Sexuality Research and Social Policy

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 337–347 | Cite as

Strategic Authenticity and Voice: New Ways of Seeing and Being Seen as Young Mothers Through Digital Storytelling

  • Aline C. Gubrium
  • Elizabeth L. Krause
  • Kasey Jernigan
Article

Abstract

This paper presents the Ford Foundation-funded Hear Our Stories: Diasporic Youth for Sexual Rights and Justice project, which explores the subjective experience of structural violence and the ways young parenting Latinas embody and respond to these experiences. We prioritize uprooted young parenting Latinas, whose material conditions and cultural worlds have placed them in tenuous positions, both socially constructed and experientially embodied. Existing programs and policies focused on these women fail to use relevant local knowledge and rarely involve them in messaging efforts. This paper offers a practical road map for rendering relevant and modifying notions of voice as a form of knowledge with the potential to disrupt authoritative knowledge. We present the context and method behind the four digital storytelling workshops that served as a venue for transforming assumptions about young parenting women and producing novel understandings of teen pregnancy and parenting. We end by suggesting an intervention for what we call “strategic authenticity” as it plays out in storytelling, meaning making, and voice, and implications for policy concerned with social justice and equity.

Keywords

Digital storytelling Teen pregnancy and parenting Young mothers Youth sexuality Strategic authenticity Voice 

References

  1. Abu-Lughod, L. (1986). Veiled sentiments: honor and poetry in a Bedouin society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, M. (1980 [1940]) The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barcelos, C., & Gubrium, A. (Forthcoming 2014) Reproducing stories: Strategic narratives of teen pregnancy and motherhood. Social Problems, 61(3).Google Scholar
  4. Barthes, R. (1977). The death of the author. In S. Heath (Ed.), Image, music, text (pp. 142–148). New York, NY: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  5. Behar, R. (1997). The vulnerable observer: anthropology that breaks your heart. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
  6. Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (1986). Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Eide, E. (2010). Strategic essentialism and ethnification. Nordicom Review, 31, 63–78.Google Scholar
  8. Elbow, P. (1994). Introduction. In P. Elbow (Ed.), Landmark essays on voice and Writing (pp. xi–xlvii). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Elbow, P. (2007). Voice in writing again: embracing contraries. College English, 70, 168–188.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (1980). Two lectures. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972–77, Michel Foucault (pp. 78–108). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  11. Garcia, A. (2010). The pastoral clinic: addiction and dispossession along the Rio Grande. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Geertz, C. (1973). Deep play: notes on the Balinese cockfight. In The interpretation of cultures (pp. 412–454). New York, NY: BasicBooks.Google Scholar
  13. Ginsburg, F., & Rapp, R. (1995). Conceiving the new world order: the global politics of reproduction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gubrium, A. C. (2007). Making statistics lie: interrogating teenaged motherhood in a rural African-American community. Journal of the Association for Research on Mothering, 9, 125–137.Google Scholar
  15. Gubrium, A. C., & Turner, K. C. N. (2011). Digital storytelling as an emergent method for social research and practice. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), The handbook of emergent technologies in social research (pp. 469–491). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gubrium, A. C., Hill, A. L., & Flicker, S. (2013). A situated practice of ethics for participatory visual and digital methods in public health research and practice: a focus on digital storytelling. American Journal of Public Health. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamilton, B. E., Marin, J. A., & Ventura, S. J. (2012). Births: preliminary data for 2011. Vol 61 no 5. National Vital Statistics Reports.. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr61/nvsr61_05.pdf.Google Scholar
  18. Hancox, D. (2012). The process of remembering with the Forgotten Australians: digital storytelling and marginalized groups. Human Technology, 8, 65–76.Google Scholar
  19. Hill, J. H. (1995). The voices of Don Gabriel: responsibility and self in a modern Mexicano narrative. In D. Tedlock & B. Mannheim (Eds.), The dialogic emergence of culture (pp. 97–147). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hooks, B. (1994). When I was a young soldier for the revolution: coming to voice. In P. Elbow (Ed.), Landmark essays on voice and writing (pp. 51–58). Malwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Krause E. L. (2007) A manifesto for voice. Paper presented in Blurred Genres and the Search for Justice session, 106th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Washington, DC. December 1.Google Scholar
  22. Krause, E. L. (2009). Unraveled: a weaver’s tale of life gone modern. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Krause, E. L. (2012). “They just happened”: the curious case of the unplanned baby and the “end” of rationality. Medical Anthropological Quarterly, 26, 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krause, E. L., & De Zordo, S. (2012). Introduction. Ethnography and biopolitics: tracing ‘rationalities’ of reproduction across the north–south divide. Anthropology & Medicine, 19, 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Luker, K. (1999). A reminder that human behavior frequently refuses to conform to models created by researchers. Family Planning Perspectives, 31, 248–249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luna, Z., & Luker, K. (2013). Reproductive justice. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 9, 327–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (2013). Graduation rates. Retrieved from http://www.doe.mass.edu/infoservices/reports/gradrate.
  28. Massachusetts Department of Public Health (2011). State community health information profile: health status indicators report for [town]. Retrieved from http://www.mass.gov/eohhs/docs/dph/masschip/health-indicators/hsicity-town[X].rtf.
  29. Mulongo, E. M. N. (2006). Young single motherhood: contested notions of motherhood and sexuality in policy discourses/program Interventions. ISS Working Paper Series/General Series (Vol. 423, pp. 1–64) Erasmus University Rotterdam. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/19183.
  30. Murray, P. (2010). Skippy dies: a novel. New York: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  31. Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (1996). Narrating the self. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 9–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Palevsky, M. (2000). Atomic fragments: a daughter’s questions. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pereira, P. P. G. (2008). Anthropology and human rights: between silence and voice. Anthropology and Humanism, 33, 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roberts, D. (2014). The place of Black Feminism. Critical Feminist Thought and the Black Diaspora Symposium, University of Massachusetts Amherst, February 28.Google Scholar
  35. Rosaldo, R. (1989). Culture and truth: the remaking of social analysis. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
  36. Scheper-Hughes, N. (2004). Dangerous and endangered youth: social structures and determinants of violence. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1036, 13–46. doi:10.1196/annals.1330.002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Seremetakis, N. (1994). In C. N. Seremetakis (Ed.), The senses still, perception and memory as material culture in modernity. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  38. Sharf, B. F., Harter, L. M., Yamasaki, J., & Haidet, P. (2011). Narrative turns epic: continuous developments in health narrative scholarship. In T. Thompson, R. Parrott, & J. F. Nussbaum (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of health communication (pp. 36–51). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Smart, C. (1996). Deconstructing motherhood. In E. Silva (Ed.), Good enough mothering? Feminist perspectives on lone motherhood (pp. 37–57). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Spivak, G. C. (1985). Can the subaltern speak? Speculations on widow-sacrifice. Wedge, 7(8), 120–130.Google Scholar
  41. Stoller, P. (1994). Sensuous scholarship. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  42. U.S. Census Bureau. (2012) 2007–2011 American community survey. Retrieved from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/index.html#.
  43. Vannini, P., Waskul, D., & Gottschalk, S. (2012). The senses in self, society, and culture: a sociology of the senses. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Vidal-Ortiz, S. (2010). Religion/spirituality, U.S. Latina/o communities, and sexuality scholarship: a thread of current works. In M. Asencio (Ed.), Latina/o sexualities: probing powers, passions, practices, and policies (pp. 173–187). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Waskul, D. (2009). “My boyfriend loves it when I come home from this class”: pedagogy, titillation, and new media technologies. Sexualities, 12, 654–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  47. Yanow, D. (2013). Interpretive analysis and comparative research. In: I. Engeli and C. Rothmayr (Eds.), Comparative policy studies: conceptual and methodological challenges, Ch. 7. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, ECPR Research Methods Series.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aline C. Gubrium
    • 1
  • Elizabeth L. Krause
    • 2
  • Kasey Jernigan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Public HealthUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstAmherstUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations