Advertisement

Sexuality Research and Social Policy

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 97–109 | Cite as

Explaining Variation in Relations Among Intrinsic Religiosity, Political Conservatism, and Homonegativity as a Function of Authoritarianism’s Three Components: an Expansion on Recent Literature

  • Catherine Pearte
  • Kimberly Renk
  • Charles Negy
Article

Abstract

Past research suggested that the strong relationship between having high levels of religiosity and/or political conservatism and harboring a high level of negativity toward homosexuals often is accounted for by the strength of individuals’ authoritarian views. In an effort to build upon this extant research, the goal of this study was to examine the way in which components of authoritarianism mediate the relationship between religiosity and political conservatism and homonegativity. To achieve this goal, a recently developed modality of path analysis that allows for the effect of one independent variable on another to be controlled was used. Because preliminary analyses indicated that attitudes toward same-sex marriage and homonegativity demonstrated multicollinearity, a composite measure was created. Results suggested that the overall strength of the relationship between religiosity and political conservatism with homonegativity remains statistically significant, even after accounting for three components of authoritarianism and the potential effect of social desirability. These authoritarianism components also had a significant indirect effect on the strength of the relationship between religiosity and homonegativity, with authoritarian submission and conventionalism fully mediating this relationship. Implications of these findings were discussed.

Keywords

Homonegativity Homophobia Heterosexism Religion Religious behavior Religiosity Political beliefs Political conservatism Attitudes toward same-sex marriage 

References

  1. Adams, H. E., Wright, L. W., & Lohr, B. A. (1996). Is homophobia associated with homosexual arousal? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 440–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altemeyer, R. A. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: Manitoba University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, A. B., & Scheufele, D. A. (2011). New voters, new outlook? Predispositions, social networks, and the changing politics of gay civil rights. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 324–345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beran, N. J., Claybaker, C., Dillon, C., & Haverkamp, R. J. (1992). Attitudes toward minorities: a comparison of homosexuals and the general population. Journal of Homosexuality, 23, 65–83. doi: 10.1300/J082v23n03_05.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brumbaugh, S. M., Sanchez, L. A., Nock, S. L., & Wright, J. D. (2008). Attitudes toward gay marriage in states undergoing marriage law transformation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burnett, R., & Salka, W. (2009). Determinants of electoral support for anti-gay marriage constitutional amendments: an examination of 2006 votes on ballot measures in the states. Journal of Homosexuality, 56, 1071–1082. doi: 10.1080/00918360903275476.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conley, T. D., Evett, S. R., & Devine, P. G. (2007). Attitudes, subjective experiences, and behaviors in imagined and actual encounters between gay and heterosexual people. Journal of Homosexuality, 53, 35–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cozby, P. C. (2003). Methods in behavioral research (7th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Dedert, B. S., Studts, J. L., Weissbecker, I., Salmon, P. G., Banis, P. L., & Sephton, S. E. (2004). Religiosity may help preserve the cortisol rhythm in women with stress-related illness. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 34, 61–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duckitt, J. (2005). Personality and prejudice. In J. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 395–412). Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Duckitt, J., & Bizumic, B. (2013). Multidimensionality of right-wing authoritarian attitudes: Authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism. Political Psychology. doi: 10.1111/pops.12022.
  14. Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation, and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: a dual process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1861–1894.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, S. W., & Heled, E. (2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: the authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31, 685–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edwards, J. (2007). ‘Marriage is sacred’: the religious right's arguments against ‘gay marriage’ in Australia. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 93, 247–261. doi: 10.1080/13691050601120548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Funke, F. (2005). The dimensionality of right-wing authoritarianism: lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26, 195–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gallup. (2006). Americans still oppose gay marriage. http://www.gallup.com/poll/22882/Americans-Still-Oppose-Gay-Marriage.aspx. Accessed 10 Apr 2012.
  21. Gallup. (2008). CA ruling on same-sex marriage bucks majority view. http://www.gallup.com/poll/107305/Ruling-SameSex-Marriage-Bucks-Majority-View.aspx. Accessed 10 Apr 2012.
  22. Gallup. (2011). For the first time, majority of Americans favor gay marriage. http://www.gallup.com/poll/147662/First-Time-Majority-Americans-Favor-Legal-Gay-Marriage.aspx. Accessed 10 Apr 2012.
  23. Gangestad, S. W., Bailey, J. M., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Taxometric analyses of sexual orientation and gender identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1109–1121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbachs alpha reliability coefficients for Likert-type scales. Unpublished paper presented at the Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/bitstream/handle/1805/344/Gliem%2520&%2520Gliem.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2012.
  25. Goodman, M. B., & Moradi, B. (2008). Attitudes and behaviors toward lesbian and gay persons: critical correlates and mediated relations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 371–384. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.55.3.371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hall, D. L., Matz, D. C., & Wood, W. (2010). Why don’t we practice what we preach? A meta-analytic review of religious racism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 126–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenney: statistical mediation analyses in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2013). Indirect and direct effects of a multicategorical causal agent in statistical mediation analysis. (in press).Google Scholar
  29. Herek, G. M. (1988). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Herek, G. M. (1994). Assessing heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: a review of empirical research with the ATLG. In B. Greene & G. M. Herek (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 206–228). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Herrick, R. (2010). Legislators' positions on gay and lesbian rights: the personal and political. Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 928–943. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2010.493449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluation model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Hutcheson, G., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: introductory statistics using generalized linear models. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  34. James, L. R., Mulaik, S. S., & Brett, J. M. (1982). Causal analysis: assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Johnson, M. E., Brems, C., & Alford-Keating, P. (1997). Personality correlates of homophobia. Journal of Homosexuality, 34, 57–69. doi: 10.1300/J082v34n01_05.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson, M. K., Rowatt, W. C., Barnard-Brak, L. M., Patock-Peckham, J. A., LaBouff, J. P., & Carlisle, R. D. (2011). A mediational analysis of the role of right-wing authoritarianism and religious fundamentalism in the religiosity-prejudice link. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 851–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnson, M. K., LaBouff, J. P., Rowatt, W. C., Patock-Peckham, J. A., & Carlisle, R. D. (2012). Facets of right-wing authoritarianism mediate the relationship between religious fundamentalism and attitudes toward Arabs and African Americans. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51, 128–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01622.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. D., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  39. Klemmack, D. L., Roff, L. L., Parker, M. W., Koenig, H. G., Sawyer, P., & Allman, R. M. (2007). A cluster analysis typology of religiousness/spirituality among older adults. Research on Aging, 29, 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Koenig, H. G., Meador, K., & Parkerson, G. (1997). Religion index for psychiatric research: a five-item measure for use in health outcome studies. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 54, 885–886.Google Scholar
  41. Kossowska, M., Bukowski, M., & Van Hiel, A. (2008). The impact of submissive versus dominant authoritarianism and negative emotions on prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 744–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Laythe, B., Finkel, D. G., Bringle, R. G., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2002). Religious fundamentalism as a predictor of prejudice: a two-component model. Journal for the Scientific Study of Spirituality, 41, 623–635.Google Scholar
  43. Mavor, K. I., Macleod, C. J., Boal, M. J., & Louis, W. R. (2009). Right-wing authoritarianism, fundamentalism and prejudice revisited: removing suppression and statistical artifact. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 592–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mavor, K. I., Louis, W. R., & Laythe, B. (2011). Religion, prejudice, and authoritarianism: is RWA a boon or bane to the psychology of religion? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50, 22–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McHoskey, J. W. (1996). Authoritarianism and ethical ideology. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 709–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mehrabian, A. (1996). Relations among political attitudes, personality, and psychopathology assessed with new measures of libertarianism and conservatism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 469–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mooney, C. Z., & Schuldt, R. G. (2008). Does moral policy exist? Testing a basic assumption. The Policy Studies Journal, 36, 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Negy, C., & Eisenman, R. (2005). A comparison of African American and White college students’ affective and attitudinal reactions to lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals: an exploratory study. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 291–298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Negy, C., & Winton, S. (2008). A comparison of pro- and anti-nudity college students on acceptance of self and of culturally dissimilar others. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 287–294.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Olson, L. R., Cadge, W., & Harrison, J. T. (2006). Religion and public opinion about same-sex marriage. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 340–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. A. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (Vol. 1, pp. 17–60). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  52. Pearl, M. L., & Paz-Galupo, M. P. (2007). Development and validation of the attitudes toward same-sex marriage scale. Journal of Homosexuality, 5, 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short-forms of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rowatt, W. C., Tsang, J., Kelly, J., LaMartina, B., Mccullers, M., & McKinley, A. (2006). Associations between religious personality dimensions and implicit homosexual prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45, 397–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2006.00314.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rowatt, W. C., LaBouff, J., Johnson, M., Froese, P., & Tsang, J. A. (2009). Associations among religiousness, social attitudes, and prejudice in a national random sample of American adults. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1, 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Saucier, D. A., & Cawman, A. J. (2004). Civil unions in Vermont: political attitudes, religious fundamentalism, and sexual prejudice. Journal of Homosexuality, 48, 1–18. doi: 10.1300/J082v48n01_01.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schulte, L. J., & Battle, J. (2004). The relative importance of ethnicity and religion in predicting attitudes towards gays and lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 47, 127–141. doi: 10.1300/J082v47n02_08.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schwartz, J. (2010). Investigating differences in public support for gay rights issues. Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 748–759. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2010.485875.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sell, R. L. (1993). Defining and measuring sexual orientation: a review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 643–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sherkat, D., de Vries, K., & Creek, S. (2010). Race, religion, and opposition to same-sex marriage. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 80–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00682.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sherkat, D. E., Powell-Williams, M., Maddox, G., & Mattias de Vries, K. (2011). Religion, politics, and support for same-sex marriage in the United States, 1988-2008. Social Science Research, 40, 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: a meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Steffen, P. R., & Fearing, M. (2007). Does defensiveness account for the relationship between religiosity and psychosocial adjustment? The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17, 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.Google Scholar
  65. Storch, E. A., Roberti, J. W., Heidgerken, A. D., Storch, J. B., Lewin, A. B., Killiany, E. M., et al. (2004). The Duke religion index: a psychometric investigation. Pastoral Psychology, 53, 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Swank, E., & Raiz, L. (2010). Predicting the support of same-sex relationship rights among social work students. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services: The Quarterly Journal of Community & Clinical Practice, 22, 149–164. doi: 10.1080/10538720903332552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  68. Taylor, V., Kimport, K., Van Dyke, N., & Anderson, E. A. (2009). Culture and mobilization: tactical repertoires, same-sex weddings, and the impact on gay activism. American Sociological Review, 74, 865–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Waldner, L. K., Sikka, A., & Baig, S. (1999). Ethnicity and sex differences in university student’s knowledge of AIDS, fear of AIDS, and attitudes toward gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 37, 117–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Walls, N. (2010). Religion and support for same-sex marriage: implications from the literature. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services: The Quarterly Journal of Community & Clinical Practice, 22, 112–131. doi: 10.1080/10538720903332420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Whitley, B., & Egisdottir, S. (2000). The gender belief system, authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Sex Roles, 42, 947–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Whitley, B. E., & Lee, S. E. (2000). The relationship of authoritarianism and related constructs to attitudes toward homosexuality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 144–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations