Advertisement

Sexuality Research and Social Policy

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 211–224 | Cite as

“Who’s to Blame?” Constructing the Responsible Sexual Agent in Neoliberal Sex Education

  • Sinikka Elliott
Article

Abstract

Based on ethnographic observations in two high schools, this paper analyzes how sex educators deploy the neoliberal discourse of personal responsibility in their comprehensive and abstinence-only lessons. I focus not just on the explicit and intended messages of personal responsibility but also the hidden and evaded lessons that are imparted in the classroom. The findings demonstrate that sex educators rely on and reproduce gender, race, class, and sexual inequalities in their lessons in personal responsibility that put forth a version of the good sexual citizen as self-sufficient, self-regulating, and consequence-bearing, what I call the responsible sexual agent. Yet, in their hidden and evaded lessons, sex educators also underscore the extent to which people’s lives are intertwined with and reliant on others, suggesting the discourse of personal responsibility is inadequate for capturing the complexities and realities of people’s intimate lives. The findings point to the importance of examining the translation and negotiation of neoliberal sex education policy at the classroom level.

Keywords

Sex education Sexuality Gender Race Personal responsibility Neoliberalism 

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernstein, E., & Jakobsen, J. R. (2012/2013). Introduction: gender, justice, and neoliberal transformations. The Scholar & Feminist Online, 11.1–11.2, http://sfonline.barnard.edu/gender-justice-and-neoliberal-transformations/introduction/.
  3. Bettie, J. (2003). Women without class: Girls, race, and identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Boonstra, H. (2009). Advocates call for a new approach after the era of “abstinence-only” sex education. Guttmacher Policy Review 12, 1, http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/12/1/gpr120106.html.
  5. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. R. Nice (Trans.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Brenton, J., & Elliott, S. (2014). Undoing gender? The case of complementary and alternative medicine. Sociology of Health & Illness, 36(1), 1–34.Google Scholar
  8. Bridges, K. M. (2011). Reproducing race: An ethnography of pregnancy as a site of racialization. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brooks, S. (2012/2013). Beyond marriage and the military: race, gender, and radical sexual politics in the age of neoliberalism. The Scholar & Feminist Online 11.1–11.2, http://sfonline.barnard.edu/gender-justice-and-neoliberal-transformations/beyond-marriage-and-the-military-race-gender-and-radical-sexual-politics-in-the-age-of-neoliberalism/.
  10. Burns, A., & Torre, M. E. (2004). Shifting desires: discourses of accountability in abstinence-only education in the United States. In A. Harris (Ed.), All about the girl: Culture, power, and identity (pp. 127–137). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Cheng, S. (2012/2013). Embodying the sexual limits of neoliberalism. The Scholar & Feminist Online, 11.1–11.2, http://sfonline.barnard.edu/gender-justice-and-neoliberal-transformations/embodying-the-sexual-limits-of-neoliberalism/.
  13. Collier, A. (2007). The humble little condom: A history. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  14. Connell, C., & Elliott, S. (2009). Beyond the birds and the bees: Learning inequality through sexuality education. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 4, 83–102.Google Scholar
  15. Duggan, L. (2003). The twilight of equality? Neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on democracy. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  16. Elliott, S. (2010). Talking to teens about sex: Mothers negotiate resistance, discomfort, and ambivalence. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 7, 310–322.Google Scholar
  17. Elliott, S. (2012). Not my kid: What parents believe about the sex lives of their teenagers. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Elliott, S., & McKelvy, J. N. (2014). Talking sex: Parents, schools, and sexuality. In T. S. Weinberg & S. Newmahr (Eds.), Selves, symbols, and sexualities: An interactionist anthology (pp. 77–88). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Elliott, S., & Umberson, D. (2008). The performance of desire: Gender and sexual negotiation in long-term marriages. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 391–406.Google Scholar
  20. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. L., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Espiritu, Y. L. (2001). “We don’t sleep around like white girls do”: family, culture, and gender in Filipina American lives. Signs, 26, 415–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferguson, A. A. (2001). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of black masculinity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ferguson, R. A. (2012). The reorder of things: The university and its pedagogies of minority difference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fields, J. (2004). Same-sex marriage, sodomy laws, and the sexual lives of young people. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 1(3), 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fields, J. (2005). “Children having children”: race, innocence, and sexuality education. Social Problems, 52, 549–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fields, J. (2008). Risky lessons: Sex education and social inequality. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Fields, J. (2012). Sexuality education in the United States: shared cultural ideals across a political divide. Sociology Compass, 6(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fields, J., & Hirschman, C. (2007). Citizenship lessons in abstinence-only sexuality education. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 2(2), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fine, M., & McClelland, S. I. (2006). Sexuality education and desire: still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review, 76, 297–337.Google Scholar
  30. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. A. Sheridan (Trans.). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  31. Foucault, M. (1979). History of sexuality (Vol. 1.R. Hurley (Trans.)). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  32. Foucault, M. (1980). In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  33. Garcia, L. (2009). “Now why do you want to know about that?”: heteronormativity, sexism, and racism in the sexual (mis)education of Latina youth. Gender & Society, 23, 520–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Garcia, L. (2012). Respect yourself, protect yourself: Latina girls and sexual identity. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Gavey, N., McPhillips, K., & Doherty, M. (2001). “If it’s not on, it’s not on”—or is it? Discursive constraints on women’s condom use. Gender & Society, 15, 917–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gilbert, J. (2010). Ambivalence only? Sex education in the age of abstinence. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 10(3), 233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gonzalez-Lopez, G. (2004). Fathering Latina sexualities: Mexican men and the virginity of their daughters. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1118–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Grzanka, P. R., & Maher, J. (2012). Different like everyone else: stuff white people like and the marketplace of diversity. Symbolic Interaction, 35(3), 368–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hancock, A. M. (2004). The politics of disgust: The public identity of the welfare queen. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Hays, S. (2003). Flat broke with children: Women in the age of welfare reform. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Heath, M. (2012). One marriage under God: The campaign to promote marriage in America. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Heath, M. (2013). Sexual misgivings: producing un/marked knowledge in neoliberal marriage promotion policies. Sociological Quarterly, 54, 561–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Irvine, J. (2002). Talk about sex: The battles over sex education in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Jones, N. (2010). Between good and ghetto: African American girls and inner-city violence. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Kaplan, E. B. (1996). Not our kind of girl: Unraveling the myths of black teenage motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  46. Kendall, N. (2008). Sexuality education in an abstinence-only era: a comparative case study of two U.S. states. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 5, 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kirby, D. (2002). Do abstinence-only programs delay the initiation of sex among young people and reduce teen pregnancy? Washington, DC: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. http://www.teenpregnancy.org/resources/data/pdf/abstinence_eval.pdf.Google Scholar
  48. Lesko, N. (2010). Feeling abstinent? Feeling comprehensive? Touching the affects of sexuality curricula. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 10(3), 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Levine, J. (2013). Ain’t no trust: How bosses, boyfriends, and bureaucrats fail low-income mothers and why it matters. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  50. Lofland, J., Snow, D., Anderson, L., & Lofland, L. H. (2006). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (4th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  51. Luker, K. (1996). Dubious conceptions: The politics of teenage pregnancy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Luker, K. (2006). When sex goes to school: Warring views on sex—and sex education—since the sixties. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  53. Martin, K. (1996). Puberty, sexuality, and the self: Boys and girls at adolescence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Melamed, J. (2011). Represent and destroy: Rationalizing violence in the new racial capitalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  55. Miller, L. J. (2000). The poverty of truth-seeking: postmodernism, discourse analysis and critical feminism. Theory & Psychology, 10(3), 313–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mink, G. (1998). Welfare’s end. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Moore, K. (2012/2013). Fear and fun: science and gender, emotion and embodiment under neoliberalism. The Scholar & Feminist Online, 11.1–11.2, http://sfonline.barnard.edu/gender-justice-and-neoliberal-transformations/fear-and-fun-science-and-gender-emotion-and-embodiment-under-neoliberalism/.
  58. Moran, J. P. (2000). Teaching sex: The shaping of adolescence in the 20th century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Nathanson, C. A. (1991). Dangerous passage: The social control of sexuality in women’s adolescence. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  60. National Public Radio, Kaiser Family Foundation, and Harvard Kennedy School of Government Poll.(2004). Sex education in America. Publication no. 7015, January. Retrieved 25 Jul 2005, from http://www.kff.org/newsmedia/7015.cfm.
  61. Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  62. Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act. (1996). Pub. L. No. 104-193, sec. 912, 110 Stat. 2105-2355.Google Scholar
  63. Personal Responsibility Education Program (2010). The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Title II Role Of Public Programs, Subtitle L, Maternal and Child Health Services, Title V, Section 2953, Public Law 111-148, 42 U.S.C 713(c)(1). Retrieved on September 17, 2013 from https://www.cfda.gov/?s=program&mode=form&tab=step1&id=e9085baafbd785d09c9e4e52f9ec4ac4.
  64. Ringrose, J. (2007). Successful girls? Complicating post-feminist, neoliberal discourses of educational achievement and gender equality. Gender and Education, 19(4), 471–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rios, V. M. (2011). Punished: Policing the lives of black and Latino boys. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Solebello, N., & Elliott, S. (2011). “We want them to be as heterosexual as possible”: Fathers talk about their teen children’s sexuality. Gender & Society, 25(3), 293–315.Google Scholar
  67. Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Trenholm, C., Devaney, B., Fortson, K., Quay, L., Wheeler, J., & Clark, M. (2008). Impacts of four Title V, section 510 abstinence education programs: final report. Congressional Report by Mathematica Policy Research. http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/welfare/abstinence.asp.
  69. Valocchi, S. (2005). Not yet queer enough: the lessons of queer theory for the sociology of gender and sexuality. Gender & Society, 19(6), 750–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Whitehead, C. J. (2012). The nuptial deal: Same-sex marriage and neo-liberal governance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  71. Wilkins, A. (2008). Wannabes, goths, and Christians: The boundaries of sex, style, and status. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wilkins, A. (2012). Stigma and status: interracial intimacy and intersectional identities among black college men. Gender & Society, 26(2), 165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations