Sexuality Research and Social Policy

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 39–49

Impacts of Criminalization on the Everyday Lives of People Living with HIV in Canada

  • Barry D. Adam
  • Richard Elliott
  • Patrice Corriveau
  • Ken English
Article

Abstract

Over the last decade, there have been a rising number of prosecutions for nondisclosure of HIV status along with heightened media attention to the issue in Canada. One hundred twenty-two people living with HIV were interviewed concerning the effects of criminalization on their sense of personal security and their romantic and sexual relationships. The largest number of respondents believe that criminalization has unfairly shifted the burden of proof so that they: are held to be guilty until proven innocent; are now caught in a difficult he-said/(s)he-said situation of having to justify their actions, disgruntled partners now have a legal weapon to wield against them regardless of the facts and the onus now falls on women whose male partners could ignore their wishes regarding safer sex. In terms of general impact, many respondents report: a heightened sense of uncertainty, fear or vulnerability, but others feel that the climate of acceptance is still better than in the early days of the epidemic or that the prosecution of the high profile cases is justified. The increasing focus of the court system on penalizing non-disclosure is having counter-productive or unanticipated consequences that can run contrary to the ostensible objective of discouraging behaviour likely to transmit HIV.

Keywords

HIV transmission Criminal justice People living with HIV Canada 

References

  1. Adam, B. (2005). Constructing the neoliberal sexual actor. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 7(4), 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adam, B. (2006). Infectious behaviour. Social Theory and Health, 4, 168–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adam, B., Elliott, R., Husbands, W., Murray, J., & Maxwell, J. (2008). Effects of the criminalization of HIV transmission in Cuerrier on men reporting unprotected sex with men. Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 23(1–2), 137–153.Google Scholar
  4. Adam, B. D., Murray, J., Ross, S., Oliver, J., Lincoln, S., & Rynard, V. (2011). HIVstigma.com. Health Education Research, 26(5), 795–807.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnold, E. M., Rice, E., Flannery, D., & Rotheram-Borus, J. (2008). HIV disclosure among adults living with HIV. AIDS Care, 20(1), 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bairan, A., Taylor, G., Blake, B., Akers, T., Sowell, R., & Mendiola, R. (2007). A model of HIV disclosure. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 19, 242–250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brenner, B., Roger, M., Routy, J.-P., Moisi, D., Ntemgwa, M., Matte, C., et al. (2007). High rates of forward transmission events after acute/early HIV-1 infection. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 195, 951–959.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network. (2012). Criminal prosecutions for HIV non-disclosure: Two cases before the supreme court of Canada. Toronto: Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network.Google Scholar
  9. Chaudoir, S., Fisher, J., & Simoni, J. (2011). Understanding HIV disclosure. Social Science & Medicine, 72, 1618–1629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Wit, J., Ellard, J., Murphy, D., Zablotska, I., & Kippax, S. (2009). Sexual practices, serostatus disclosure and relationships. In S. Cameron & J. Rule (Eds.), The criminalisation of HIV transmission in Australia (pp. 100–107). Newtown: National Association of People Living with HIV/AIDS.Google Scholar
  11. Dodds, C., & Keogh, P. (2006). Criminal prosecutions for HIV transmission. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 17, 315–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dodds, C., Bourne, A., & Weait, M. (2009). Responses to criminal prosecutions for HIV transmission among gay men with HIV in England and Wales. Reproductive Health Matters, 17(34), 135–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Driskell, J., Salomon, E., Mayer, K., Capistrant, B., & Safren, S. (2008). Barriers and facilitators of HIV disclosure. Journal of HIV/AIDS & Social Services, 7(2), 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elliott, R. (1999). After Cuerrier: Canadian criminal law and the non-disclosure of HIV-positive status. Montreal: Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network.Google Scholar
  15. Elliott, R., & Symington, A. (2012a). Mabior and D.C.: does HIV non-disclosure equal rape? (part 1). TheCourt.ca, February 7, 2012, online: http://www.thecourt.ca/2012/02/07/mabior-and-d-c-is-criminal-law-the-answer-to-non-disclosure-part-2/.
  16. Elliott, R., & Symington, A. (2012b). Is criminal law the answer to HIV non-disclosure? (part 2). TheCourt.ca, February 7, 2012, online: http://www.thecourt.ca/2012/02/07/mabior-and-d-c-does-hiv-non-disclosure-equal-rape-part-1/.
  17. Galletly, C., & Dickson-Gomez, J. (2009). HIV seropositive status disclosure to prospective sex partners and criminal laws that require it. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 20, 613–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galletly, C., & Pinkerton, S. (2006). Conflicting messages. AIDS and Behavior, 10, 451–461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Global Commission on HIV and the Law. (2012). Risks, rights & health. New York: UNDP, HIV/AIDS Group, Bureau for Development Policy.Google Scholar
  20. Hart, T., Wolitski, R., Purcell, D., Parsons, J., Gómez, C., & Seropositive Urban Men’s Study Team. (2005). Partner awareness of the serostatus of HIV-seropositive men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 9(2), 155–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heaphy, B. (2001). The (im)possibilities of living as people with AIDS. In S. Cunningham-Burley & K. Backett-Milburn (Eds.), Exploring the body (pp. 117–136). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Henriksson, B., & Månsson, S. (1995). Sexual negotiations. In H. ten Brummelhuis & G. Herdt (Eds.), Culture and sexual risk. Luxembourg: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
  23. Holt, M., Rawstorne, P., Worth, H., Bittman, M., Wilkinson, J., & Kippax, S. (2011). Predictors of HIV disclosure among untested, HIV-negative and HIV-positive Australian men who had anal intercourse with their most recent casual male sex partner. AIDS and Behavior, 15, 1128–1139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Larcher, A., & Symington, A. (2010). Criminal and victims? Toronto: African and Caribbean Council on HIV/AIDS in Ontario.Google Scholar
  25. Mao, L., Crawford, J., Hospers, H., Prestage, G., Grulich, A., Kaldor, J., et al. (2006). ‘Serosorting’ in casual anal sex of HIV-negative gay men is noteworthy and is increasing in Sydney, Australia. AIDS, 20(8), 1204–1206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Menadue, D. (2009). The impact of the criminalisation issue on HIV-positive people. In S. Cameron & J. Rule (Eds.), The criminalisation of HIV transmission in Australia (pp. 146–153). Newtown: National Association of People Living with HIV/AIDS.Google Scholar
  27. Mykhalovskiy, E., & Betteridge, G. (2012). Who? What? Where? When? And with what consequences? An analysis of criminal cases of HIV non-disclosure in Canada. Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 27(1), 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mykhalovskiy, E., Betteridge, G., Mclay, D. (2010). HIV non-disclosure and the criminal law. Toronto: A report funded by a grant from the Ontario HIV Treatment Network.Google Scholar
  29. Persson, A., & Newman, C. (2008). Making monsters. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30(4), 632–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Public Health Agency of Canada. (2010). Undiagnosed HIV infections in Canada. HIV/AIDS Epi updates—July 2010. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada.Google Scholar
  31. Race, K. (2012). Framing responsibility. Bioethical Inquiry, 9, 327–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Serovich, J., Oliver, D., Smith, S., & Mason, T. (2005). Methods of HIV disclosure by men who have sex with men to casual sexual partners. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 19(12), 823–832.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siegel, K., Lekas, H., & Schrimshaw, E. (2005). Serostatus disclosure to sexual partners by HIV-infected women before and after the advent of HAART. Women & Health, 41(4), 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Simoni, J., & Pantalone, D. (2004). Secrets and safety in the age of AIDS. Topics in HIV Medicine, 12(4), 109–118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. St de Lore, J., Thiede, H., Cheadle, A., Goldbaum, G., Carey, J., Hutcheson, R., et al. (2012). HIV disclosure and subsequent sexual behaviors among men who have sex with men who meet online. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(4), 592–609.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stirratt, M. (2005). I have something to tell you. In P. Halkitis, C. Gómez, & R. Wolitski (Eds.), HIV+ sex (pp. 101–119). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  37. Symington, A. (2009). Criminalization confusion and concerns: the decade since the Cuerrier decision. HIV/AIDS Policy & Law Review, 14(1), 5–10.Google Scholar
  38. Weait, M. (2007). Intimacy and responsibility. New York: Routledge-Cavendish.Google Scholar
  39. Welch Cline, R., & McKenzie, N. (2000). Dilemmas of disclosure in the age of HIV/AIDS. In S. Petronio (Ed.), Balancing the secrets of private disclosures (pp. 71–96). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barry D. Adam
    • 1
    • 2
  • Richard Elliott
    • 3
  • Patrice Corriveau
    • 4
  • Ken English
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Anthropology and CriminologyUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada
  2. 2.Ontario HIV Treatment NetworkTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal NetworkTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Department of CriminologyUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  5. 5.Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term CareTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations