the Trans Health Community Advisory Board who assisted with this project for their time, feedback, and dedicated involvement in this work.
The project described herein was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (1F32DA038557).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- Anton, B. S. (2009). Proceedings of the American Psychological Association for the legislative year 2008: Minutes of the annual meeting of the Council of Representatives, February 22-24, 2008, Washington, DC, and August 13 and 17, 2008, Boston, MA, and minutes of the February, June, August, and December 2008 meetings of the Board of Directors. The American Psychologist, 64, 372–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Grant, J., Mottet, L., Tanis, J., Harrison, J., Herman, J., & Keisling, M. (2011). Injustice at every turn: A report of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. Washington, DC: Washington National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.Google Scholar
- James, S. E., Herman, J. L., Rankin, S., Keisling, M., Mottet, L., & Anafi, M. (2016). The report of the 2015 U.S. transgender survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality.Google Scholar
- Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Snelgrove, J., Jasudavisius, A., Rowe, B., Head, E., & Bauer, G. (2012). “Completely out-at-sea” with “two-gender medicine”: A qualitative analysis of physician-side barriers to providing healthcare for transgender patients. BMC Health Services Research, 12, 110–123.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Sperber, J., Landers, S., & Lawrence, S. (2008). The health and social services needs of transgender people in Philadelphia. International Journal of Transgenderism, 8(2–3), 31–47.Google Scholar
- Viera, A. J., & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding interbserver agreement: The Kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37, 360–363.Google Scholar