Sexuality Research and Social Policy

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 434–444 | Cite as

Confessional Technologies and the Will to Disclose: Mobilizing Emotions and Lived Experience in AIDS Service Organizations in Canada

  • Jennifer M. Kilty
  • Michael Orsini


This research highlights how frontline workers in the HIV/AIDS sector in Canada mobilize the confessional as a technology of governance to encourage changes in the sexual health and safety and disclosure practices of HIV-positive men and women. The ways in which frontline workers counsel clients are especially important in light of Canada’s aggressive growth in criminal prosecutions against individuals for failing to disclose their HIV status to sexual partners. Drawing on 62 semi-structured interviews with AIDS service organization (ASO) staff from across Canada, we suggest that the work performed by ASO workers constitutes a form of bioethics on the ground, which is rooted in both the worker’s and the client’s lived experiences of HIV. It can be especially fraught if the lived experience is mobilized in ways that are ultimately disempowering for clients who do not relate to the individual’s disclosure narrative.


Bioethics HIV nondisclosure Confessional HIV/AIDS Emotions 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

We received approval from the University of Ottawa’s Research Ethics Board in January 2014.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


This research was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research [grant number 220829-190399-2001].

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. Adam, B. D., Globerman, J., Elliott, R., Corriveau, P., English, K., & Rourke, S. (2016). HIV-positive people’s perspectives on Canadian criminal law and non-disclosure. Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 31(1), 1–2 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adam, B. D., Corriveau, P., Elliott, R., Globerman, J., English, K., & Rourke, S. (2014). HIV disclosure as practice and public policy. Critical Public Health, 25(4), 386–397.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Adam, B. D., Husbands, W., Murray, J., & Maxwell, J. (2008). Silence, assent, and HIV risk. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 10(8), 759–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Árnason, V. (2015). Toward critical bioethics. Camb Q Healthc Ethics, 24, 154–164.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourne, A., Dodds, C., Keogh, P., Weatherburn, P., & Hammond, G. (2009). Relative safety II: risk and unprotected anal intercourse among gay men with diagnosed HIV. Technical report. London: Sigma Research.Google Scholar
  6. Caron, D. (2014). The nearness of others: searching for tact and contact in the age of HIV. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cruikshank, B. (1993). Revolutions within: self-government and self-esteem. Econ Soc, 22(3), 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cruikshank, B. (1999). The will to empower: democratic citizens and other subjects. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dej, E., & Kilty, J. M. (2012). Criminalization creep: a brief discussion of the criminalization of HIV/AIDS non-disclosure in Canada. Canadian Journal of Law & Society, 27(1), 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dodds, C., & Keogh, P. (2006). Criminal convictions for HIV transmission: people living with HIV respond. Int J STD AIDS, 17(5), 315–318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dodds, C., Bourne, A., & Weait, M. (2009). Responses to criminal prosecutions for HIV transmission among gay men with HIV in England and Wales. Reproductive Health Matters, 17(34), 135–145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: an analysis of the concepts of purity and taboo. New York: Praeger Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fairclough, N.L. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality volume 1: an introduction. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. (1985). The history of sexuality volume 2: the use of pleasure. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (1986). The history of sexuality volume 3: the care of the self. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (1987). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom: an interview with Michel Foucault on January 20, 1984. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 12(2–3), 112–131.Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the Self (pp. 16–49). Massachusetts: Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  20. Galletly, C. L., DiFrancisco, W., & Pinkerton, S. D. (2009). HIV-positive persons’ awareness and understanding of their state’s criminal HIV disclosure law. AIDS Behavior, 13(6), 1262–1269.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Green, G. & Sobo, E.J. (2000). The endangered self: managing the social risks of HIV. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Heimer, C. A. (2013). ‘Wicked’ ethics: compliance work and the practice of ethics in HIV research. Soc Sci Med, 98, 371–378.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hochschild, A. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. Am J Sociol, 85(3), 551–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hunt, N. R. (1997). Condoms, confessors, conferences: among AIDS derivatives in Africa. J Int Inst, 4(3) Available at: (accessed 2 June 2016).
  25. Hunt, A. & Wickham G. (1994). Foucault and the law. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kilty, J.M. (2014). Dangerous liaisons, a tale of two cases: constructing women accused of HIV/AIDS non-disclosure as threats to the (inter)national body politic, within the confines: women and the law in Canada (pp. 271–292). Toronto: Women’s Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kinsman, G. (1996). ‘Responsibility’ as a strategy of governance: regulating people living with AIDS and lesbians and gay men in Ontario. Econ Soc, 25(3), 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klitzman, R., & Bayer, R. (2003). Tell it slant: sex, disclosure, and HIV. Stud Gend Sex, 4(3), 227–262.Google Scholar
  29. Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Lupton, D. (1994). Moral threats and dangerous desires: AIDS in the news media. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  31. Lupton, D. (1995). The imperative of health: public health and the regulated body. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Lupton, D. (2003). Medicine as culture: illness, disease and the body in western societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  33. Miller, J. (2005). African immigrant damnation syndrome: the case of Charles Ssenyonga. Sex Res Soc Policy, 2(2), 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mykhalovskiy, E. (2011). The problem of ‘significant risk’: exploring the public health impact of criminalizing HIV non-disclosure. Soc Sci Med, 75(5), 668–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mykhalovskiy, E., & Betteridge, G. (2012). Who? What? Where? When? And with what consequences? An analysis of criminal cases of HIV non-disclosure in Canada. Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 27(1), 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nguyen, V. K. (2004). Antiretroviral globalism, biopolitics and therapeutic citizenship. In A. Ong & S. J. Collier (Eds.), Global assemblages: technology, politics and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 124–144). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  37. Nguyen, V.K. (2010). The republic of therapy: triage and sovereignty in West Africa’s Time of AIDS. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Nguyen, V. K. (2013). Counselling against HIV in Africa: a genealogy of confessional technologies. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 15(S4), S440–S452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Byrne, P. (2012). Criminal law and public health practice: are the Canadian HIV disclosure laws an effective HIV prevention strategy? Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 9(1), 70–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rose, N., & Novas, C. (2006). Biological citizenship. In A. Ong & S. J. Collier (Eds.), Global assemblages: technology, politics and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 289–305). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Serovich, J. M., Oliver, D. G., Smith, S. A., & Mason, T. L. (2005). Methods of HIV disclosure by men who have sex with men to casual sexual partners. AIDS Patient Care STDs, 19(12), 823–832.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Simoni, J., & Pantalone, D. (2004). Secrets and safety in the age of AIDS. Topics in HIV Medicine, 12(4), 109–118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. van dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 249–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van dijk, T. A. (2001). Discourse, ideology and context. Folia Linguistica, 35(1), 11–40.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CriminologyUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.School of Political StudiesUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations